Bullet Jump

I have one rifle that has a long free bore. (Tikka Tac 300wm and a 185 Jugg)

With the bullet seated to the base of the neck there is 0.103" to the rifling.

Question is: Is there any benefit doing bullet seating depth trials with a long jump?

I never reloaded for a long jump, not unless it's a Weatherby rifle and cartridge. When I conduct load development, I always start at .030" jump and decrease from there for increased accuracy. If it's a long throated chamber, I seat the bullet as long a I can, so that the COL just fits in the magazine well.
 
I usually start at .03 off and in and out. I have mostly been loading eldm s and found .03 to .025 is where they work for me.

I am sure you have lots of room to play with seating depth with the 185 g.

My tikka was chambered so long I almost ran out of magazine room to chase it.
 
Watch Erik cortinas “chasing the lands is stupid” video. His method has worked for me.

Not chasing the lands is for his target shooting, where a magnitude of shots are taken. For Fudd hunting rifles, his theory or practice does not apply.
 
I load to mag length, then seat in in .003” deeper increments. Do it out at 200-300 yards. Doing Berger’s method, you will have to just get lucky to hit one of them, and skip past a bunch of good spots.
 
Not chasing the lands is for his target shooting, where a magnitude of shots are taken. For Fudd hunting rifles, his theory or practice does not apply.

Well he does mention in the vid that you can increase Factory ammo accuracy in YOUR rifle by seating the bullets deeper in 3 thou increments until you find a node. I however haven't tried this.
 
I have been testing seating depth over the last 36 rounds, 2 shot group per depth.

First I've started with a known good load that was developed with soft ware ( 7mm-08, 150gn ELD-X, 44.00gn H-4350, 6.25" 3 shot at 1 000 is the best with this load) .

Adjustments were done in 0.005" jumps from base line, which is 0.008" off rifling, 9 sets of two, then another range outing 9 sets of two at 0.003" off. The two tests were done at different but complementary depths to see where this thing goes.

So far I have observed the base line load had two shots very close to touching both trips at base line, as seating went deeper the two shots opened up, then closed up, then opened up again.

Anyone else observe this?

Next trip out I will use the standard set up and COL but will start at 0.1 grains increments lower than 44 gns , probably go with 43.7 thru to 44.5 gns to see if there as anything there.
 
Not chasing the lands is for his target shooting, where a magnitude of shots are taken. For Fudd hunting rifles, his theory or practice does not apply.

Exactly. Those techniques are used by benchrest, F Class shooters that all have custom barrel and chamber.
Great accuracy is obtained for hunting, factory barrel by sticking the SAMI OAL. Choosing and testing bullets, powder charge and primers should get good accurate load without anything else.
 
Last edited:
Well he does mention in the vid that you can increase Factory ammo accuracy in YOUR rifle by seating the bullets deeper in 3 thou increments until you find a node. I however haven't tried this.

Awhile back I picked up a bunch of Winchester factory ammo in 300 WSM so cheap that it was a good deal just for the brass. Naturally I had to try it first, but it shot 2 1/2- 3". I wouldn't waste the barrel shooting that for off-hand practice.

When I got home I pulled one bullet and established that on the factory ammo the jump was well over .100" though I can't remember the exact number anymore. Just by tapping the bullets ahead with an inertia puller and seating them at magazine length minus a smidge for function, groups shrunk to under 1". Hmmmm

Ironically it turned out I didn't need the brass anyway. :rolleyes:
 
I have been testing seating depth over the last 36 rounds, 2 shot group per depth.

First I've started with a known good load that was developed with soft ware ( 7mm-08, 150gn ELD-X, 44.00gn H-4350, 6.25" 3 shot at 1 000 is the best with this load) .

Adjustments were done in 0.005" jumps from base line, which is 0.008" off rifling, 9 sets of two, then another range outing 9 sets of two at 0.003" off. The two tests were done at different but complementary depths to see where this thing goes.

So far I have observed the base line load had two shots very close to touching both trips at base line, as seating went deeper the two shots opened up, then closed up, then opened up again.

Anyone else observe this?

Next trip out I will use the standard set up and COL but will start at 0.1 grains increments lower than 44 gns , probably go with 43.7 thru to 44.5 gns to see if there as anything there.


The seating depth will behave just like a powder node. Pick the middle of the seating node. I go by 0.003” at a time with my 270 and 6.5CM
 
That depends on how tight the throat is.

Every Tikka T3 I've had has had lots of freebore.

Every one of the rifles shot consistently like lazers and all had tight throats.

In a 6.5x55 that I still have, it will shoot everything from 95 grain flat base, hollow points to 160 grain round nose and Berger ELDs into sub moa groups, seated over .100 from the leade.

It's all about how well your reloads fit the chamber and how straight everything is in relation to the axis of the bore.

Loose, sloppy cartridges in a chamber usually don't shoot well and getting them a few thou off the leade will often help to alleviate the problem. You shouldn't have this problem with your Tikka, unless you're using a small base die, etc.

Even at .103 in of jump, the base of your bullet is likely still being held in the neck before it enters the leade

The reason folks try to get close to the leade is to keep their cartridges aligned with the axis of the bore and ensure a straight feed into the bore, with minimal cant.

A+ for bearhunter ^^^^ Right on
 
Watch Erik cortinas “chasing the lands is stupid” video. His method has worked for me.

Erik is FOS sometimes... His advice is not wrong exactly, but it is highly dependent upon the specific set of conditions in his rifle that make the statement temporarily correct for him. He also changes his barrels out long before he gets enough throat erosion to need to chase his lands.

bearhunter above is more true to fact... The correct answer depends entirely upon the length and diametrical clearance of your neck and free bore. Also how many rounds before you plan to change out your barrel.
 
Last edited:
The reason folks try to get close to the leade is to keep their cartridges aligned with the axis of the bore and ensure a straight feed into the bore, with minimal cant.

Maybe. Or maybe their working theory is that being on the lands gives a more consistent shot start pressure? They are still doing the same thing...............
 
Maybe. Or maybe their working theory is that being on the lands gives a more consistent shot start pressure? They are still doing the same thing...............

Lou Murdica did some pressure testing between jump and jam and found that jam generates one pressure spike, whereas jump generates two pressure spikes. This is presumed to affect barrel harmonics.
 
Lou Murdica did some pressure testing between jump and jam and found that jam generates one pressure spike, whereas jump generates two pressure spikes. This is presumed to affect barrel harmonics.

I start on the lands because then there's only one way to go. Typically end up staying there too, but not always.

If I can't reach the lands I regard it as poor planning on my end. Standard length cartridges in magnum length actions take of that for the most part. Some thought to the reamer and or throater take care of the rest.
 
I start on the lands because then there's only one way to go. Typically end up staying there too, but not always.

If I can't reach the lands I regard it as poor planning on my end. Standard length cartridges in magnum length actions take of that for the most part. Some thought to the reamer and or throater take care of the rest.

I did quite a bit of testing on jump myself and found there is a general sweet spot.

From too far away, in my testing, there were wide velocity spreads... I assume it was caused by pressure getting around the bullet before it gets into the rifling and seals off the pressure. As a consequence I also found accuracy was not so good.

As I moved closer to the lands, the velocity spreads reduced incrementally as accuracy improved as well... to a point...

Eventually as I jammed more and more everything started to get worse again and I knew I was in the lands too far.

I do believe though that just lightly touching the lands is a safe all around starting point. Keep in mind that this ignores things like magazine length that may prohibit you from positioning the round where it is optimal relative to the lands.
 
Back
Top Bottom