Browning Buck Mark - Review and Range Report

mmatt

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
68   0   0
So I ordered a Ruger MkIII 22/45. Long story short, I got a Browning Buck Mark instead. Not really sure if I am happy it worked out this way or not as I'm pretty sure that I would have been just as happy with the Ruger, but I digress. (not looking good guys, I got off track less than three sentences in!) :redface:

So yeah, the Buck Mark. You'll notice that I am using the correct spelling of the pistol; it is a Buck Mark, not a Buckmark. It came all nicely wrapped up from the retailer and under all the wrapping was this:
8133_158909850198_509315198_4020149_7189003_n.jpg


Inside that was this:
8133_158909855198_509315198_4020150_5349855_n.jpg


and this:
8133_158909845198_509315198_4020148_5733756_n.jpg


This is a new one for me... I don't know if you can read the card due to the small picture size, but it's summed up by saying that some jurisdictions require spent casings to be sent to the PD in a sealed envelope. Doesn't really say why but I'm guessing that it would be used to rule out your gun if it was suspected to have been used in a crime. (Doesn't sound so sinister if I put it that way, huh? :rolleyes: )

It comes with only one mag, but I sprang for a second one as one is never enough. The gun itself is rather hefty for a .22 I found. It has nice sized grips though and when you hold it in a shooting stance, it feels almost like you're holding a "real" gun thanks in part to a ".45" styled grip angle.

8133_158909860198_509315198_4020151_7238927_n.jpg


I find the thumb rest to be a bit "in the way" for my hands, but it could simply be that I'm just not used to it.

8133_158909870198_509315198_4020152_6074643_n.jpg


One major flaw with this design is that it cannot be field stripped without tools. Fortunately, if you have one of those fancy tooth scrubbing thingies, a good cleaning job can still be had without taking it apart.

But yeah, I know, you're gonna take it apart anyway, right? OK, first, use the supplied allen key to remove the two top screws holding on the slide "bridge" (for lack of a better term):
8133_158909885198_509315198_4020153_6418537_n.jpg


The "bridge" is made out of plastic. :( I would have liked this to have been metal, but whatever. I don't exactly know how I got the gun apart, but I did. The interweb told me (there were no instructions in the manual other than "take it to a qualified gunsmith"... yeah right! :p ) that I was supposed to first remove the firing pin assembly and then lift the slide off; but there was no way that I could figure to do it without using some sort of tool that would scratch everything up. So I somehow managed to pull the slide back, grasp the rod from the front, pull the whole slide assembly up and forward a bit which let the white plastic buffer fall out and then the whole slide assembly lifted off. At that point the firing pin assembly came out rather easily.

Slide assembly:
8133_158909900198_509315198_4020156_6245108_n.jpg


Slide with firing pin assembly out and recoil buffer:
8133_158909905198_509315198_4020157_5793668_n.jpg


Internal mechanisms:
8133_158909890198_509315198_4020154_5588506_n.jpg


Putting it back together wasn't nearly as difficult as taking it apart, but since I've discovered that one can clean it without taking it apart, I bet it's gonna stay together for a very long time. As for cleaning, the instructions say to clean from the muzzle, taking great care to avoid damaging the crown. In the event that I need to use a bronze brush on this, I will take that to heart. Until then, a bore snake through the chamber a few times will keep it clean enough for me.

I heard from an unconfirmed source that dry-firing is not recommended with this gun, but I had my doubts. So I took a thin slice of paper, inserted it between the firing pin and the chamber and pulled the trigger. Nothing happened, so I inserted a mag and tried again. Yes, it had a magazine disconnector safety thingy. Boo. But the paper was completely unharmed. So unless it is possible to damage the firing pin without it hitting the chamber face, you should fine if you want to practice at home.

I didn't feel like practicing at home, I wanted to shoot it! :D

So off to the range I go. I bring three of the most commonly found rounds in this area: Dynapoints, Xperts, and the 333 Bulk Pack stuff. I also brought a few Stingers Just for fun. :)

The Xperts shot the worst and were the only rounds to give me problems. At least 5 FTE and multiple stove pipes with this ammo. Accuracy was so-so, but not great.

The 333 Bulk Pack stuff came in second. No malfunctions other than a few duds, but that's to be expected with bulk ammo. Accuracy was way better.

But it was the Dynapoints that kicked both their butts. No malfunctions and great accuracy to boot! Here is a target shot thirty times at 25 yards:
8133_158909915198_509315198_4020158_1915380_n.jpg


I shot about 500 rounds this afternoon, so I bet you're guessing that my thumbs hurt from loading the mags. You'd be guessing wrong. If you have a Ruger MkI, MkII, MkIII or a Buck Mark of your own, you owe it to yourself to get one of these:
8133_158909920198_509315198_4020159_1677577_n.jpg


It is called the "Ultimate Clip Loader" and is available from a a few different sources. I got mine from steve4ultimatesales.com for $22.75 USD shipping included, so it's not like it's expensive.

It works like this -

First, drop in some ammo in the storage compartment; it'll hold about 50 rounds:
8133_158909925198_509315198_4020160_326423_n.jpg


Slide the lid shut and shake it a little bit. The rounds will drop nose first into a slot along the bottom:
8133_158909930198_509315198_4020161_2585590_n.jpg


Tilt the "Clip Loader" about 45 degrees so the rounds stack up on each other:
8133_158909935198_509315198_4020162_1350309_n.jpg


Insert magazine (don't know where the "clip" part comes into play... ;) ):
8133_158909945198_509315198_4020163_2873041_n.jpg


all the way up (you may need to shake it a little if the rounds hang up):
8133_158909950198_509315198_4020164_7078509_n.jpg


And viola! A full magazine:
8133_158909960198_509315198_4020165_218064_n.jpg


Quite simply the greatest invention of all time! :D

So overall, love the gun, glad I got it; kinda curious what the Ruger would have been like but whatever, maybe next time.

Matthew
 
The Browning/Ruger debate has been going on for a long time and you will find almost even numbers on both sides.

Nice report on your gun and yes it is kind of ironic that you originally were going to get the Ruger.

I have a Buck Mark and have put quite a bit of rounds through it, it's absolutely accurate and I get only the occasional jam, probably one in 50-100 shots with really cheap ammo.

I really like my URX and I probably use it the most of all my guns.
051407m.jpg
 
When I discovered that it was a Buck Mark I was getting instead of a Ruger, I narrowed my choices down to the URX and the Camper. :) Ultimately it came down to the grips, I prefer the ones without the finger grooves. But other than that... nice gun! :D

Matthew
 
Congrats, you'll love it!

I got my Contour URX last week and have been very, very pleased!

I think the plastic rear sight/rail is a Camper thing. They are metal on mine.

I love the weight and feeling of it; definitely not a "toy gun".

I have been using AE 38gr HP and CCI MiniMags with good results. A couple of stovepipes in ~150 rnds but I guess it's normal for a brand new gun. Will try the Dynapoints this week end for sure.

IMG_2258a.jpg


Ah, and make sure you check out http://ww w.rimfirecentral.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=17
 
I have a URX 7.25 and I can't wait to get my ATT to finally get out shooting it, been 5 weeks now! Love how they shoot though, got to try the 5 inch URX on my safety course and liked it a lot better than the ruger.

Gonna have to get me that mag loader and a few more mags now...
 
My Buck Mark is the Camper model. I bought an extra magazine because I hate the fact that it comes with only one.

I bought this over the Ruger MkIII because I thought the Buck Mark fit my hands better, had the heavier barrel, felt more balanced, and just plain looked better than the Ruger.

Aside from the fact that I am not supposed to disassemble it for cleaning (and I CAN clean it with a cleaning rod and an old toothbrush), I think it's a better firearm for target shooting/plinking/practice (I use mine for cheap practice) than just about everything else out there. BTW the price was right too.

You can't go wrong with a Browning Buck Mark .22 pistol.
 
Nice review. Thanks

I bought a Buck Mark exactly like this one about 3 months ago. The only problem I had was stovepipes until about 400 rounds . Now it is working just fine. It needed to be broken in .

Like most .22's it is fussy as to which brand it likes for best accuracy but that is typical.

I like mine also but having had Ruger's before , they are both very good guns. Either one is a good choice IMO.
 
I have a Ruger 22/45 and a buck mark, i much prefer the way the browning feels in my hand. i have the practical model with the finger grips and the fiber optic front sight. I will prob end up getting a black front sight as the fiber optic is quick but not so precise.
 
I have a buckmark URX....love it.
Others at the range who have tried it state nothing but positive about it.
With two witnesses, I hit the 300M gongs with it four times out of a 10 rd mag.
 
With two witnesses, I hit the 300M gongs with it four times out of a 10 rd mag.

That's awesome! My cousin not ever shooting anything before hit the gong at 75m 7 out of 10 times after a 1/2 hour of practice with my buckmark Camper. (OT I wish i could actually camp with my camper lol) I gotta try the 300... well maybe the 100 first. :p
 
I also got a Browning Buck Mark, the Camper model in stainless and I absolutly love it!
It's been great, I mostly shoot federal cheap stuff and tried a bunch of other ammo and so far it's pretty reliable! I've shot close to 3000 rounds before cleaning it and it only started to get unreliable at the end

I bought it used with 2 mags but it was almost new! So far for the price i think everyone should have one! Great for praticing and especially great to introduce people to the sport!
Girls love it haha!
 
For general shooting I prefer a lighter .22 so it has more "life" in my hands. But a month or so back at the end of a Speed Steel match I got to try one of the shooter's Buck Mark. Yes the extra weight damped the recoil but MAN! COULD THAT THING PUT ROUNDS ON TARGET IN A HURRY! ! ! ! ! And for a competitive use that's often what counts. I'd shot my own 422 against him but couldn't match his times just due to the extra kick of the lighter gun.

Yes, I'm looking at the Rugers and Buck Marks now.... :D
 
My first gun was a Browning Buck Mark Bullseye Target URX, amazingly accurate and enjoyable gun. It sorta sat in the safe for a while when I got a bit carried away with center-fire handguns, but recently it's been coming with me on every range trip.

051411l.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom