Bushnell / Tasco Warrantee..what a joke

Also,if this one craps out,are you gonna get a third or just add treble hooks to it?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I have two Bushnell Elite 3200's and never had a problem with them. I also have a 20 year old Bushnell Scope Chief IV (the one with the rangefinder and BDC)... Only had one problem with it, it fogged during the fall deer hunt 1993. :evil: At the time I sent it to Bushnell in Richmond Hill, Ontario. I was impressed with their service... They throughly cleaned the scope, adjusted it, and repressurized it. The turn-a-round was 3 weeks and cost me a nominal $10 charge. I have never had a problem since. :D

I also own 2 top end Weaver Varmit scopes, T36, V24 and never had any problems and would recommend them to anyone. I also had an old steel tube 6x Weaver on my childhood Cooey Model 60.... (handed down and down... must have been from the 1950's) and never had a problem. The gun went through a house fire back in 2001 :evil: and the scope still worked. :D

Yeah... a very good point is coming clear in this thread... cheap just isn't good value if it breaks.... a lifetime warranty is useless 600 miles away on a one week hunt

Amen BigRedd
 
I think it boils down to wether or not you are buying the quality scope or the cheep modles. Most of my rifle scopes are Tasco aswell as the two scope I have on my turkey guns , but I also have the same scope Chilly had the problems with as that was all I could find for the rifle scatter gun. Now I was a little worried about the price at the time because Cheep spells Cheep in my mined in scopes. I have not set this scope up yet but will be doing so in the next while. At the very lest I know where to head for if it don't work :wink:

Sorry Chilly , but your problem was in my mined for a while now, now you got me scared ! :shock: ...BT
 
Back in the day :roll: I used Tasco exclusively, that's what I could afford & always had good luck with them. The only one I had go bad was a 4 X 40 I purchased late 70s, but then Ruger #3s in 45-70 will do that :wink: . The warranty on that scope was very fast, less than 10 days including reg shipping both ways to Toronto :)
I understand the new Tascos are &*^"?, can't say haven't had one :!:
 
I am an "I told you so" kind of guy... and If you choose to put a Tasco or a Simmons or any of the many other Off-Shore Junk on your firearm... I will tell you... Chilly hates me right now :wink:
I have seen a lot of Bushnell reddots come back pooched... none get repaired... just replaced :idea:
 
well the Tasco Titan model is their TOP TOP TOP of the line and costs about $260 so its far from cheap....with that in mind I was convinced that the failure I had was not going to happen upon purchase....WRONG! I've tossed the new one back on the slug gun and have not gone to invest in better rings as the Titan is a 30mm tube and if I am gonna replace it I'd go to 1" so can't see spending $60 on Burris zee's. I've got the lifetime warrantee on this one too so if it pooches again I'll get a new one and sell it right away and replace it with a Burris. Yes Redd is a "told ya so" type guy but he didn't own a leupold or Burris until he met me...what was it you were using Redd???? I think you swore by bushnell didn't ya? Its all a learning curve fellas...so listen to those that have travelled the bend before :wink:
 
flyby said:
anyone had any experience with nikon scopes?
Nikon are pretty good. In the last few years they have started a nasty trend of moving production out of Japan to cheaper countries. There hasn't been alot of moaning over thier quality though. They still seem to be keeping things good.



Chilly Willy said:
well the Tasco Titan model is their TOP TOP TOP of the line
Yeah but its TASCOs line :idea:
I know the Titan when they first came out were 500$s and moved like molasses in the middle of February, uphill. Then they started dropping the price. Even at 500$ they weren't worth it. At 250, useful for an occasional use scope, but not really for a hunting gun.
 
The Bushnell turnaround is under 3 months,compared to the Leupold at under 3 weeks.The Leupold Vari-X III was brand new,the Bushnell Scopechief was over 25 years old. Both top line. That's why you pay a least a couple of hundred more for the Leupold.
 
Yes Redd is a "told ya so" type guy but he didn't own a leupold or Burris until he met me...what was it you were using Redd????
That is not exactly true Chilly... I was using Leups on my shotguns and Elites on my rifles... long before I met ya... you did get me a couple of deals though 8)
The Burris scopes were off my Radar until recently though... :wink:
 
coltfan said:
I'd take a 4200 over a Rifleman...
Leup. makes inexpensive crap too....
Bushnell makes good stuff....

You are comparing Leupold's bottom of the line series against Bushnell's top of the line "Elite" series.Having said that, I'd still take the rifleman,but thats just me.
 
I have had good luck w/Bushnell in the past, but since the Tasco addition to the line the warrenty service is terrible slow.

I sent a scope to Bushnell in June and haven't seen it since :roll: ...... "Be patient", they say :lol:

SC........................
 
I won't pretend to come to the rescue of Tasco but I will voice my opinion on their scopes. Pre and post Bushnell Tasco's are no different than other scopes in their price range for quality and durability. Don't forget that Bushnell bought Tasco and kept their best lines. Unless we are saying that Bushnell doesn't know anything about optics we have to have faith that they made the right decision to keep these lines in the market place. After all with so many 3200 and 4200 lovers out there they do know something about what the public wants in optics and what they are prepared to pay. The jinks of the situation is that if we could all afford top end optics that is what we would install on our firearms. All our arguments and opinions are based on what we can afford and none would hesitate for a minute in upgrading to better optics if we could afford it. Tasco Titans are for all intents great scopes probably the best scope in that price range and better than alot of pricier scopes, they are very highly regarded in europe as a great buy. I only own 2 Tasco scopes, I didn't buy them new and they are both mounted on heavy recoiling rifles, they have withstood hundreds of shots and hold zero as well as my S&B, Swarovski and Leupold scopes. Their clarity is impressive given their modest price and will reccomend them over any 3200 any day of the week, they have better resolution, clarity and edge to edge sharpness. You can have a problem with any scope and as long as it's not a reoccuring problem I would say it's normal. Tasco put out a great product but their name was never sinonomous with high end scopes and this brought the Titan down but at $250 they can hold their own against any other scope out there in that price range, period. Comparing them to scopes costing double their cost is not fair but it could be very surprising if you had the oportunity to look through both of them at the same time, try it. The Titan is also one of the few scopes that is also made in Japan,that's never a bad thing, don't forget that Tasco was the company responsible for bringing the Super Sniper to market, I never owned one but I know they are highly regarded in their price range.
bigbull
 
Dosing said:
BIGREDD said:
Yeah... a very good point is coming clear in this thread... cheap just isn't good value if it breaks.... a lifetime warranty is useless 600 miles away on a one week hunt :!:
Just reinforcing how right BIGREDD is on this. I hated listening to people whine about crap they bought, took out for a once in a lifetime hunt, only for it to break. Then you see the Tasco scope, on the Rem auto loader, mounted in Weaver's cheapest rings.....
I see your points but unfortunately some of us don't have the money to buy the best stuff for the job and so have to make do. :|
I have 2 Tasco scopes; a World Class .22 6x40 on my Anschutz .22lr and a World Class MAG IV 3-12x40AO on my bubba'd k98.
They do the job.
Would I like a Burris, Leupold or Zeiss? :shock:
You're bloody right I would but it's unlikely to happen soon. :roll:
And for the record, Tasco's customer service here in Oz is without fault.
 
If you can afford to take a week off work and buy a 700 dollar rifle to hunt with you can afford a good quality scope. :wink:
Bushnell bought Tascoe to eliminate the low end competition... not because they made quality... :idea:
 
Who said I can afford to take a week off work?
I can barely afford petrol at the moment and it's set to rise again.
And who said any of my rifles were $700?
They still shoot well enough to take hunting.
I do my shooting on a budget, BIGREDD.
I appreciate you point of view but unfortunately I have no other options.
So far I guess I've been lucky with my purchases.
One day, and I mean one day, I will have a good rifle built with a great scope.
The K98 certainly deserves something better but it won't get one until I finally get the money to re-barrel and re-stock it.
But if the 4-12x works well and doesn't play up why should I complain.
And the 6x40 has been the means for many dead rabbits.
I guess you have to be satisfied with what you can afford.
Don't worry, when I buy a really good rifle I'll sink some more into the scope.
 
kombi1976 said:
Dosing said:
BIGREDD said:
Yeah... a very good point is coming clear in this thread... cheap just isn't good value if it breaks.... a lifetime warranty is useless 600 miles away on a one week hunt :!:
Just reinforcing how right BIGREDD is on this. I hated listening to people whine about crap they bought, took out for a once in a lifetime hunt, only for it to break. Then you see the Tasco scope, on the Rem auto loader, mounted in Weaver's cheapest rings.....
I see your points but unfortunately some of us don't have the money to buy the best stuff for the job and so have to make do. :|
I have 2 Tasco scopes; a World Class .22 6x40 on my Anschutz .22lr and a World Class MAG IV 3-12x40AO on my bubba'd k98.
They do the job.
Would I like a Burris, Leupold or Zeiss? :shock:
You're bloody right I would but it's unlikely to happen soon. :roll:
And for the record, Tasco's customer service here in Oz is without fault.

You are right Kombi, many people cant afford better scopes than what they are using,but,generally speaking,Most guys(at least in my neck of the woods)can.

I talkin about the guy that plays pick up hockey (usually no hell),but he's got a ####in $190 composite hockey stick and $480 pair af skates.
What has he got fixed to the top of his shiny $1000 Browning Bar?.....Thats right! an $89 bushnell that he bought a Wal-mart.(and fixed poorly I might add) Is he gonna play pro hockey? ...Not likely. :roll:

Same guy has a $1400 set of Taylor made golf clubs,but its not likely he will ever even come close to par even at a lousy course where he pays 45 bucks for round of golf. :roll:

These guys are the NORM not the exception(at least in my experience)I KNOW these guys (and I'm not refering to anyone here on this thread)and they think I am the ####ing lunatic cause I spent 7-9 hundred on a scope!
#### ,even $300 for a fixed 4x, and they say" WHAT"! :shock:

I'm not saying that expensive scopes and MORE importantly mounts and rings will make you a better shot ,cause that is just nonsence,what I am saying, is that the quality of optics and again, more importantly, mounting systems that most of these people use, are almost, BOUND to fail.
I am no exception myself.I own seven Leupolds.Leupolds arent the best thing out there and I know that if I thinned my small herd of rifles out I could without a doubt buy a couple of higher end models to properly attach to the remaining ones.Can and will a Leupold fail? Sure, and so can a Ziess or what have you,but you dont see it in the numbers that the walmart specials do.I have never had a Leupold that I have purchased NEW, fail,but that doesnt mean they wont,and if one does the problem is addressed quickly(at least here in Canada)

I am fortunate enough in that I have a farmer neighbor who allows me to target shoot in a pit just up the road from my place.He doesnt mind if I drag afew friends/co-workers in for a shoot the odd time.So around this time of the year I have guys asking to come out for a shoot.

These guys say stuff like,"just wanna make sure my 270 is still dialed in for the moose hunt,it shouldnt take long,just afew shots".I WISH :shock: .Shotgun patterns off the bags are the norm. NOW, when they are having trouble and look to me for suggestions,I say "attach treble hooks to that POS and go troll for Pike or if you dont want to turn it into a lure, at least get some quality mounts and rings."Very rarely do I ever suspect the rifle is the culprit.Its almost always the scope and or mounts.

Now Chilly bought the best Tasco money could buy and is not getting treated the way I know Leupold treated me(at least)He's getting the business,as they say.You live and learn.
You (judging by some pics I have seen) are quite an adept hunter of Roos and such , obviously know your equipment, practise quite a little bit and if your stuff is workin for you that is great.When it screws up I'm sure you address the problem.I'm SURE your not content with a 10 inch group at 100yds,off bags.However the fact remains that a good percentage of the people I have seen, are.
Now having said all that crap, when I see a game animal I start to shake with excitement ,and couldnt hit the water if I fell out of a boat,(at least off hand),but at least I cant blame the equipment,only myself if something goes wrong.(I usually will go out of my way for a stump or tree to help,or use a bi-pod)
I think we owe it to these animals to make sure they are taken as cleanly as possible.God knows I have screwed that up more than once aswell.
Sorry I may have gotten off subject a bit.I guess its all an ethics thing.
Again Sorry about the rant, but I think MOST of us could afford, at least, a little better.
 
Thanks, guys.
I understood why you were peeved and, yeah, you're right.
I'm real careful that I can get a half decent group from any of my guns.
It's part of the reason my Rem Mod 6 is pissing me off so much and the whole reason it will get a peep sight if I can find an appropriate one.
And as far as mounts and go I am fairly serious, with the exception of the cheap & dodgy dovetail mount rings on the Anschutz. :|
My ShtLE 303/25 has a Lynx bridge mount with stud mount rings and the Mauser has a Leupold bridge mount with Leupold super high rings.
The scopes aren't going anywhere!
As far as being an adept roo shooter........ha!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Haven't had a better laugh in a long time. :p
Let's say I'm careful about my shots and I've still got a lot to learn.
 
Back
Top Bottom