The fact that the Criminal Code can be quite an interesting read, it is incumbent upon the Crown to prove each detail of an offence beyond a reasonable doubt. BUT WHEN the law is written with so many facets built in, a multitude of cross definitions, and complexities purposely installed to mitigate any chance something falls outside of the definition, you MUST READ the regulations that define what's what in the Firearms Act. As an example:
Under section 84(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada in company with the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and Other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles, the statute clearly defines: The components and parts of weapons, the accessories and the cartridge magazines listed in Part 4 of the schedule are prohibited devices for the purposes of paragraphs (a) and (d) of the definition prohibited device in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code.
In short, if you think it might be against the law, it probably is. And with Trudeau and Blair, they have every intention of pulling the loop tighter and tighter on lawful firearm ownership in Canada. IMHO.
