Here's my take.
1. Those who buy Norc's or other knockoffs aren't looking to get into serious competition, or require exceptional reliability. If they are, they will smith the living hell out of it till the warranty is void anyway. They are somewhat "diposable" toys, plain and simple.
2. Most who buy Norc's wouldn't or couldn't afford a Dlask or a Socom rig. It is not a case of taking or eroding Canadian business, because the business would not exist without the Chinese "discount" grade rifles.
3. Those companies may get cheaper with time, but never to the price of the Norc's. The Canadian options are quality rifles for those who want a quality rifle. They would be foolish to make a cheap version, as it would undermine thier name in the industry. Many excellent companies have been sunk by the "Walmart Effect" (builidng a discount knockoff, that erodes consumer confidence in the entire line).
You would be better off arguing that these rifles are eroding business for Ruger and Remington than the small specialty market. Most folks who buy these, buy them for a cheap but fun semi-auto range toy. If they couldn't afford or justify one of these, they would more than likely buy an SKS, or a Garand, or mod the hell out of a 10/22.
Several Canadian businesses actually benefit from these knock off's too. Just to name a few:
1. Dealers and importers
2. Accessory dealers
3. Gunsmiths
4. Ammunition manufacturers, importers, and dealers
5. The shipping and trucking industry that moves these things around.
The business levels to all of these secondary industries is built on mass numbers of cheap imports brought in and sold across Canada, and the dollar value associated with Norc owner's alone is likley far far higher than both Dlask and Socom's annual balance sheets combined.
1. Those who buy Norc's or other knockoffs aren't looking to get into serious competition, or require exceptional reliability. If they are, they will smith the living hell out of it till the warranty is void anyway. They are somewhat "diposable" toys, plain and simple.
2. Most who buy Norc's wouldn't or couldn't afford a Dlask or a Socom rig. It is not a case of taking or eroding Canadian business, because the business would not exist without the Chinese "discount" grade rifles.
3. Those companies may get cheaper with time, but never to the price of the Norc's. The Canadian options are quality rifles for those who want a quality rifle. They would be foolish to make a cheap version, as it would undermine thier name in the industry. Many excellent companies have been sunk by the "Walmart Effect" (builidng a discount knockoff, that erodes consumer confidence in the entire line).
You would be better off arguing that these rifles are eroding business for Ruger and Remington than the small specialty market. Most folks who buy these, buy them for a cheap but fun semi-auto range toy. If they couldn't afford or justify one of these, they would more than likely buy an SKS, or a Garand, or mod the hell out of a 10/22.
Several Canadian businesses actually benefit from these knock off's too. Just to name a few:
1. Dealers and importers
2. Accessory dealers
3. Gunsmiths
4. Ammunition manufacturers, importers, and dealers
5. The shipping and trucking industry that moves these things around.
The business levels to all of these secondary industries is built on mass numbers of cheap imports brought in and sold across Canada, and the dollar value associated with Norc owner's alone is likley far far higher than both Dlask and Socom's annual balance sheets combined.
Last edited:


















































