Burris® Fullfield IV vs Vortex Diamondback Scopes

Kungpow

New member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
BC
Hi there, I just want opinions on which optic would be best suited for a Ruger American Ranch. I am thinking about waiting for an optic that starts a 2x or 2.5x but I am not sure if that would be a significant difference. Both optics are on sale at the moment.

Burris® Fullfield IV - 3-12x42mm with a E3 Reticle - $300

Vortex Diamondback Tactical 3-9x40 with a VMR-1 Reticle - $200

Thanks
 
Hi there, I just want opinions on which optic would be best suited for a Ruger American Ranch. I am thinking about waiting for an optic that starts a 2x or 2.5x but I am not sure if that would be a significant difference. Both optics are on sale at the moment.

Burris® Fullfield IV - 3-12x42mm with a E3 Reticle - $300

Vortex Diamondback Tactical 3-9x40 with a VMR-1 Reticle - $200

Thanks
Both of the scopes mentioned are OK, but if you can visit the store to look through the scope you decide to purchase, I would opt for the unit that can be adjusted to keep both the reticle and image in sharp focus.

One of the reasons these scopes are priced the way they are is "depth of field focus," labor, and materials costs.

Very likely, the lenses in the Burris scopes are made in China, Korea, or? Even more likely, both scopes get their lenses from the same manufacturer.

That means your biggest worry for quality will be the adjustment components, alignment of the lenses, and scope body tubes, which will have an effect on parallax at ranges preceding and exceeding its best focus setting, for image/reticle clarity.

The other issue will be how much of the visible image is sharp and clear. Most low end scopes will be sharp and clear in about 70% of the visible image, deteriorating around the outside edges.

This can be difficult to detect in a small store where they don't have samples or won't sell you the scope they looked through.

Sadly, just because you can focus the store demo sample sharply, doesn't mean the scope in the box, they give you, will do the same.

If you can possibly afford it, opt for a higher end model.

One thing to know about scopes, they are easily removed when you sell the rifle and can be put onto the next rifle without losing quality or value to you personally.

The higher quality the scope is, the longer you will be satisfied with it, and won't be eager to change it out, or spend more when upgrading the rifle.
 
I have a full field and I will be honest I wasn’t expecting much as I never have owned a Burris before and the low price point but I was definitely surprised by the quality of the fullfield and love it
 
I've had one diamondback a number of years ago and it lasted 2 weeks before I exchanged it for a bushnell elite as I wasn't happy with the clarity. I have a burris fullfield lV E1 on my BP gun and it seems decent for the price point. The only complaint I have on it is the extremely stiff mag ring. To be honest though I prefer the older burris fullfield ll to the new model.
 
Good advice from Bearhunter.

I have a couple of the Vortex Diamondback Tactical 3-9x40's and they are a good little scope for the price point. Made in the Philippines, good glass (to my eyes), good range of adjustment, tool-less turrets and moa reticle and adjustments. These seem to go on sale periodically and I think they are a steal at $200. To me they are compatible with the now discontinued Bushnell 10x40 tactical, Leupold Mark AR 9x40, Redfield Revolution 9x40 and the Burris Fullfield II.
Here is a good review of the Vortex Diamondback Tactical 4x12, same scope different power range:

h ttps://snipercentral.com/vortex-diamondback-tactical-4-12x40mm-full-review/

No experience with the Burris Fullfield IV but have and like the Fullfield II in 2x7 and 3x9.
 
Forget the made in China fullfield 4. It's already been replaced with a back to the Phillipines model called just fullfield. The older fullfield 2s and e1s were Phillipines also. I personally like the fullfield 2s bets although I have not owned a new fullfield yet
 
Back
Top Bottom