Please read my submission again.
I was charged with knowingly being in possession of unregistered and prohib. (barrel length) firearms. The officer in the field has NO IDEA about antiques.
ALL PAPERWORK FOR ANTIQUES and CERTS for NON and RESTRICTEDS WAS PRESENT AND SEIZED at the time. Made no difference to the cops. They are not the judge.
After you spend the night in jail, you will go home to find it totally ripped apart. I mean TOTALLY torn apart! My bed was stood up against the wall! LOL All drawers and closets emtied and left on the floor.
Nine months (hanging over your head for that time is the very real fact that, at the time, gun charge is a 3 year minimum jail sentence) and many many many thousands of lawyer dollars later, YES, the crown will finally have to admit they were wrong. TOO BAD, SO SAD, YOU STILL LOSE.
Yes, you can sue. 10-12 years of time and 1/4 mil. $. I won but at what cost?
So, all I am saying, from my experience, is The rcmp Letter is not the "get out of jail card" we would hope it is.
As a responsible dealer and generally a good guy, please let guys know discression with use/display is important.
Your luck with officers in the field is probably a matter of the odds but don't discount political agenda also.
This is what caught me. Mayor david miller and his lap dog bill blair needed a collector as an example. May be you next.
That is alarming, to say the least. You are not the first one to tell me such a story, but all of them - no matter how frightening and frustrating - ended up being cleared in the end. Yes, the letter did not help at the time, but the owner and his lawyer knowing for a fact that the gun(s) was/were antiques sure helped them sleep at night through the process. Imagine if you had a gun confiscated that you only THINK is antique, but until the cops and the court determine it to be so, you would be hanging over the abyss. I would still rather have mine "lettered" than just take a seller's word for it. Again, the letter is only as good as the information submitted to the Technical Division.
As far as ammo and carrying it around loaded goes, I think we're getting off topic here. I have had a few conversations with the head honcho at technical about this and his answer was, quite rightly, ammo, transport and discharge are "enforcement issues", completely out of the realm of status declaration.
OP - I looked at the Bonham's ad and your Webley-Bentley may be okay, but still there is nothing to suggest definitely that it was made pre-1898. Chas Osbourne was registered in Birmingham until 1900, the proof marks were still used after 1898, and it does not say "Webley" anywhere that I can see. You can try to get an opinion from the technical division in advance of the auction, if there is time. Send them an e-mail with a link to the web page. If they are not too busy, they will give you an assessment. I have done this occasionally.
Good luck!