Can a Cooey be accurate? Modded Cooey Project

RabidM4U5

BANNED
CGN frequent flyer
BANNED
Rating - 95.2%
20   1   0
Location
Ontario
Here's a fun one for y'all from the Rab Lab (heh) I get these thoughts in my mind "what if....?" and I just have to know, so I dive into projects and experiments most wouldn't bother with. I found a suitable Cooey 750 on the EE, single shot bolt action model made by Winchester, which also had a surprisingly nicely figured stock. Since I was going to be re-barreling it, not just any Cooey would do, as a number of them have tube mags attached to the barrel or some other issue that would prevent one from replacing the barrel easily, but this 750 was free and clear to knock that barrel out! I had the gunsmith who fitted the barrel also drill and tap for a Weaver side mount scope base, as this model was essentially iron sight only with no means of attaching scope rings.





Now, what barrel would one fit to a Cooey?? I just wasn't going to put a Lilja or similar on it... but I did have a spare kickin' around... The old Anschütz made sporter barrel that I took off my Weatherby XXII. Hey wait a minute... wasn't that barrel a "dud"? Yes, it was. So that was part 2 of this project, first question was "Can a Cooey be accurate?", second question was "Can I fix a "dud" barrel?". Two birds, one stone, but a wee bit of a gamble... As I evaluated the take-off Annie barrel, I found that the main issue was a severe constriction in the bore several inches ahead of the chamber. Measuring the slug with a micrometer showed it to be 0.002" tighter than a slug just pushed an inch into the muzzle then back out, that ain't good! Past that restriction, the slugging felt decent, some minor inconsistencies but nothing that some lapping couldn't fix.

So, I lapped the barrel with 400 grit powder mixed into JB bore paste, making an effort to induce a taper from breech to muzzle. Slugging felt great after the lapping, but there was still that restriction... So I had to lop off a couple inches from the breech. After cutting an inch and a half off, I measured out where I felt the restriction, and marked the barrel. I just had the gunsmith remove another 1/2" off the breech, then the chambering would kill the restriction so that I wouldn't loose too much length off the barrel. The lapping washed out the rifling at the muzzle, so I had to cut a 1/2" off the muzzle to get the rifling depth back, and I recrowned with my Manson crowning tool.



Once I got the rifle back from the smith with the barrel fitted and scope base attached, I found he had also bedded the barrel at the fore-end in a way that put quite a bit of up-pressure on the barrel. I "gave it a shot" :cool: but results were mostly "meh". I saw potential, though, but I had to work on it my way. I removed the bedding under the barrel, then prepped it for action bedding. I left a small patch of wood around the action screw hole to locate the action height, and built up a small pad under the barrel at the fore end of the stock with aluminum tape to center it. Bedding was done with Devcon steel putty.





Once that cured, I added a couple more layers of aluminum tape under the barrel to put just a slight up-pressure on it, and then full length bedded the barrel with Ultra Black gasket making compound. I polished inside the receiver with 1500 grit sandpaper and the bolt as well, since a large part of the bolt body moves with the striker and it was binding a little, so this freed it up to move smoothly and improve ignition. I had wanted to take apart the bolt and clean-up/polish the striker itself and modify the strike footprint (which is very large) but it seems a special "fork" type tool is needed to unscrew the striker from inside the bolt body. I just flooded it with gun oil, then worked it manually to get as much dirt and crap out of there as I could instead. It moved fairly smoothly, so it's probably not critical to polish the striker at this time.



Results time! I warmed up with SK Biathlon Sport, as is typical the first group from a clean, cold barrel was a write-off. It seemed to take 25 rounds to settle down and shoot, but then hey, looks like my bedding just might have done the trick ;)



I shot Lapua Polar Biathlon next, but that target is going to be posted in a different thread :p

After that, RWS Rifle Match and RWS Rifle Match "S" were on deck, and that was it for the day with the Cooey. I went to 100 yards and did some killer shooting with my CZ 455 Custom in the calming winds of the late evening, man that rifle just seems to keep getting better and better. Anyway, here's the RWS targets from the Cooey.





So, I would say now that 1. Yes, a Cooey can be made accurate, and 2. I can fix a "dud" barrel. Still get some random fliers here and there, but it's shooting sub 1/2" on average, most groups under 1/2" actually, with some really nice ones too. Keeping in mind there is still less than 500 rounds down the tube with the freshly cut chamber, I expect it to continue to improve with time as the leade smooths out and becomes fluid. Already better results than I ever got with the barrel on my Weatherby XXII, and I put a couple thousand through it trying to get it to shoot the 1/2" challenge with that rifle but just had no luck. Now I know why the barrel didn't perform, and I'm glad I was able to salvage it and turn it into a neat little project. If I could only get myself a lathe.... :wave:
 
My good friend has a stock Cooey 75, it was his dad's barn rifle, and is rusty and never had any accuracy work done to it; stock iron sights. He wins every open sight competition he enters in our area. Everyone laughs at it, but no one can out-shoot it. Cooey's are accurate.
 
We had a local smith here who took great pride in building accurate Cooey "sleeper" completion rifles. They will shoot with the Anschuts for sure.
Here is one we built in .308 with a left over Palma barrrel.
RIYcidr.jpg
 
I have used Cooeys for some time...Mod 38 open site which puts a round where it is aimed...and a 600 tuber which goes open or scope (grooved from factory) which also dots "i"s with great accurcy. I have never have come across a 75 (circa 1939-1969 somewhere i think??) and the 750 which was newer and made by winchester.
Very interesting to actually modify one
 
Thats very impressive, not many fellas would believe that a Cooey would be capable of those groups. Congrats on a fine job!
 
Thanks guys, this was a fun one for sure!

It only proves the point all things being equal with enough skill and effort you can get great results from just about any firearm

Yeah, what I am coming to understand is that the barrel is the heart of accuracy lets say it represents 95% on a rifle's accuracy potential. A flawless barrel with excellent workmanship on the chambering and crown will give you great results when properly fitted to just about any decent action. I've seen what a Lilja barrel can do on a Remington 597, and now this... The action does matter, but it's not a major player in the accuracy pie. Those custom actions do make a difference, but it is very expensive and you're just fighting for breadcrumbs. Breadcrumbs are what win Bench Rest competitions, though, so they have their place.

I like to know the "why" of things, like "why didn't this Weatherby XXII barrel shoot on the OEM rifle?" It was made by Anschütz, after all, and as such comes with an expectation of performance. Well, there are certain criteria that a barrel must meet in order to deliver rimfire accuracy, and no factory production facility puts in the necessary work and QC checks to guarantee each and every single barrel they produce checks all of the boxes. Anschütz at least chambers, crowns, and fits their barrels very well, but evidently they do not check for bore diameter consistency and hand lap if deficiencies are found, as was the case with this barrel. Selecting which end of the blank will be the muzzle is arbitrary, and they are all cut to a specified length for the rifle model, rather than the length the barrel "needs" to be based on slugging to put the crown at the right spot. It leaves so much to chance and does not assure the best performance possible out of each barrel, no custom rifle smith would approach barrel fitting this way, but such is the necessity of a production environment.

I'm not one to throw my hands up in defeat, sell a dud rifle, and try my luck again with a new one. Any rifle can be fixed, even if it means putting a new barrel on it. Barrels can even be fixed, and lucky for me I found a smith who does great work for a very reasonable price. Find the flaws, eliminate them, check all the prerequisite accuracy boxes, and you'll have a great shooting rifle. It's a simple formula once you know what a rifle needs to shoot well.
 
It proves the point that you make about the chamber, barrel, and crown being the most important part of accuracy. The receiver as mentioned just holds it all together and feeds the cartridge.
 
I was able to achieve like 2.6" group at 110 Y with the factory peep sight. With my Eaton ranger ( Cooey 78 ) And I was pretty impressed with that. Probably would do better with a scope. Not bad I say for a 80$ rifle.
 
I was able to achieve like 2.6" group at 110 Y with the factory peep sight. With my Eaton ranger ( Cooey 78 ) And I was pretty impressed with that. Probably would do better with a scope. Not bad I say for a 80$ rifle.

That is pretty good shooting, I can;t even see through a peep sight anymore...
 
Back
Top Bottom