Finally found the time to put together a few rounds and get out to the range. I decided to share my "failure" to hopefully inspire/instruct/intimidate

the others. My targets didn't satisfy the group size, which may be a more common problem for many of us. Ten shots is a lot to make without a single flyer. I apologize for not using the calipers but it shouldn't matter since I'm not claiming to have attained the criteria.
Here are the boolits, cast from lead picked up at indoor range, mostly .22 and lead pistol boolits, don't know hardness but will eventually measure it. It's pretty soft.
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/aAloxed_gas-checked_zps5b8a5b40.jpg.html?sort=9&o=0
Iron Sights
Savage 1899 .303 Savage, (year 1916) with Marbles tang peep sight. 26" barrel 1:12", slugged .302"-.308"
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/b1899_setup_zps23236945.jpg.html?sort=9&o=1
View from the shooting bench: no sky makes for a boring view, and if your trajectory isn't flat enough, 200 yards is off limits.
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/c1899_setup_zoom_zpsc6e77a28.jpg.html?sort=9&o=2
Boolit used for this test: Lyman 311467 (185gr), Lee Aloxed and sized/gas-checked to .309"
Brass: assorted (Imperial, Dominion) .30-30 brass resized to .303Sav, with a single wrap of 1/4"-wide masking tape around the base. Now before anyone gets their sheriff's badge out, I've loaded and shot about 100 or so using this method, and they actually perform
better than the real .303 Savage brass. I have an ample supply of the latter but it doesn't hold up more for than a couple of these low-pressure reloads before failing, with neck cracking or total separation. Annealing didn't seem to make much difference. The .30-30 brass is simply better for the loads I shoot in the 1899.
Primer: Winchester Large Rifle
Charge: 18gr IMR 4227
The same round except with 18gr H4198 chronographed last summer at 1400fps...
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/d303Sav_reloads_3030brass_zpsb230d4e5.jpg.html?sort=9&o=3
Conditions: 0degC, snow, wind from 9:00 @ 20mph
10 shots at 100 yards (10 minute relay)
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/e1899303Savage_100yds_20141114_zps9cf4d97c.jpg.html?sort=9&o=4
Spread: 4.75"
6 shots completely inside 1.75" circle
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/f1899303Savage_100yds_20141114_remarks_zpsc4f9046e.jpg.html?sort=9&o=5
I realized after finishing that the peep-sight aperture eyepiece had shaken loose! So I could blame the flyers on that, except that my last shots were the ones with the tightest grouping !!
Scoped Rifle
Savage 99F .300 Savage (year 1951). 22" barrel 1:16", slugged .302"-.308". Scope is a Redfield 4X
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/gSavage99_setup_zps5715900f.jpg.html?sort=9&o=6
Boolit for this test: Lyman 311467 (185gr), Lee Aloxed and sized/gas-checked to .309"
Brass: assorted (Imperial, Dominion, R-P)
Primer: Winchester Large Rifle
Charge: 22gr IMR 4227
Chronographed at 1779 fps.
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/h300Sav_cartridges_zps2fc24c17.jpg.html?sort=9&o=7
I had loaded some of the Lee C312-185 boolits, but didn't shoot them this time.
Conditions: 0degC, snow, wind from 9:00 20mph.
10 shots at 100 yards (10 minute relay)
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/iSav99300Savage_100yds_20141114_zps4bd1ac39.jpg.html?sort=9&o=8
Spread: 3.125"
9 shots completely inside 2.25" circle
http://s1093.photobucket.com/user/nilsek/media/CB-target/jSav99300Savage_100yds_20141114_remarks_zps764a7499.jpg.html?sort=9&o=9
Earlier this year I had shot the same loads, as well as some using H4198. The latter gave tighter grouping, but they were shot at 50 yards. This 100-yard challenge is, well, more challenging. I hope to eventually do some more ten-shot strings to see if the H4198 loads are indeed superior, as well as testing the Lee C312-185 boolits more thoroughly.