Yeah that manual really helped, getting the electrical system worked out saved the gun mechs (and the taxpayers) a fortune in Compressed Nitrogen that we were using to air start the T 72. It was robust and reliable and I would have really liked to try out the gunnery system and compare apples to apples on target engagement. I have seen first hand the penetration capability of the gun while performing armour testing in Israel, very impressive. But unfortunately this was a fixed gun, no chance to experience the turret in live fire conditions. The ballistic design of the T 72 hull and turret are first rate, metallurgy on the hull and turret show good quality materials used throughout the manufacture but to very wide tolerances. Lots of contaminated welds, gaps filled in with weld and other shortcuts but generally a very well designed and made tank. My discussions with testers in Israel led me to believe that the gunnery system was no better than a Cougar and the stabilization was so poor that engaging while on the move was limited to "Battle" ranges and really had to be done from short halts. Problems with gun/sight misalignment after an ejection cycle was also a significant problem, for those unaware after the round is fired the gun elevates to a position that allows the auto loader to expel the spent casing through a door at the rear of the turret and then reload projectile and casing from under turret storage into the breech. The gun then attempts to realign itself with the gunners sight to allow firing to continue, often the alignment would be off and accuracy would go out the window.
True I have already mentioned that and it was one of the warnings I had read from the US Army Foreign System Test Group. The way to negate the start up surge (and no it does not drive off on its own) was upon shut down follow the checklist do what was called a oil double suction of the gearbox and reduction gears which I had and still have taped to my T72 manual inside cover (should I ever buy a T72 I guess). When done it made for easier start ups and took away the surge forward.Great thread You should also post it in Army.ca
Reading a blog from a British Surplus seller, they would always tie off the T-72 to another tank as it had a habit of creeping forward when started cold.
Damage caused to the T72 by the various trial rounds, not allowed to take pictures and even the manufactures where not allowed to see their competitors strikes/damage. They could look at and take pics of there own but not each others. To be honest the 105mm ammo jazzed up to hit like a 120mm was a dead dog in my books. The target tank had all the "soft" parts cut off like search lights/grenade launchers/hand rails, essentially anything that would contaminate a clear hit on either turret or hull armour. The thought was the rounds would go sailing clean through, but the first round was a sobering wake up that maybe the Czechs/Russians knew a thing or to about building tanks and casting armour. The first round struck just to the left (as your looking at the tank) of the main gun, and just got absorbed by the turret armour. We popped the turret hatch open expecting to see a penetration and all the damn thing did was form a slight plate sized bulge in the armour and cast some paint flakes around of the turret wall. The test rounds faired "slightly" better on the hull front armour (this being a M1 Standard production tank it had a 20mm plate welded to the glacis plate and with the glacis being so sharp it did a good job at defeating the 105/120 rounds)but still even half failed to go through. One got in and started a small fire inside so yours truly went inside the burning tank to deal with that. Talking about fires the fire bottles on the T72 came filled with Freon gas and that's a big no in N.America reading the book it talked about the explosive squibs used to fire the bottles but no pics of it so rummaging about the "pile of "stuff" I found spares of what I assumed where the squibs just rolling around loose. Health and safety hah, who needs that.
The 125mm gun on the T-72 can use the same ammo as the most modern Soviet tanks (3BM-46/3BM-42M allegedly 600mm at 2km), and modern Abrams and Leopard shouldn't be immune frontally, although it hasn't actually been tried yet.So, how does the T-72 cannon/ammo do when it strikes modern western tank armour? Can it penetrate an Abrams or Leopard most of the time?
...why the liberal government did not drop the coin on the Dutch Leo II is crazy, spend a dollar to save a dime logic.
No, the T&E tanks did not have anything to do with the German gift of Ex-WP tanks and equipment to the Government of Canada and DHist/DND. It was along the same lines as a "gift" from the Germans who where glad to divest themselves of the unwanted vehicles but had not tie in to what DHist at DND went and got. Matter of fact I seem to recall something about that museum load being written up in the old Sentinal. In a subsequent batch of vehicles four BMP2 came to Canada for trials (read destructive testing).
Another bit of misinformation is someone was mentioning the tank needing a hammer to shift, No the tank had gate shifting seven forward, one reverse and sailed along at 60KPH (I do believe we went faster on occasion). Very cool to see at speed on snowy ground with brick sized chunks of packed snow and ice fly off the tracks. The only time I could ever see a hammer in the drivers position would be to smack the four dogs holding the escape hatch closed to exit the tank out the bottom. Shifting was never an issue on a T72.
Being a straight forward and rather simple vehicle to keep in the field, it can even be called "agricultural" in nature it was amazingly robust. I had to retrieve the T72 that the Gagetown museum had been given by T&E for one of their trials and deploy with it for a trial. The tank had sat, unloved and unattended to for a year filling up with rain. In one hour I had the tank running again which sort of blew my mind. I very much doubt any Leopard of the day would have started up like that T72 did.
^009 coming back to life
One of the rewarding things of being in the field with the T72 was the amazing degree of latitude we where given as the things where just so weird to see driving and being used as an enemy force till T&E needed to shoot something at them (like the Leopard Mid Life Extension)120mm to 105mm, ADATS, TOW2B, etc. C Sqn RCD took great pleasure in seeing them and it was not uncommon to be tracked by Leopards WAY, WAY out of any conceivable arc. Tank gunners did love tracking us to say the least. The thing was everyone said that the 125mm muzzle end was very visible even at 2,000 M and it was sobering to think if they where looking down the pipe then the T72 gun was also looking back at them and if you ever see the 125mm AP round or HEAT round I have great confidence it would have ripped through the Leo C1
^ Awaiting the order to advance across the inner German border at the Fulda Gap or the Hof Corridor with thousands of other Warsaw Pact tanks and APCs and make the race to the English Channel sweeping NATO aside along the way...............that or head back to the hanger after a day buzzing around the training area.