Can a Rossi M92 lever gun in 45 colt be rechambered to 454 Casull?

Two points to consider.
45 colt chambers are typically cut quite oversized due to outdated specs. 454, I'd expect would not clean up the old chamber properly.

45 colt with starline brass, and ruger level handloads will meet or exceed most people's recoil comfort level in a lightweight carbine, with performance to match. If a 325 grain cast bullet at 1500fps is not enough oomph, a 45-70 would be the most logical step up.

Regards,
Stomp

The M92 is a hell of a lot lighter and handier than any .45-70. 300grn jacketed bullets at 2100fps are also easily done. I'd say the OP knows exactly what he wants.
 
2100 fps from a 16" barreled action with a 300gr jacketed bullet? Damn, that's fast. Looks like I have quite a safety margin still at 1500 fps. What powder are you using to get those velocities? I have been playing with H110 and the 300gr XTP's, any other powder or jacketed bullets you'd recommend?
 
2100 fps from a 16" barreled action with a 300gr jacketed bullet? Damn, that's fast. Looks like I have quite a safety margin still at 1500 fps. What powder are you using to get those velocities? I have been playing with H110 and the 300gr XTP's, any other powder or jacketed bullets you'd recommend?

20" sorry, i think the 16" is just barely under 2000. That's with factory Hornady ammo. You can duplicate it with the following

32grns H110
1.745" OAL
Rem 7.5
Starline or Hornady brass

I put a very heavy crimp on them as I also use them in a Ruger SRH Toklat.
 
The M92 is a hell of a lot lighter and handier than any .45-70. 300grn jacketed bullets at 2100fps are also easily done. I'd say the OP knows exactly what he wants.

I agree, the 92 is much lighter. The 454 offers increased performance by greatly increased pressure, whereas the 45-70 at low pressure eclipses it handily with much heavier bullets. I like lower pressure, but that's just me.

More important is the chamber specs, colt chambers being oversized, case life is reduced with high pressure loads. Reaming to 454 will not solve that.

Cheers,
Stomp
 
What is the oversized chamber comment based on? Just curious. I haven't owned any .45C rifles but I also don't recall ever hearing about it in the M92s.
 
What is the oversized chamber comment based on? Just curious. I haven't owned any .45C rifles but I also don't recall ever hearing about it in the M92s.

SAMMI specs. The 45 colt is spec'd at .480" but most rifle/carbine chambers are larger than that. Brass is approximately .475"
Ruger revolver chambers in 45colt are much tighter, so higher pressure loads are no problem. I've seen large chambers on rossi, winchester, and browning 45 colts. Some are grossly oversize, and some are less so, but none have been cut to fit modern brass properly. If, by some twist of fate, the OP's colt has a tight chamber, then this problem is moot, but I haven't seen a tight chambered 45 colt (long gun) yet, except the one I chambered myself with a custom made reamer.

Stomp
 
45 Colt case Length - 1.285", 454 Casull case length - 1.383"

Will your rifle feed, chamber and eject a 45 Colt dummy round with an OAL of 1.800"? You'll need a bullet 300 gr or heavier to have the length needed for the bullet to be gripped sufficiently by the neck.

If so, you've essentially got a 454 Casull with a short neck.
 
45 Colt case Length - 1.285", 454 Casull case length - 1.383"

Will your rifle feed, chamber and eject a 45 Colt dummy round with an OAL of 1.800"? You'll need a bullet 300 gr or heavier to have the length needed for the bullet to be gripped sufficiently by the neck.

If so, you've essentially got a 454 Casull with a short neck.

I'm sure he was asking about a proper modification. There would be no need to load short.
 
.45 Colt should space on the rim not the neck, so its brass with a bullet seated to .454 Casull overall length might be a test whether .454 will fit, though a proper .454 dummy round would be a better check.

Longer magnum rounds, both here and with .38/.357, are an opportunity for newer guns that don't want the extra pressure to refuse to chamber the longer round, but there's no guarantee of this feature, most especially in older pre-magnum designs.

There is some pre-.454 tradition of people loading rather toasty hot .45 rounds, but whether you're skating onto excessively thin ice there is an unknown until you blow up a gun. Me, I stick with what the gun says it can handle and get a bigger gun if I want more.

(Likewise, note that seating bullets to other than the proper OAL will do interesting things to the pressure curve and may not lead to a good day at the range.)
 
In a modern model 92 action the 45 Colt should be able to do anything the .44 Mag can, likely better even. I currently shoot 300gr XTP's at 1500 fps out of my 16" R92, pretty sure I could likely drive them a bit faster still without issue. A hard cast 300-325gr bullet might do even better and would no doubt penetrate better with minimal to no expansion. Definitely on my list of things to try sooner than later.

This guy: https://leverguns.com/articles/paco/45coltlevergun.htm
has hot rodded the 45 Colt in the Rossi 92 action beyond what I thought was possible(and a bit past where I would likely try to get mine to, but it's impressive nonetheless). Makes these small carbines heavy hitters for their size and weight.

John Linebaugh also has an interesting read for loading the 45 Colt up to impressive levels, though his information is geared more towards shooting it from Ruger single action revolvers, or his that he makes from the Ruger frames I believe - https://www.johnlinebaughcustomsixguns.com/writings

45 Colt would be perfect in the ‘92, only problem I see is Sask went and put the 45 Colt on the “not approved for hunting” list.
Seriously, who the F comes up with these ideas? Morons.
 
Back
Top Bottom