Can prego's shoot

Can pregos shoot ??

In the early stages of pregnancy why not ??

As for "Can prego's shoot", the sentence structure is incomplete so I can't help you..

See, the use of the " 's " indicates the possessive, so unless you add a noun in there the sentence won't make sense. A proper sentence structure would be "Can prego's (boyfriend, father, mother, etc.) shoot". Then my answer would depend on that noun.

I hope this short grammar course helped you out. LOL

P.S. Not harping on you, just helping everyone out on this forum. I've been a translator/proofreader for 25 years and I see tons of people lately not using the "apostrophe s" properly so I decided to help out.
 
condomboy said:
when it comes to my childrens lives, I guess I'm more of a poppa bear protecting my young.
Click to expand...
Poppa bear don't protect their youngs. They inseminate the female, and get on their way. Hell, they do even kill cubs (as do several mammals species)... How would they know if they are, or not the father of the cubs if the female gets inseminated by several male...

Fortunately, humans have invented marriage, monogamy, and love, which give "some" reassurance.
 
Last edited:
lalunette said:
P.S. Not harping on you, just helping everyone out on this forum. I've been a translator/proofreader for 25 years and I see tons of people lately not using the "apostrophe s" properly so I decided to help out.
Click to expand...

I used to proofread for a company and understand what you're saying, but this is the internet, what is used on here isn't English, it's a variation brought about by 'MURICA :)
 
MattRidge said:
Poppa bear don't protect their youngs. They inseminate the female, and get on their way. Hell, they do even kill cubs (as do several mammals species)... How would they know if they are, or not the father of the cubs if the female gets inseminated by several male...

Fortunately, humans have invented marriage, monogamy, and love, which give "some" reassurance.
Click to expand...

....for someone so protected... you never got read Little Red Riding Hood?
 
condomboy said:
....for someone so protected... you never got read Little Red Riding Hood?
Click to expand...
Charles Perrault or Grimms' version ?

If you are referring to the dangers of "not obeying the mother" (ie. authority)...

kdu77.jpg


Sometime you win, sometime you lose. That's what is actually the essence of life. Not shielding ourselves from all possible kind of danger and *not* actually living.
 
As a guy with a wife who's 7 months along, that baby can clearly hear our voices at normal speaking levels. I wouldn't risk taking her out shooting right now, just my opinion....
 
MattRidge said:
Sometime you win, sometime you lose. That's what is actually the essence of life. Not shielding ourselves from all possible kind of danger and *not* actually living.
Click to expand...

You do see my screen name? I don't just go without "shielding" from possible dangers.

I do take chances for me. If someone else understands what they are doing and they're making the decision for them and it doesn't impact me, have at it. but making the decision for someone who doesn't know they're possibly being put at risk by the actions of another... that to me is wrong with the values I was brought up with in a safe and protected home.
 
condomboy said:
but making the decision for someone who doesn't know they're possibly being put at risk by the actions of another... that to me is wrong with the values I was brought up with in a safe and protected home.
Click to expand...
AFAIK, as per Canadian law, there is no "someone" until out of the womb.
 
MattRidge said:
Sometime you win, sometime you lose. That's what is actually the essence of life. Not shielding ourselves from all possible kind of danger and *not* actually living.
Click to expand...

Are you confusing letting your children make decisions and choices for themselves with giving them involuntary hearing damage in utero? There is a significant difference....
If you're suggesting people should just risk shooting while pregnant and to hell with any possible consequences, well what I think of that is probably better left unsaid...
 
condomboy said:
I used to proofread for a company and understand what you're saying, but this is the internet, what is used on here isn't English, it's a variation brought about by 'MURICA :)
Click to expand...

Thx for your input, I had a good chuckle.

I guess I'll keep "fighting the good fight" and hope to make a difference.

Cheers !!
 
my newest daughter was born 6 weeks ago. her hearing was checked friday, came back PERFECT.

wifey was at the range all pregnancy. indo and out.
 
Only ever seen one pregnant lady at the range. Once we started firing a Vz-58 and a Swiss Arms CQB it was too loud for her and her hubby. They gave us some dirty looks like we were doing something wrong and they left. I guess they thought the range would be a nice and quiet place to hang out on a Sunday.
 
Expendable Nate said:
Now I know this isn't the right spot and that there is a ladies section on here but my wife won't join and she only shoots pistol.

We have both done research on the possible damage that could be done to a unborn infants hearing. Most articles have said it's ok but some say other wise. What do you think? I know it depends on the stage of development aNd for the sake of this thread we are talking third trimester so his ears are near fully developed. Is there a risk?
Click to expand...
Wrap her up in foam and duct tape that should keep Jr.s ears safe .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom