Arguable. The magwell angle and use of stanard AR-15 trigger pins and safeties are both definite plusses. If the improvements to the gas system prevent pistons snapping, this should bring that portion up to the par with the MCR. The non-reciprocating charging handle should solve the charging handle breaking, but this also means it can't be used as a forward assist, and we don't know if Kodiak's implementation will proven dependable, or have some other problem yet. Unless someone really loves the non-reciprocaing charigng handle and straight magwell angle, the MCR is probably still the safer bet, at least until we see how dependable the WK180-C Gen 2 is in the long run. The changes overall are positive, and hopefully Kodiak will have less WK issues going forward.
Honestly I agree the MCR is the safer bet QC wise. Assuming KD has got it's life together then the MCR is not.
If you're ever in need of a forward assist it is quicker to cycle the action than to conduct a FA. The only real reason we sometimes don't like it is because we end up throwing 50c on the floor.