cartridge pressures

farmnut said:
But I don't agree with the first paragraph, I don't think cartridge companies
specify different brass for higher pressure cartridges.

Well, there you are wrong. Section a few cases, and throw in a very modern cartridge like a WSM and you'll get it. As well, guntech knows what he's talking about, he's a well respected and very experienced gunsmith by the way...
 
Ardent said:
Well, there you are wrong. Section a few cases, and throw in a very modern cartridge like a WSM and you'll get it. As well, guntech knows what he's talking about, he's a well respected and very experienced gunsmith by the way...
Yes I know.
 
It's not neccesarily true that an action that chambers a high pressure round can be loaded to that pressure with lesser rounds. Although it's probably true to an extent.
Cartridge design and barrel wall thickness play a role.
Some cartridges for example exhibit more bolt thrust than others, while others may excert more pressure on the chamber walls.
Brass, the weakest link, is stronger than you think, and it plays a role also.
By stronger than you think, I'll use the example of some modern pistols, that leave a portion of the case unsupported. This, in 44 Mag!
A lot to consider.
 
farmnut said:
But I don't agree with the first paragraph, I don't think cartridge companies
specify different brass for higher pressure cartridges.

Actually they do design and specify the hardness of the finished brass. Some of the modern rounds only perform at the highest pressures because of this.

The Canadian Imperial Magnum line of cartridges was built using superior brass that handled higher pressures... the brass was made that way on purpose.
 
farmnut said:
Some of you might be confusing pressure units.
PSI and CUP.
My lyman 48th Edition Reloading Handbook lists
max. pressure for 300WSM approx.63000 PSI,
and for 300WM bit over 51000 CUP and bit over 63000 PSI.
Soo in pounds per square inch units pressure is the same.
FYI CUP-Copper units of pressure.

Right on! There are several diferent ways of measuring pressure. There is even LUP for lead units of pressure. This unit is how shotshell pressures of under 15,000 psi are measured.
Be sure you do not confuse the units of pressure.
 
Aside from the units etc. in use, it should be duly noted that SAAMMI is a manufacturing standards organisation.

Liability lawyers have as much to do with the wildly varying pressure standards, if not everything to do with them. Lawyers working towards sheilding their manufacturer clients from risk exposure.

They look at the guns available in a particular chambering, and set a standard that will prevent them from being sued if they blow up an old gun with a new load. The case of the 45-70 factory ammo that was mentioned earlier, illustrates this about the best. Factory ammo has to be safe in a Trapdoor as well as in a Ruger Number 1. You can load 45-70 for your Ruger that pushes on the heels of a 458 Win Mag, no problem shooting it, but it'll take that Trapdoor apart, and then some.

Same logic got the listed "max" loads dropped after they went way up in the various load manuals. If you compare a 15 or so year old manual, the max loads were hotter than they are now. The publishers tiptoed back from the cutting edge a bit.

I suspect that is also why Hornet ammo has been downgraded a touch as well, as it must be "lawyer" safe for the manufacturer, in the worst gun it is like to be fired in.

I'll go out on a limb, and say that I think the whole brass issue has little to do with it, other than the case construction must be on terms equal to the pressure expected.

In a properly built, modern firearm, with properly built brass (no ballon head antique stuff) I suspect that one could chamber it in about any older low pressure rifle cartridge, and handload it right up to the 60K psi range that the hot modern stuff handles.
If you have the means to know when you are reaching the limits, that is. That's the biggie. Gotta have an actual means to MEASURE the pressure to safely do this. Then you gotta be deadly certain that the ammo can NEVER find it's way into an old, loose, firearm, built when the now low pressure was the cutting edge of technology.

Cheers
Trev
 
Ardent said:
Well, there you are wrong. Section a few cases, and throw in a very modern cartridge like a WSM and you'll get it. As well, guntech knows what he's talking about, he's a well respected and very experienced gunsmith by the way...
Good advice. By all means do measure different types of brass. In fact it might be a good idea to do so before writing about it.
I have measured a bunch of different cases and virtually all have a web thickness of .200 -.210". A notable exception is some of the later 308 Norma and 7x61 Sharpe&Hart. these are down around .170. Everything else, from 45/70, 30/40 Krag, 303 British and the "very modern" 300WSM, measure from .195 -.210. The variation as much related to the brand as anything else.
Brass hardness, as mentioned by Dennis, does vary and might even be specifically varied according to the caliber. I have seen no evidence to support this however. Winchester brass is harder than Norma regardless of the caliber. Winchester 300 Win Mag brass will handle high pressure better than Norma 308 Norma Mag brass. This inspite of the fact the 308 Norma was always loaded to higher pressures.
Operating pressures for various cartridges are arrived at by SAAMI based upon what the industry as a whole feels is a safe level for a given cartridge. I'm quite sure the firearms chambered for the cartridge are an important consideration. So, a 30/06 is assigned a lower operating pressure out of deference to the '03 Springfields and '95 Winchesters in which it was chambered. The 270 was assigned a higher operating pressure primarily because Winchester had established it to be OK. The same is true of the 300 WSM. Winchester said these pressures are fine so it is accepted that they are. I suspect there might be some reduction in 300 WSM loadings in the future just as there was with the 300 Win Mag., The 7MM Rem., and the 308 Norma. When factory loads are leaving ejector slot marks on brass and primers are loosening, it's probably too hot!
So, in answer to the original question as to why pressures are different for similar cartridges in the same action; because the assigned working pressure is not necessarily based on the cartridge/rifle combination as tested. It is, instead, based on a combination of factors including established SAAMI working pressures which are , in turn, based on the history of the cartridge. A divergence from this is demonstrated by the published loading data for the 45/70. Although factory loads are loaded to very low pressures, virtually all loading manuals show 2 or 3 levels of data for the 45/70 depending upon the rifle type. Trapdoors are considered weak, Marlins and '86 Winchesters in the middle, and Ruger No. 1's at the top. In this case brass is plainly not a factor BTW. Loading manual publishers or writers are showing an awareness of the widely varying strengths and capabilities of the various firearms in which the 45/70 is chambered. The same thing could be done with other old cartridges but they probably feel it's just best not to confuse the issue.
For what it's worth, I have found Winchester 30/40 Krag brass to be very strong. In a strong action it can be loaded to very high pressures with no loosening of primer pockets etc. Does this mean I can use it in my old Krag rifle and load it to the nuts? Of course not. The Krag is limited by it's action strength or lack thereof.
For rifles which have a strong enough action where the brass can be considered to be the weak link; Gibb's criteria of "good case life with repeated reloading" is probably valid. In other words, if primer pockets don't loosen up after the third loading, pressures are probably OK with the brass/rifle combination in use. If they do loosen up; it's too hot.
In closing just let me say, in classic Gunnutz fashion, You guys are all full of crap! What a bunch of morons! Dintcha ever go to school?! :p :D Regards, Bill.
 
Leeper said:
Good advice. By all means do measure different types of brass. In fact it might be a good idea to do so before writing about it.
I have measured a bunch of different cases and virtually all have a web thickness of .200 -.210". A notable exception is some of the later 308 Norma and 7x61 Sharpe&Hart. these are down around .170. Everything else, from 45/70, 30/40 Krag, 303 British and the "very modern" 300WSM, measure from .195 -.210. The variation as much related to the brand as anything else.
Brass hardness, as mentioned by Dennis, does vary and might even be specifically varied according to the caliber. I have seen no evidence to support this however. Winchester brass is harder than Norma regardless of the caliber. Winchester 300 Win Mag brass will handle high pressure better than Norma 308 Norma Mag brass. This inspite of the fact the 308 Norma was always loaded to higher pressures.
Operating pressures for various cartridges are arrived at by SAAMI based upon what the industry as a whole feels is a safe level for a given cartridge. I'm quite sure the firearms chambered for the cartridge are an important consideration. So, a 30/06 is assigned a lower operating pressure out of deference to the '03 Springfields and '95 Winchesters in which it was chambered. The 270 was assigned a higher operating pressure primarily because Winchester had established it to be OK. The same is true of the 300 WSM. Winchester said these pressures are fine so it is accepted that they are. I suspect there might be some reduction in 300 WSM loadings in the future just as there was with the 300 Win Mag., The 7MM Rem., and the 308 Norma. When factory loads are leaving ejector slot marks on brass and primers are loosening, it's probably too hot!
So, in answer to the original question as to why pressures are different for similar cartridges in the same action; because the assigned working pressure is not necessarily based on the cartridge/rifle combination as tested. It is, instead, based on a combination of factors including established SAAMI working pressures which are , in turn, based on the history of the cartridge. A divergence from this is demonstrated by the published loading data for the 45/70. Although factory loads are loaded to very low pressures, virtually all loading manuals show 2 or 3 levels of data for the 45/70 depending upon the rifle type. Trapdoors are considered weak, Marlins and '86 Winchesters in the middle, and Ruger No. 1's at the top. In this case brass is plainly not a factor BTW. Loading manual publishers or writers are showing an awareness of the widely varying strengths and capabilities of the various firearms in which the 45/70 is chambered. The same thing could be done with other old cartridges but they probably feel it's just best not to confuse the issue.
For what it's worth, I have found Winchester 30/40 Krag brass to be very strong. In a strong action it can be loaded to very high pressures with no loosening of primer pockets etc. Does this mean I can use it in my old Krag rifle and load it to the nuts? Of course not. The Krag is limited by it's action strength or lack thereof.
For rifles which have a strong enough action where the brass can be considered to be the weak link; Gibb's criteria of "good case life with repeated reloading" is probably valid. In other words, if primer pockets don't loosen up after the third loading, pressures are probably OK with the brass/rifle combination in use. If they do loosen up; it's too hot.
In closing just let me say, in classic Gunnutz fashion, You guys are all full of crap! What a bunch of morons! Dintcha ever go to school?! :p :D Regards, Bill.

Post of the year! Leeper for President!
 
In closing just let me say, in classic Gunnutz fashion, You guys are all full of crap! What a bunch of morons! Dintcha ever go to school?! :p :D Regards, Bill.

I did. just they didn't cover cartridge pressures yet in grade 5. So what's yer point?:p
 
Leeper said:
In closing just let me say, in classic Gunnutz fashion, You guys are all full of crap! What a bunch of morons! Dintcha ever go to school?! :p :D Regards, Bill.

Right on Bill!

I should clarify that I don't believe any manufacturer has required brass hardness within their total production that would specifically vary from cartridge to cartridge. The total Canadian Imperial Magnums however were based on a very hard case head, harder than the rest of the ammo makers and could withstand much higher pressures.

Right from about 1968 I have found Winchester brass to be considerably harder than Norma brass.
 
Right, hardness isn't in SAAMI's specs anywhere for a cartridge. Seems like an oversight to me, as dead soft annealed case heads sound like a recipe for disaster.

Furthermore, I don't suspect that a given manufacturer (say, winchester) produces cases with differing hardnesses. Thier 45-70 and their 308 are probably exactly the same as far as hardness goes.
 
Part of the problem is where the pressure measurement is taken SAAMI uses an older system than CIP. CIP loadings are often stiffer because there is more consistency in their measurement method. There is a greater degree of confidence.

To go back to the original question, another reason is that the experience and calculations of ammunition standard specifiers have proven these loads to be safe, within the expected deviation of that load combination. A load that has a higher Standard Deviation must be loaded down to ensure safety.

Remember that these specifications result in cartridges that are safe in firearms that are in reasonably good condition. The factors that determine this are many and complex; that's just the way it is!
 
Back
Top Bottom