Tyler, I resent being labelled by you as the "boogey man". You don't know me and it is simply a cheap shot to allege that I am somehow in cahoots with rifle companies.
I never said that a Lee Enfield would blow up. I did say that modern actions are stronger and safer. I don't think you could realistically deny that. They're proofed to much higher pressures and have tigher lockups. This means that they can take a wider range of handloads and are suited for higher intensity cartridges.
As you yourself stated, it will take some work to find a suitable milsurp. In my first post, I mentioned that I paid $40 for an unbelievable P-14 (I'm talking close to 1/2 moa). The point is that these rifles are hard to come by. On the other hand, a new rifle is virtually guaranteed to work and is easy to come by, with no prior inspection required. Most people will agree that once you find a milsurp in really decent condition, the cost goes up. It gets within spitting distance of the Stevens. That's why I think the Stevens is a better, more practical choice, for right now.
I never said that a Lee Enfield would blow up. I did say that modern actions are stronger and safer. I don't think you could realistically deny that. They're proofed to much higher pressures and have tigher lockups. This means that they can take a wider range of handloads and are suited for higher intensity cartridges.
As you yourself stated, it will take some work to find a suitable milsurp. In my first post, I mentioned that I paid $40 for an unbelievable P-14 (I'm talking close to 1/2 moa). The point is that these rifles are hard to come by. On the other hand, a new rifle is virtually guaranteed to work and is easy to come by, with no prior inspection required. Most people will agree that once you find a milsurp in really decent condition, the cost goes up. It gets within spitting distance of the Stevens. That's why I think the Stevens is a better, more practical choice, for right now.



















































