Canada's WWII-era pistols dangerously unreliable - News Article 10/12/ '18

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brookwood

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Location
Saskatoon
Canada's WWII-era pistols dangerously unreliable — but the quest to find a replacement drags on

The British Army had this exact same problem in 2011. They fixed it for a fraction of the cost in only two years

Tristin Hopper
Updated: December 10, 2018

The Canadian Army brought 20 pistols to an Arkansas shooting competition. Before events had even officially kicked off, 15 of those pistols had jammed so badly during the warmup they couldn’t be used.

“It was so bad, the guys coming off (the range) were handing over their (remaining five) pistols to the next team because they couldn’t trust the others,” said Ken Pole, who wrote about the incident for a feature in Canadian Army Today.

On average, Pole found that the Canadians’ handguns has jammed once every 62 shots. Their British competitors, by contrast, squeezed off 5,620 rounds without a hitch.

This is all pretty standard for the Browning Hi-Power, the 74-year-old pistol still carried as the primary sidearm of the Canadian Armed Forces.

Unlike most pistols carried by G7 militaries, Brownings have a tendency to rattle and soldiers have been advised not to fully load the pistol because it will wear out the springs.

When a Canadian soldier is deployed to a war zone such as Afghanistan or Mali, they’re issued with whatever Browning Hi-Power is deemed to be least likely to give out. That’s why some have joked that if they’re ever forced to use their sidearm in combat, they’d be better off throwing it than shooting it.

“If you give me a choice of a sharp stick or a Browning, I’ll … sadly take the Browning but will look fondly at the stick,” Bob Kinch, a former competitive marksman with the Canadian Armed Forces, wrote in a September Quora post.

Like many times when the Canadian military tries to buy something, however, the quest to replace the Browning is now held up in a years-long procurement limbo. A 2016 statement by the Department of National Defence estimated that soldiers wouldn’t be able to get their hands on new pistols until at least 2026.

Canada’s Hi-Powers are so desperately obsolete, however, that the army has been forced to greenlight a stopgap program to buy up some working pistols in the meantime. Known as the “Army Interim Pistol Program,” it will buy about 7,000 sidearms to immediate plug what the army is calling its “current pistol capability gaps.”

“Due to the Browning 9mm advancing age, replacement of these pistols will be necessary in the future,” the Department of National Defence told the National Post in a statement.

When Canadians were still shooting Nazis and North Koreans, the Browning was a fine weapon. Designed in the 1920s, it ranked among the most reliable sidearms that a mid-century soldier could expect to carry into battle. It was one of the few weapons to carry the dubious distinction of being used by both sides. After German troops overran a French factory making Hi-Powers in 1940, they ordered the facility to continue cranking out the pistols for use by Axis forces.

Canada’s Hi-Powers were all manufactured in Toronto by John Inglis and Company, which would later become a maker of washing machines. Many of the Inglis Hi-Powers were actually intended to be sent to China for use against Japanese forces.The order fell through when Imperial Japan surrendered and Canada was suddenly left with a massive surplus of wartime 9mm pistols. As late as the early 2000s, there were unused Hi-Powers sitting in Canadian depots, still covered in factory grease.

Age has withered Canada’s stock of Hi-Powers and in the wake of 70 years of pistol development, the sidearms have also become wildly obsolete.

Hi-Powers have no place to affix a flashlight. They have notoriously small sights that made the pistol hard to aim in low light. They’re virtually impossible to fire for anybody who’s wearing gloves or left-handed. They also have an unusually long hammer which has a tendency to shred shooters’ hands. “If I fired more than 20 shots, the hammer bite would cut my hand open,” the marksman Kinch wrote.

“The bottom line is that we don’t have a sufficiently reliable General Service Pistol,” Major Carl Gendron, head of infantry weapon procurement, told Canadian Army Today.

Like many artifacts from the 1940s, the Hi-Power’s all-metal construction also makes it unusually heavy. The average Canadian police officer, for instance, is carrying a Glock, a pistol made significantly lighter due to its polymer frame.

In a 2017 story on the 10-year, $50 million process to replace Canada’s Hi-Powers, Postmedia reporter David Pugliese wrote that “industry representatives have privately questioned why Canada would take so long to buy a new pistol, noting that the process could be completed in about a year or two at most.”

The British Army would seem to agree. Just a few years ago, the Brits were in the exact same position as Canada: Their soldiers were still carrying Second World War-era Brownings and this was starting to become a dangerous liability for deployed troops.

So, London tested some alternatives, settled on the Glock 17 and bought 25,000 of them for the equivalent of $15 million CDN — about one quarter the expected cost of Canada’s program for pistol replacement.

According to the BBC, the whole process only took two years.




https://thestarphoenix.com/news/canada/canadas-wwii-era-pistols-dangerously-unreliable-but-the-quest-to-find-a-replacement-drags-on/wcm/372d2ac8-01dc-4348-9634-dae0df91d2d5
 
I mastered the "Bang Bang, push round into chamber with finger, Bang Bang, push round into chamber with finger" drill nicely when they paid me to shoot BHPs, haven't fired once since.

They also have an unusually long hammer which has a tendency to shred shooters’ hands.

I think you are doing it wrong, to be fair :).
 
This story doesn't make sense. The problem with the Brownings is not the handgun, but the 1944-era "JI" marked magazines. The welds fail on the top corners where the back meets the feed lips. In the mid-00s as AFG was cooking off, the Army bought Italian or Belgian made commercial magazines. Absolutely no issues with the replacements. The range use magazines have had countless numbers of rounds fired and it is no wonder they are breaking down.

As for the team that went away, I wonder if the problem was that tiresome phrase in the manual 'lightly oiled'. In my experience with both civilian and military Brownings, they run better when wetter. Build up a film of carbon on the surfaces and they don't jam.
 
After 12 years of service during which I owned a commercial HP and shot any number of Inglis models, I can vouch for magazines being the cause of the feeding problems and poor trigger pulls. The trigger shoe engages the front of the mag body and if it drags, you get a lousy pull. We looked for mags with a smooth surface at the contact point and if necessary, polished them.

I was given a die by an armourer that supposedly reshaped the mag lips, but it was a short term fix. Commercial mags with a high gloss finish were much better. On my commercial model, I removed the mag safety which greatly improves the trigger pull. Can't do that on a military model and not get your pee-pee slapped.

I shot a pair of commercial HPs in IPSC for years, making "A" class against the .45s. Accuracy was as good as I could hold. I never had to replace a recoil spring although it might have been a good idea once in a while. The frame was not showing evidence of being battered. I kept them well lubed, but not 'wet'. That attracts dirt and retains grit. It would have been very bad in the sand box, but the guns would not have warped with the heat.

As for the HP being too heavy, ah shucks. Do some weight training. It's a combat weapon, not an item of dress.
 
After 12 years of service during which I owned a commercial HP and shot any number of Inglis models, I can vouch for magazines being the cause of the feeding problems and poor trigger pulls. The trigger shoe engages the front of the mag body and if it drags, you get a lousy pull. We looked for mags with a smooth surface at the contact point and if necessary, polished them.

I was given a die by an armourer that supposedly reshaped the mag lips, but it was a short term fix. Commercial mags with a high gloss finish were much better. On my commercial model, I removed the mag safety which greatly improves the trigger pull. Can't do that on a military model and not get your pee-pee slapped.

I shot a pair of commercial HPs in IPSC for years, making "A" class against the .45s. Accuracy was as good as I could hold. I never had to replace a recoil spring although it might have been a good idea once in a while. The frame was not showing evidence of being battered. I kept them well lubed, but not 'wet'. That attracts dirt and retains grit. It would have been very bad in the sand box, but the guns would not have warped with the heat.

As for the HP being too heavy, ah shucks. Do some weight training. It's a combat weapon, not an item of dress.

Completely agree - its a very good pistol and the fact is whatever they try to replace it with will draw criticism of some type at some point! However if a replacement is inevitable they should do as the Brits did and get a quantity discount on 100 pallets of Glock 17’s .... save the trials BS and associated costs and use the money to buy more magazines and ammunition for training
 
Completely agree - its a very good pistol and the fact is whatever they try to replace it with will draw criticism of some type at some point! However if a replacement is inevitable they should do as the Brits did and get a quantity discount on 100 pallets of Glock 17’s .... save the trials BS and associated costs and use the money to buy more magazines and ammunition for training

They could use the money saved.
I just heard yesterday that the govt cut the ammo budget this year by half.
I guess our troops don't really need to know how to shoot.
 
Wanna bet that the plastic Sig pistol recently adopted by the US to replace the Beretta will be out of inventory in a decade?
 
Wanna bet that the plastic Sig pistol recently adopted by the US to replace the Beretta will be out of inventory in a decade?

Just in time to bring back the Colt M1911A1.:eek:

Mags are an inherent problem for any auto. They do wear out, as do the pistols themselves.

In the late '70s I saw Finnish troops still armed with Lugers and Austrian troops carrying wartime P38s. The Browning seemed quite at home.
 
They could use the money saved.
I just heard yesterday that the govt cut the ammo budget this year by half.
I guess our troops don't really need to know how to shoot.
this is unfortunately not new....and is a constant and recurring theme in the military. IMO I believe that part of the problem is the outrageous prices they pay for ammunition that will be used for training purposes. The second problem is the lack of emphasis on good coaching so that they can maximize the training value from the resources expended.
 
I suspect that the delay in selecting a new firearm is in how to make sure that a company in Quebec gets the contract.

Maybe the LIEberals will give it to their favourite charity, Bombardier.

Imagine the amounts of money that Bombardier could suck off the government for things like construction costs, engineering, tooling, etc..
 
I suspect that the delay in selecting a new firearm is in how to make sure that a company in Quebec gets the contract.

Maybe the LIEberals will give it to their favourite charity, Bombardier.

Imagine the amounts of money that Bombardier could suck off the government for things like construction costs, engineering, tooling, etc..

Dont forget that other ‘love child’ in la belle province ... SNC-LAVALIN recently awarded a huge transportation project by none other than Michael Sabia who now runs the Quebec Pension Plan — boy does Quebec ever know how to keep the ‘good old boys’ well employed and restricting the trough to the select few!
 
Failures have been observed with new mags and old.

As for the weight complaint it's cute to talk that talk behind the keyboard...
 
Failures have been observed with new mags and old.

As for the weight complaint it's cute to talk that talk behind the keyboard...

The weight is a bonus when you have to throw the pistol at the hostile when out of ammo :)

I wouldn't mind if the CAF adopted the same p320 as the danish as a replacement.... make it dark green, put a canada leaf instead of the "SIG" logo in the grip, or whatever.

ny_pistol_med_logo-660x429.jpg
 
The weight is a bonus when you have to throw the pistol at the hostile when out of ammo :)

I wouldn't mind if the CAF adopted the same p320 as the danish as a replacement.... make it dark green, put a canada leaf instead of the "SIG" logo in the grip, or whatever.

ny_pistol_med_logo-660x429.jpg

Oh it's an excellent club or throwing implement along with a half decent beer bottle opener.

I guess that sig wouldn't be a bad choice. A glock or Hk would be my preferred option but time will tell what is chosen.
 
As far as the 'boo hoo it's heavy, do some weight training'coment goes, the Hi Power is a secondary weapon. It should be light and reliable, and ideally with a high capacity, all things sorely lacking in a Browning.

I would honestly go with a Glock 17 over a 226 or 225, the other pistols already in the system for Canada.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom