Bushnell 3200 10x tactical

[Buster95]

Good scope for a 17 hmr and for paper punching. I believe this scope have no parallax adjustment and the reticle is a little on thick side.

 

[liberty]

Good scope for the money, but the features of it that you mentioned will make it harder to shoot tiny groups at varying ranges.

IMO parallax adjustment is essential.

 

[rhs]

+1

Lots of elevation adjustment, but you don't really need that for a HMR. Reticle is a bit on the fat side for targets, but OK for hunting. In the 3200 line, I have 2 of the 4-12 AO scopes. One has a fine duplex and the other has some kind of ballistic reticle with fine holdover lines. Have one on a 10/22 and the other on a CZ 452. You would probably find these to be a better optic for your HMR.

 

[Buster95]

I will look for another scope, the thick reticle is not optimum for paper. Thanks guys.

 

[Goose25]

Try a Mueller scope, I did about 5 years ago and don't regret it.

 

[Buster95]

Try a Mueller scope, I did about 5 years ago and don't regret it.

The Mueller APV is a good one?

 

[Goose25]

Pm inbound

 

[306Beach]

Got one on a savage 110. Like it alot. Now that you metioned it, it does have thick lines for the reticle. Oh well good enough for me till I get this gun dialed in right.

 

[dan belisle]

I have a couple, on on a 303 and one on a 300 RUM. They work well and stand up to recoil, all you can ask for the price. - dan

 

[Rod B]

I have had good results with a 6.5 x 25 Mueller Eraticator.

It's a rather large scope on top of my moded Ruger 10-22. However it really works well at 100 & 200 yds. It will also focus well at 20 yds.

No it is not the equal to my Bushnell 4200's, but the price was much less. All things considered I rate the Mueller to be a very good value.