Bowie Knives

I like th eRussel knives too.

I have been looking at this knife though.

pk_2818.JPG
 
I'm with Super Cub too ... bought my first "Russell" No. 1 in 1968.

Have since had the opportunity to "tour" the Grohmann facility in
Pictou, NS, and learned a few maintenance & sharpening hints while
there.

For general use, field dressing game, etc. I prefer the smaller (but very similar to the No. 1) Trout & Bird model (being a "reamer", not a "splitter".
The short skinner is for me, the more useful of the two for that purpose.

I've also got a somewhat narrow-bladed lock-back folder I bought a long time ago that looks like a Remington "Mini Trapper's" knife.

Design, function, good steel & quality is everything in a knife, and you don't have to spend a fortune on a "big name".
 
When I got married back in '82 I gave Russel beltknives to all my ushers as gifts. That said though I still like a large knife for field dressing. Put the blade through the hole in the pelvis sharp side up and pry back to split the pelvise righ there and now. Does a better job of ripping up through the breastplate too. I have a buddy who owns the Puma and I envy him. Nice nife with weight in the blade for chopping like the little feet off a bunny or a duck. I use a Buck 119 but also have the same in a folder lots of times. If your worried about a knife being too long for use in butchering just take a look at what the guys use that cut meat and butcher everyday for a living. The perferred kife of choice whether a Henkle or some other comes with a 6" blade. I have 2 Henkles in 6" for boning and a 12' Victorinox for steaking. I've never got myself with the boners but I did get a nice one two years ago with the big knife trying to split a 22lb Eastern in half./tt
 
Last edited:
The Puma Bowie knife pictured in the first post is currently on sale for $90or $99 at SIR. Check out the web site and look for Puma
 
That's a heck of a good price. They were almost that much 30 years ago. Puma is very fine quality steel not as hard as Buck but also not as brittle. I've sharpened a couple of Pumas and found they come up very sharp but it takes a long time;) as does a Buck. I found the Buck to nick easily if was dropped on gravel etc. I dropped mine on some gravel while gutting salmon more than 30 years ago and I'm just now getting those nicks sharpened out
Think the Puma is too big;) This is my Bowie! The blade is 15" and I made 'er out of o1 tool steel. THe handle is from a 12 point shed. I took the dimensions from a pic on a Jim Bowie History website. This is a fine camping tool since it is pretty much a machette and too much too carry as a hunting knife.The original knives were fighting knives. I beheaded a hanging deer with this knife with on swipe so it still is handi I reckon;)
357ge1i.jpg
 
Personal preference.
I like a smaller blade for field dressing deer and moose, however my brother uses a buck 119 as his main hunting knife and I have used it a few time with no trouble at all.
In fact I am buying a 119 because I like the knife.
I have used everything from a stockman folder to Gerber LMF (and wester cutlery bowie) to field dress game and while I have had preferences none of them have been big enough for me to mock someone else's choice
 
Bad luck for me.

I ordered my Boker, not here yet.

But I picked up a parcel yesterday amnd told my wife I hoped it was my knife, she said you can't have it till Christmas????? After a long wierd conversation, I realized that I ordered the Boker and my lovely wife ordered me the Puma from SIR.

What will I do with 2 new knives?? What a predicament???
 
Long story short, Boker makes Muella, Muella is their low end, same steel though.

I was going between two knives and my buddy's wife asked for help in picking him a new knife. I showed her the ones I was looking at and she licked the Muella.

She showed it to me today, I am very impressed with the workmanship and quality.
 
Back
Top Bottom