- Location
- Southern Ontario
Hey guys,
I've been lurking on CGN a while now, and having recently acquired my RPAL, I've decided to make my first handgun purchase. I'm looking for some advice and maybe some guidance, here, so bear with me.
My objective is to shoot at the local range maybe twice a week, have a good time and become a decent shot along the way. My budget is somewhere around a thousand dollars, counting my club membership, the pistol itself, and maybe a single stage press and assorted reloading gizmos. Realistically though, that puts my budget closer to $1100, all things considered.
In any case, I'm asking for advice because I consider myself an impulsive buyer, and I've had very severe cases of buyer's remorse in the past. This post essentially serves to minimize buyers remorse, via the advice of experienced shooters like yourselves.
So from what I've read, I should be buying a .22LR pistol to get a feel for the basics of handgun form and shooting principles and whatnot. Currently, though, I'm leaning towards 9mm instead, mainly because it seems like that would be more fun to shoot than .22LR, and easier to learn on than .45 ACP. You also might notice that some of my choices are largely based on looks and history, as opposed to hard facts on accuracy or what-have-you. That's probably because I'm attracted to firearms that have some history or significance (and it helps if it looks nice, too).
The handguns that are really calling to me are the Springfield Armory XD-9, the IMI Baby Desert Eagle, the Baretta M9, and to a lesser extent the 1911 in 9mm. This is basically where I need some help. I just don't want to make an irrational decision based off a few reviews and some word-of-mouth. So I ask you to help me reason this out. Also, feel free to correct any noobish misconceptions I likely have concerning any of the above firearms. That'll probably help too!
I like the idea of the XD-9 because it seems like a tight, reliable package that'll be fun to shoot and accurate to boot. From what I gather, it's a lot like a Glock, except better looking. I'm a bit weary about the whole plastic frame thing though. Does that make it any more frail? How much more recoil does a plastic frame translate into, really?
I love the idea of the Baby Desert Eagle, because, well, quite frankly, it's just badass. Aside from that, I'm not too sure about this whole "having a double-action on the first shot and a single-action on the next shots," thing. I've been told to stay away from double-action pistols on account of the lowered accuracy and harder trigger pull. On top of that, something just doesn't feel right about having a Desert Eagle chambered in 9mm. Is that just me? Someone convince me otherwise, please! It seems to me that this would overall be a sturdier, more fun gun to have. How does it compare with regards to reliability and accuracy, though?
Speaking of which, could someone enlighten me on the topic of plastic vs. metal frame?
I like the idea of the Baretta M9 because it's a classic firearm that has alot of history too. It looks good and sturdy and fun. This applies to the 1911 as well. I don't know much else about either, though, so could someone enlighten me?
All things considered, to me, the most important trait for a firearm is the way it feels, and I guess that's very subjective. I really want a handgun that feels sturdy, reliable, and solid. I want accuracy, and some history, and most importantly, lots of fun. So tell me about these firearms, and any others you might recommend. Tell me what you feel my best choice would be. Should I even consider anything bigger than 9mm as a first firearm? And really, is there anything wrong with chambering a Desert Eagle in 9mm? I mean, maybe I'm off here, but isn't the Desert Eagle classically a larger caliber weapon? Would I regret not getting one in .40 S&W or .45 ACP instead? Gah! I just can't deal with another case of buyer's remorse! Help!
Canadian_Sapper
I've been lurking on CGN a while now, and having recently acquired my RPAL, I've decided to make my first handgun purchase. I'm looking for some advice and maybe some guidance, here, so bear with me.
My objective is to shoot at the local range maybe twice a week, have a good time and become a decent shot along the way. My budget is somewhere around a thousand dollars, counting my club membership, the pistol itself, and maybe a single stage press and assorted reloading gizmos. Realistically though, that puts my budget closer to $1100, all things considered.
In any case, I'm asking for advice because I consider myself an impulsive buyer, and I've had very severe cases of buyer's remorse in the past. This post essentially serves to minimize buyers remorse, via the advice of experienced shooters like yourselves.
So from what I've read, I should be buying a .22LR pistol to get a feel for the basics of handgun form and shooting principles and whatnot. Currently, though, I'm leaning towards 9mm instead, mainly because it seems like that would be more fun to shoot than .22LR, and easier to learn on than .45 ACP. You also might notice that some of my choices are largely based on looks and history, as opposed to hard facts on accuracy or what-have-you. That's probably because I'm attracted to firearms that have some history or significance (and it helps if it looks nice, too).
The handguns that are really calling to me are the Springfield Armory XD-9, the IMI Baby Desert Eagle, the Baretta M9, and to a lesser extent the 1911 in 9mm. This is basically where I need some help. I just don't want to make an irrational decision based off a few reviews and some word-of-mouth. So I ask you to help me reason this out. Also, feel free to correct any noobish misconceptions I likely have concerning any of the above firearms. That'll probably help too!
I like the idea of the XD-9 because it seems like a tight, reliable package that'll be fun to shoot and accurate to boot. From what I gather, it's a lot like a Glock, except better looking. I'm a bit weary about the whole plastic frame thing though. Does that make it any more frail? How much more recoil does a plastic frame translate into, really?
I love the idea of the Baby Desert Eagle, because, well, quite frankly, it's just badass. Aside from that, I'm not too sure about this whole "having a double-action on the first shot and a single-action on the next shots," thing. I've been told to stay away from double-action pistols on account of the lowered accuracy and harder trigger pull. On top of that, something just doesn't feel right about having a Desert Eagle chambered in 9mm. Is that just me? Someone convince me otherwise, please! It seems to me that this would overall be a sturdier, more fun gun to have. How does it compare with regards to reliability and accuracy, though?
Speaking of which, could someone enlighten me on the topic of plastic vs. metal frame?
I like the idea of the Baretta M9 because it's a classic firearm that has alot of history too. It looks good and sturdy and fun. This applies to the 1911 as well. I don't know much else about either, though, so could someone enlighten me?
All things considered, to me, the most important trait for a firearm is the way it feels, and I guess that's very subjective. I really want a handgun that feels sturdy, reliable, and solid. I want accuracy, and some history, and most importantly, lots of fun. So tell me about these firearms, and any others you might recommend. Tell me what you feel my best choice would be. Should I even consider anything bigger than 9mm as a first firearm? And really, is there anything wrong with chambering a Desert Eagle in 9mm? I mean, maybe I'm off here, but isn't the Desert Eagle classically a larger caliber weapon? Would I regret not getting one in .40 S&W or .45 ACP instead? Gah! I just can't deal with another case of buyer's remorse! Help!
Canadian_Sapper
Last edited:


















































