After using Tavors for some years, I'm pretty sure I would choose an X95 over an AR15 for many situations- except the AR15 can be made to be somewhat more accurate. There is no doubt that the Tavor is more robust and will run longer and dirtier than an AR15. Biggest drawback for the Tavor is spare parts while AR15 parts are everywhere. But parts rarely need to be replaced.
Somewhat more accurate?
That's a bit of an understatement if I ever read one.
On a positive note, I'm glad the cope has been condensed to one thread![]()
After using Tavors for some years, I'm pretty sure I would choose an X95 over an AR15 for many situations- except the AR15 can be made to be somewhat more accurate. There is no doubt that the Tavor is more robust and will run longer and dirtier than an AR15. Biggest drawback for the Tavor is spare parts while AR15 parts are everywhere. But parts rarely need to be replaced.
I really like the AR-15, by far my favourite rifle to date.
That said, I'm really liking Bullpups.
Originally I bought an RDB, and really liked it, enough that I also bought an X-95. I have to sell one eventually, I'm actually having a hard time deciding which one to keep...I'm hopeful my AR-15 will be free one day, otherwise X-95 for the win, clearly it'll take more abuse, but the RDB is a really nice rifle. If the RDB had the same part availability the choice would be that much harder, probably be the one I kept.
Bullpup vs. AR, I guess I'll take the Bullpup for being more old man friendly unsupported, but just barely.
Meh, im in the conventional rifles > bullpups camp still.
Me and a buddy were actually at the range today testing out and zeroing his new RDB mlok that he kindov impulse bought. Brought his SU16F for a comparison. When we switched from the RDB to the SU16 we burst out laughing at how much more comfortable and effective the SU 16 was to shoot. The RDB build construction was however superior and the accuracy notably better aswell.
Id argue that the Eskimos wear snowshoes to walk on snow, they dont wear them year round. And thats because they are not optimal. Just like the bullpup, militarys adopted them for compactness in tight environments. But they aint optimal, and thats why most guns are not bullpups.
Somewhat more accurate?
That's a bit of an understatement if I ever read one.
How much accuracy is needed in a sporting rifle that isn't being shot at paper? I bet an X95 is more capable than the majority of people who own them and outside of a benchrest, 99% of us can't match the accuracy of the rifle.
With the Geissele trigger pack, the rifle will out shoot everyone I've handed it too. I shoots coyotes off the tractor plenty good for my needs.