Cartridge/Bullet Options for LR shooting

Mystic Precision

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 99.9%
1082   1   1
Location
Summerland, BC
I have seen alot of the same question being asked from those wanting to get started in LR shooting, F class mostly. Thought I would put down some options that is working in most LR disciplines. Since bullets are what is driving advancements, we have to start there.

With F class being the fastest growing form of LR shooting, I will focus on this. Most other LR shooting like BR will also use the same/similar choices depending on overall weight allowed.

At this time, bullets are coming to the 'end' of useable weights. Apparently, when bullets need a twist faster then 1 in 7, you hit a wall. If someone figures out how to build a bullet differently, we may be able to make bullets more streamlined.

The main choices are 6mm, 6.5mm, 7mm. The 30 and 338 are very specialized cals used only in unlimited weight or muzzle braked classes. Recoil is simply too high in 'light' weight classes.

The 308 and 223 are usually limited by the rules of their respective sports. These would certainly NOT be used when other cals are allowed. Shooting either in F-Open would be a severe handicapp if shooting beyond 300m.

6mm:

Bullets: 105/107gr for moderate ranges like 600m or out to 1k in calmer conditions. The 115gr is better suited to 1k type events.
Cartridges: 6BR is the smallest and does an excellent job with the 105/107 family of bullets. The larger XC, Lapua, and now 243 and variants work much better with the 115gr.
Velocities: Ideally, all will approach 3000fps muzzle velocity. There are some pushing the 115gr to 3200fps and this improves wind drift substantially.
Barrel length: 30" is a nice compromise but size will be determined by class overall weight.

Wind rating: Of the three cals, the 6mm has the lowest BC bullets so for a similar velocity, drifts more. Running elevated velocity helps but then there are issues with the bullets themselves.

6.5mm:

Bullets: 139gr/142gr bullets are the best for out to 1k shooting. For 600m and in, there is strong interest in 123gr class bullets. All can easily be pushed to 3000fps with the lighter ones approaching 3300fps. The common twist of 8/8.5 indicates that there is room to build longer bullets. So far, no one has come up with a higher BC design. Math would suggest that a 150ish VLD bullet with BC over 0.65 is possible.

Cartridge: Most common is the 6.5-284. Works but I consider the case volume a bit big. Most rifles push the 140 class of bullets around 2900 to 3000fps. The 284 case is larger then it needs to be. However, if someone wants to go 3100+fps, then a great one. If there is a 150ish VLD bullet, then the 284 will become ideal.

260, 260AI/6.5 Mystic, 6.5X55/AI I consider to be better choices. The larger cases will match the common 6.5-284 velocity, use 10% to 15% less powder too.

Velcocity: 139 to 142gr bullets don't seem to like going much over 3000fps. Most are running 2900 to 2950fps with some even going slower. The lighter bullets don't seem to mind going over 3000fps.

Barrel length: 30" is a great length for this cal.

Wind drift: Pretty much the ideal combo of wind drift vs recoil. Wind drift is measurably less then the 6mm at reg. speeds.

For a non cal specific shooting class, this is the cal to beat!

7mm:

Bullets: You get very high BC bullets in this cal. The 162gr Amax lists at 0.625 and certainly flies like that. The Bergers push the limits with their 180gr at 0.675 or so. Very few bullets can match this type of BC. In general, the Sierra MK are low BC for their bullet weight. Not alot of choices yet but that is changing quickly.

Cartridge: There are some playing with the 284 at very high pressures. Sometimes they work, sometimes, not so good. Larger cases like the 280AI/7 Mystic, RSAUM and WSM are ideal for the 162 to 180gr class of bullets.

Velocity: Most will try for at least 2900fps. With the large magnum cases, 3000fps with the 180gr Bergers is possible. These bullets do not like going faster and there is definitely no need to do so.

Barrel length: 30" for sure.

Wind drift: By far, this offers the lowest wind drift of the three. In fact, the wind drift of the 180gr Berger equals or better some of the really heavy 30 and 338 offerings. There have been reports of bullet blow up but QC seems to be improving.

Recoil: There is always a trade off and the recoil of this cal is it. With the 162 to 180gr bullets, recoil is harsh even in a 10KG rifle. A few shots in a hunting application is no problem but trying to shoot 60rds in a day ACCURATELY will be taxing to many.

Cost: Bigger is definitely more expensive per bang. Also, component availability in Canada can be problematic.

This is a cal that will see the most development over the next 6 months. It offers real world ballistic advantages but I don't see this taking a huge bite from the other cals as shooter fatigue is a real problem and must be considered.

So will barrel heat and wear.

The 7mm will really start to show its importance in heavy gun 1000yd/m class or sports that allow muzzle brakes. For F class, the interest is growing at events out to 1000yds/m where high winds are expected. Some believe the reduced wind drift is worth the beating.

For LR shooting, the number of possible choices is shrinking as we fully development how bullets work at distance. There are really two bullet weight class for each cal and the only real choice is the combustion chamber chosen to launch them.

Unless new bullets come out soon, by the end of 2007, there will be two best choices for 600m and shorter, and three choices for beyond.

As far as accuracy, they are all equally accurate. The trade off will be ballistics (wind drift) vs recoil (weight of class/muzzle brakes) vs heat/wear/costs.

Hope this helps...

Jerry
 
Last edited:
Thanks guys. If only reading the conditions was this straightforward...big sigh.

Anyone hear if the 115gr 6mm have migrated up north yet?

jeepingpw, next time you are heading through, give a call and we can grab a coffee or better yet, go burn some powder.

how was your shooting season in Vernon?

Jerry
 
mysticplayer said:
Thanks guys. If only reading the conditions was this straightforward...big sigh.

Anyone hear if the 115gr 6mm have migrated up north yet?

jeepingpw, next time you are heading through, give a call and we can grab a coffee or better yet, go burn some powder.

how was your shooting season in Vernon?

Jerry

a few guys got some up here... I've got some moly'd tubb 115s but I don't like moly so they're gonna just gonna sit until I can decide if that particular barrel is going to be a moly'd job or not... getting that stuff out later is a ##### if your not seeing any promise... so once you start shooting them you might as well dedicate the barrel to it... least that's the way I feel about it.... mileage varies for other folks I'm sure.

I found moly'd changed my POA and it was never consistent so I went back to bare bullets. Now some folks get it working great, right Maynard? He probably can't remember the last time he cleaned the sucker either... that's just the way it goes for some guys and rig combinations.

I'm dying to try them from all the conversations I hear about how good they group against the 6.5 bullets... ya run the numbers ballistically and they look good. I just wish I had some bare ones to try first... I have a rig for them 6/250 1:8 30" barrel that should work for the tests.

the moly might factor into the equation a tickle in that it'll reduce pressure... just might be the ticket to shoot them as such...

I just never seem to have enough time to #### with all the testing we like to do before bringing it on line... especially if you'e got something that's already working well... a change for the sake of change can have you running around in circles sorting it out... meanwhile you're dropping points that are very hard to make back...

you get your hands on some I'd been interested in your results Jerry... moly'd or bare...
 
Last edited:
I have shot alot of molied bullets and never had a problem with them. There isn't that much of a benefit in a match smooth barrel. Really a good thing in a 'rougher' production grade barrel or when you want to shoot ALOT between cleanings.

Certainly not some magic potion where you get super duper velocities with no pressure. What happens is you get what the cartridge should do on a more consistent basis in 'rough' bores. Never found moly to make a rifle shoot more accurately, just more stable over a lot of shots.

I am presently cleaning my Mystics around 50 to 100rds so that's not too bad. I am shooting naked Lapua's. Not going to use moly on these because the load density is so high, I can't put in more powder needed to shoot moly. I also don't want to run H4350 due to increased throat erosion (didn't shoot in #1 anyways).

I don't think I will be shooting the 6mm for at least one season. I now have two 6.5 Mystics so will be in the 6.5 cal for the foreseable future.

As to twist, some are reporting that an 8 twist is too slow. 7.5 or 7 seems to be the twist to use but then every barrel is different.

Run at similar velocities to the 6.5, the 115gr 6mm will still drift more. Not much but it could matter in gusty conditions. Where the 115gr has an advantage is if run well above 3000fps. Now there is a tangible benefit without blowing out your shoulder. The danger is always to make these VLD bullets work at elevated velocities. Only worthwhile if you compete beyond 600m alot.

The 243 and improved wildcats seem to be doing this quite easily. The 22/250 family of cases is simply too small.

I am sure the bullets will shoot well if a good match to the barrel.

Jerry
 
Jerry wrote "I am shooting naked Lapua's. Not going to use moly on these because the load density is so high, I can't put in more powder needed to shoot moly."

Good point about moly and load density, I just worked up a load for my 7/270WSM. I can just fit enough powder (H1000) in the case (perfect situation really), so I won't switch to moly just to lose some velocity.

BTW do you have an engineering cert? (just kidding)
 
Jerry funny you should mention H4350... because I've been thinking of trying it with one of my 6.5's... I shot some chrony'd tests late summer and surprising enough the ES & SD was pretty stable single digit stuff... surpised the heck out of me because looking down in the case the powder doesn't come anywhere near the shoulder...

I just heard the stuff was barrel burner quality... I'm not sure about it's flame rate either... it's up there but that's all I know... I heard a story that the AMU stopped using it because they suddenly starting replacing a lotta barrels for their crew... dunno... might just be a story without substance...

again if it shoots and groups barrel life is down on my list... might try testing it some more come spring...

50-100 sounds good gets you through a days shooting... maybe two... I had one match where I was going to clean end of day... was too tired and didn't bother and it shot great the second and even the third day... yes Maynard I did listent to you guys that time... and did as I was told...

now if Pastor is reading this well he'd say great!... Please please... keeping doing that anything to make his trips up here easier and more rewarding... as if they weren't already!

for some it does work... and even if it don't and they "think" it does... that'll be enough for some to shoot better overall... weird juju...

moly also might have something for the XTC and 3P crowd...don't shoot that game so don't have perspective on it

been following your mystic... seems like a good one! Keep at 'er.
 
Last edited:
The 6.5 Mystic has been a very rewarding project. Been playing with #2 (#3 actually but that is for another story). A few changes to the barrel and will be using a new block made by a CGN member.

Still using a Gaillard barrel with the same specs, smithed by Dennis Sorenson, more or less identical chamber to the #1. I have been shooting this in the the orig barrel block (shimmed to fit). Working on a good load but so far 1/4MOA at 200yds is consistent. I am hoping for better but I don't think this pipe will do it. But there is still more to tweak....

At this point, the rifle confirms my thoughts for a match quality F class rifle using a Stevens/Savage action. It works...

You need MOA to shoot possibles and 1/2 MOA to shoot a perfect score. Both rifles have shown that they have the mechanical accuracy to shoot perfect scores. Not bad for an untuned off the shelf dirt cheap action. Also, a sign of an excellent barrel and load components. Not to mention smithing.

The cartridge is also a nice blend of velocity, accuracy and recoil. As others,using similar wildcats have found, this is a great alternative to the 6.5-284. With H4831SC, throat life is very good so far (20thou after 900rds in #1). At this rate, it could go 4000rds before growing too long (highly unlikely but will find out).

Will have a full write up once I get the new block fitted and confirm my loads. Stay tuned.

Jerry
 
Last edited:
The cartridge is also a nice blend of velocity, accuracy and recoil. As others,using similar wildcats have found, this is a great alternative to the 6.5-284. With H4831SC, throat life is very good so far (20thou after 900rds in #1). At this rate, it could go 4000rds before growing too long (highly unlikely but will find out).
Jerry,
This paragraph piqued my interest. You are inferring that this barrel will be shot out (competitively) at 4K rounds which translates into about 90 thou growth. Do you use a Stony Point guage? The reason I find this very interesting is that I shoot a Gaillard barrel (6.5x284), and it's throat has only grown 20 thou in 844 shots. I switched to H4831 powder because H4350 caused double the throat erosion. This rifle shoots pretty good right now (jkajfes knows), but your numbers tell me that it will go way beyond the regular 1200 round count for 6.5x284. What do you think?

Terry Perkins
 
sure sounds like it Jerry...have found it interesting have since you started posting about it... If you can get 4k heck man if you can get 3k with it. I think it's going to peak the interest a number of guys... so please kept at it... Sound like a nice F-class rig... 1/2 MOA would be nice, more wiggle room in the v-bull. The way the consenus of thinking with the smaller 5.25 V-bull sounds like this rig would really hang in there...

We are finding similar results with the Gaillard tubes here in the east. I've had 3-4 in 6mm and 6.5... haven't had anything that didn't work from him. Terry's done well with one and I know there's a few more guys shooting them. Ted G. is very nice to deal with... first class barrel maker... he pays attention to his work...

I like H4831 also.... have tried RL22 and it works also, just settled on the former as you can't be shooting everything...

found any bullet preference with it? I flip between 139 Lapuas and 142 Sierras... gave the 140 Amaxs a spin... initially they looked promising... then in a medium range match last year in Kingston the worm turned and a couple came apart and I won't touch them again... if I remember correctly this has also happened to Leo D'Armour at some point in the past... talked to Hornady about it... they never took me seriously or they simply don't care... they promised to send me another thousand to replace what I had... they simply don't follow up on promises... guess sales are so good they don't have to worry. I'd never trust them in a match again... one was enough...
 
Terry, that estimation was big time SWAG. I will continue to burn powder down the pipe and see what happens. My guess is that erosion accelerates as the barrel ages. I have read post of 260AI shooters that are getting close to 3000rds of accurate fire. My 6.5 Mystic is very similar case shape with a few tweaks in the throat area.

I have heard theories on alloy contents in steel being more wear resistant and heat during useage 'burning' out certain desired elements. NO idea but am very impressed with what I have seen so far.

Glad that it agrees with your rifle and throat wear. Right now the OAL can go another 125 thou before the bullet would not have enough neck engagement to be of interest. If wear is linear, then the barrel is going to see alot of shooting. Will it retain the same/similar levels of accuracy?????

No way to know but I believe that polishing that first few inches of throat with JB can't hurt. There is going to be alot of fire cracking and that surface must start getting rougher. Tweaking the loads will be necessary and possibly the need for moly to aid in the roughness.

Now that I am testing #2, it will be a very long time to get both barrels to that type of rd count. At least I know, this wildcat is not going to toast a pipe in 700rds.

I will definitely be setting the barrels back. Just not sure when....

My throat checking is very crude. When the barrel was new, I made a few dummy rds and established a working OAL. The bullets were just engraving the lands. Now, I pull out the bullet a ways, move out the seater and reseat the bullet till I again, just engrave the lands. I check the new OAL length.

The difference in OAL is the change in the ogive or relation to the lands. Close enough for this type of work. With a change this small, who cares.

jkajfes, I have really had luck with hornady bullets, Amax and SST over the years in my hunting and LR rifles. I did come across some SST with bent tips and Hornady did replace them. I just had to send them the UPC bar code from each box (with a few sample bullets) and they were in the mail quickly.

The first gen of Amax did have their problems. Hornady was really pushing the VLD concept and extremely high BC (no 6.5 bullet has come close yet). Unfortunately, design didn't match up with manf and bullet problems existed.

I know they reengineered the entire line up and have gone to thicker jackets and in some cases, stubbier designs. I have heard of no bullet blows up since. Playing with the Amax recently, the BC is still higher then published in real world shooting. Their pricing and availability make them well worth testing.

In my 7RMs and 7 Mystic, the 162gr Amax is a superb bullet. From my drops, the BC number is right, just use a G7 drag profile. Compare that to the 'standard' G1 profile and you will fall out of your chair. Flat shooting....

For my first 6.5 Mystic, I tested the 140gr SST and Amax, 142gr MK and 139gr Lapua. It was very obvious that the Lapua was the bullet of choice. Pretty hard to argue with bullets falling into the same hole at 200yds.

All the other bullets shot well, like 1/4 to 1/2 MOA, but bugholes is way more interesting. I have never had to nor seen the need to sort Hornady's. I am really turned off Sierras given the many concerns on QC. I simply don't see the point of paying a premium for a 'match' bullet that you need to cull upwards of 1/3 the bullets. Not to mention all that time needed to sort. May as well shoot sorted bulk hunting bullets.

The biggest problem, the concern that there are internal QC issues as well. If the outside is not consistent, can the insides be any better? That concerns limits my confidence in this product and confidence is everything in shooting at your best.

I have now played with 5, yes FIVE, different lots numbers of the Lapuas. These have been produced over a several years (old stock to just off the boat). In every single instance, I have just loaded and fired right from the box. Same load, same everthing.

POI, accuracy, velocity/drop have been identical from 200yds to 1000m. I have even mixed lots when shooting a group and they have all landed where they should have. Now that is what I call a match bullet. They are also very well priced.

LR ballistics are said to be similar to the MK. Never tried as I have stopped using the MK. The Lapuas are a must test if you shoot a 6.5!!!!

Right now 1/4 MOA is what I am getting in Mystic #2 shooting a near identical load to #1 in a near identical rifle. The consistency of barrel and bullet/load is just amazing. Ted's QC seems to jive with Lapuas. Of course, the good install that Dennis did helps tremendously.

Can't wait to put #2 into its new proper fitting block and see if I can squeeze the accuracy under 1/4 MOA. The block will be made by a CGN member at a very reasonable price and he will make more!

Barrel wear is becoming a real issue. I think experimenting with 'slower' powders is showing some significant gains plus the higher load densities isn't hurting either. For me, I just can't think of a better suited powder for the 6.5 Mystic, or a 260AI, then H4831SC. 100% load density and accuracy with good throat life.

Me a happy boy...

Jerry
 
Last edited:
Jerry,
This will be the first barrel I will shoot until it doesn't. I too, use Lapua (silver) Scenars, and JB every couple of hundred rounds. I also slow fire for 90% of my shooting. This barrel was short throated so I could reach the lands for a long time. I'll let you know how the barrel count went when it becomes uncompetitive.
 
Terry, that would be great info to have. How much H4831SC are you loading in your 6.5-284?

I am using 46.5gr lit by a CCI BR2 in Win cases. naked bullets. I usually use moly but there isn't enough room in the case with this OAL. Bulk powder from Higginson.

Will make a new post on this new rifle shortly just to keep everyone updated on this projects progress.

Jerry
 
Last edited:
Jerry, I'm using 53.5 grains of H4831 regular cut (from Higginsons' also), CCI BR2 primers, 15-20 thou off the lands. No pressure signs, just over 2900 fps. However, it sure prints nice groups.

All my previous 6.5 barrels I had setback at 1000-1100 shots, so I'm very interested to see how it goes. BTW the setback barrels stopped performing competitively anywhere from 500 to 800 shots.

Terry Perkins
 
Terry, my guess is that you can go another 1000 to 1500rds before set back. Try and go back at least 1.5", 2" better yet. Even if you go another 500 to 800rds, you have tripled your barrel useage.

Will be interesting to see how my pipes do given I am burning 15% less powder but still going 2900fps.

Jerry
 
jkajfes said:
I've got some moly'd tubb 115s but I don't like moly so they're gonna just gonna sit until I can decide if that particular barrel is going to be a moly'd job or not... getting that stuff out later is a ##### if your not seeing any promise... so once you start shooting them you might as well dedicate the barrel to it... least that's the way I feel about it.... mileage varies for other folks I'm sure.

I'm dying to try them from all the conversations I hear about how good they group against the 6.5 bullets... ya run the numbers ballistically and they look good. I just wish I had some bare ones to try first... I have a rig for them 6/250 1:8 30" barrel that should work for the tests.

John, it is easy to remove the moly! I just "washed" 500 moly 115's Tubbs and they look as good a new....

I tore up some pieces of Never-Dull (the full can actually, it is only $5 or so Cdn) and put this in a blue Crown Royal bag (the bullets should be happy, that is really really good Cdn Whiskey) along with 500 moly coated 115g Tubb bullets (that I bought from another guy up here in Canada that just had to have some of these pills and was willing to jump thru the import/export permit hoops and costs for them) and all of this into a plastic bag. Still have 500 in moly in case I want to try them after I try the naked ones first!

Then I drove this "bag 'o bullets" around in the truck of car over the frozen bumps and ruts on the street for 10 minutes and after 1 day of just sitting on the bench after the little drive, the moly is about 90% gone.

A simple rubbing of a clean cloth and a bath in soap water and a rinse in the Ultrasonic and the bullets are as good as new.

Hope all the driving and Crown Royal did not permanently damage their ability to fly straight ha!

Keith
 
I just spray my molied bullets with brake cleaner (outside) and wipe with paper towel. Seems to get most of it off. I don't wax my bullets so have no idea how that will affect cleaning. However, brake cleaner should eat through any wax in a big hurry.

A little easier on the bullets then bouncing them in the trunk but I guess you do have to 'empty' the Crown Royal bag first so....

Jerry
 
Back
Top Bottom