Cast vs Forged vs Billet

Don't worry, I don't design planes, I just manufacture plane and jet parts to the specs supplied on the prints and solid models.
I will end here as I am bored and am going to build some Romanian Ak's today.
:)
 
Oh, come on, man... you are getting aggressive here.
All I did was to ask a couple of innocent questions and
you started swinging that eutectic above your head
like you want to scare the peaceful by-standers or sumpin.


Sorry, it was not my intention to get agressive. Apologies to anyone I offended

I tend to get verbal diarrhea when explaining things
 
I wouldn't even want to figure out how multidirectional the loading on a AR platform would be.
[...]
Picture is macroetch of aluminum billets that has gone through a 50% upset forge

Good point. Predicting the loading on a connecting rod is going to be straightforward, hence forging is good for that application (as mentioned by a previous poster). While the primary loading on an AR - the recoil impulse - is predictable, all of the other usages complicate things. Even then, a forged AR has significant machining - such as breaching or EDMing the magwell - to add further complications.

On the second item - great pictures and supporting text.
 
OK.

So, you make a convincing case for billet and forging being a wash in the application under discussion. Is it therefore fair to say that bragging that your AR receiver is 100% Billet Machined Aluminum is marketing hogwash when every other AR receiver on the planet is forged, and therefore at least as good?
 
Sorry, it was not my intention to get agressive. Apologies to anyone I offended

I tend to get verbal diarrhea when explaining things
No, I am the one who is sorry because I didn't make it clear
that what I said about aggressivity was a joke
(I should have put smileys in my post or something).

However, you decided to ignore almost all questions you were asked.
Any special reason for that?
:)
 
Back
Top Bottom