can anyone tell me a bit of history on this Mauser?

czscotia

Regular
Rating - 100%
42   0   0
Location
Grand Prairie
Hi all,
I'd love to hear any history on this gun, the stampings, year, value anything.More pic added further along
Thanks
SDC12185.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12184.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12186.jpg
[/IMG]
 
Last edited:
It's a German K98k Mauser Obendorf manufactured in 1941. The little eagles on the side of the receiver are proof marks known as waffenampts. In my honest opinion it looks to be re-blued and perhaps have had a bit of touch up work done to the stock. Also, it looks like that sling is probably a repro. Beyond that, it's difficult to give you more info because you've kind of provided us with limited pictures :p
 
thanks for the replies,
All numbers match and I'll post more pictures tomorrow, what parts are important?

Post any part with a number -complete bolt, bands, stock, butt plate, trigger guard, etc...

That way you can tell if it is original or renumbered and postwar rework.
 
uhh i don't about the reblueing but maybe polished a little too much. the stock seems normal nothing done to it. i can see the markings on the buttstock so all good. the sling looks too new more pictures would be nice.
 
I question this rifles authenticity. And heres why even from the limited pics.

First wheres the letter block? Maybe after the serial but should be visible below. If is early enough to be no letter block, it should be a flat butt stock.
2nd. the bluing is too polished. Even a high polish PORT rifle isnt that bright on the barrel.
3rd is the 41. Look at any other byf41. The 41 font is totally different. The front edge of the 4 should be straight not bowed. And in 40 they wrote 1940 on the receiver so its not an earlier version. Also poor alignment of the 4 and 1, not to say that cant happen but in 41 the rifles werent that sloppy yet.
4th the serial font just doesnt look like 41 MauserObendorf to me. Look at other known examples and most of the stuff doesnt look right.

Now I could be totally wrong, there are just my opinions.

I will say that it is a wicked nice looking shooter.
 
I have a bring back BYF 44 that is as bright at that rifle. I've had it since 1969 and I know that the fellow I bought it from for $20 didn't refinish it.

Mine has the same issue I can see on the OPs rifle and that's the Russian Capture, refinished extractor with the reddish hue.

Mine is that way because the original extractor broke and needed to be replaced. I have an un numbered extractor that has the same Nitre Blue the German's used to darken their steel to replace it with but just haven't gotten around to it.

The finishes on some of the Kar98 rifles was as good as and in many cases better than a lot of sporting rifles.

Let me give you some shining examples, 1908 Brazilian contract and the 1929 Persian contract rifles.

If you look at the stamps on the rifle, none of them have been rounded from polishing. All of the stamps are sharp and clear.

I can't see the serial numbers on the bolt or the trigger guard so I can't tell if it's a rework.

By the way, I also have a Russian Capture that has a finish that would rival the finish on that rifle. The Russians didn't bother to reblue barrels actions that didn't require it.

Again, the only issue I can see on that rifle, is the extractor. That isn't a big deal either.

another thing, those stocks got pretty smooth from being carried a lot. Dust, dirt, and other grit being rubbed into the finish while it was being carried with both gloved and bare hands, make a very fine sand paper. Add the grime and oils from hands and other things, and the stock gets exactly the patina you see in the pics.

I've personally, handled thousands of such rifles that were piled 150 rifles to a pallet, stacked across each other and steel banded to stop them form moving around with finishes as good or better than that rifle.

In the late sixties, I saw hundreds of K98s still being issued and again in the mid seventies.

The ones that were taken care of by the soldiers/police that carried them, had stocks that were very smooth from constant use and were being regularly oiled, which gave them a darker patina.

OP, that rifle does look to be a Russian Capture or maybe some other Soviet sattelite capture. Not only the Russians refurbed them after the war. To my knowledge, only the Russians managed to get the iron on some parts to turn that reddish hue.

Either the extractor was replaced because the original broke (not uncommon) or the piece is one of the nicer Russian captures.
 
The first run of the BYF rifles run serial numbers 4514 to 6474hh, so its possible this is a very early BYF rifle, they switched from the S/42 markings in 41
 
here are some more pics, couldnt get too good a shot of the bore but the rifling is well defined. in one pic youll see what looks like a covered serial #??
SDC12208.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12214.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12203.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12204.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12205.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12207.jpg
[/IMG]
SDC12201.jpg
[/IMG]
 
oops pic of the covered serial didnt come out good. Its just above the small stamping on the receiver in one pic here. Also the stock has a different number than the metal parts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom