I can think of one or two other religious group who took the same line in Canada in WWII. Happy to enjoy the benefits of freedom, but not so happy to risk life and limp preserving same.
Freedom? In Canada they were put in work camps. I'll also mention that their counter parts in Germany were arrested by the thousands for refusing compulsory military service in Hitler's army. Many were killed by the Nazis; some beheaded, others froze to death while being made to stand in the freezing cold with water poured over them. So tread very carefully when you insinuate that they were objecting because they didn't want to put their lives on the line. The fact is, if everyone made such a galant stand, there wouldn't have been a war at all. Yes, that is an idealistic notion, I realize. My point simply being that conscientious objectors were not avoiding risk to life and limb.
There is also another way to look at the matter. You may be believe that soldiers died, sacrificing their lives, to preserve freedoms such as the freedom to choose your beliefs. What does it say if you then step in and take away that freedom they fought for?
Last edited:





























...Plinker out!























