BLR rifle opinions??

Short action cartridges are the juice with this lever hunting rifle. You don't want one in 7 Rem Mag and shooting at an upward angle at live game. You will poke your eye out one day. From the end of the bolt. Probably not the scope eyepiece.
 
Last edited:
I got a fever, and the only cure is more BLR!
UrVbDpM.jpg

6s1pA90.jpg

VSbtg9N.jpg
 
The BLR is a very handy lever action rifle! Being a lefty, I really like lever actions!
I have a pre-81 in 358 Win that I have had for over 20 years that is my main guiding/backup/horseback/ATV rifle. The previous owner stripped the factory finish and oiled the stock, which I do like. The metal was in poor shape, but after having it tefloned, was like a new rifle again. And I was lucky enough to find a spare magazine for it back then. I too prefer the straight grip to the pistol grip stock.
I shot my first whitetail buck as a young hunter with my friend's Dad's BLR in 308. I have also owned a Belgian in 243 Win (that I shouldn't have sold), and another newer steel receiver 358 Win that would shoot 1/3" groups with handloads that I sold back to my hunting partner when his grandson expressed a desire for one. I am still looking for a 257 Roberts. Have also been contemplating acquiring a laminated T/D version - perhaps in 6.5 CM.

While they are not known for accuracy, they can be acceptably accurate (and better) with their preferred loads, and yes that short, light barrel can heat up quickly, affecting accuracy. When target shooting, give it time to cool between shots and it will not be an issue. When hunting, a couple of quick follow up shots may be necessary, but to be honest, I have never emptied the magazine in a hunting scenario (even guiding) to date so hasn't been an issue.
The triggers are not great to terrible (and not easily fixed), but as with anything, the more you use it, the more you will get to knw it. Mine has terrible creep and over travel, but after getting to know it, I know exactly where it breaks and can keep my shots consistently within a 1" group at 100 yards with its preferred load (Speer 220 gr Hot Cor FP).
I know there was one writer who used a T/D in 300 WSM to take a mountain goat at 600 yards; so can be said to be accurate enough!

As mentioned above, the metal receiver models are preferred to the alloy receivers by many.

I also own 3 Winchester Model 88's and really like them, as they also lock up like a bolt action (and are easier to customize with new barrels/chamberings), but are not as light and handy as the BLR. (And they too have terrible triggers that are not easily fixed). My semi custom in 250 Savage will produce .209" groups with the HSM 100 gr SGK ammo! (It does have the best trigger I have ever found on a Model 88, and the action has been stoned to make it very smooth, and then Cerkoted, which not only protects the metal but adds a bit of its own lubricity)

Best of luck with your new 243! Hope you have many great adventures with it!
 
We hear alot about the first Belgian BLRs versus the later ones built elsewhere. Can you informed folks elaborate more fully upon your preference of Belgian made rifles?

respectfully....

I'm not claiming to be informed but from what I gather some prefer the Belgian BLRs due to the fact that it has a steel receiver instead of the aluminum lightweight receivers which were introduced later. From what I gather BLRs were produced 1971-1972 in Belgium and after that from 1973 ongoing to this date in Japan, Miroku, which built steel receiver and aluminum receiver models.

So, a Belgium BLR is definitely rarer than a Miroku made BLR.
 
Winchester model 70 Featherweight is but one example. There are several others. I've seen new Blr's on the shelf with a price close to $1700 and those were just blued models.

Those are definitley nice hunting rifles!

But, if you want to scratch a lever itch they ain't gonna do it.
 
Back
Top Bottom