Consider the .350 Rem Mag. - with the new 200gr TTSX it would be plenty from close out to 300 yards.
You should be able to get 2700 fps out of a 16.5" barrel:
2.8" high at 100 gives you a zero at 223 yards and -7.2 at 300 yards. The bullet is still moving along at just over 2000 fps at 300 and has 1825 ft-lbs and 59.7 lb-ft/s of momentum. In other words - more than enough go for moose and elk at 300 yards.
That would hurt me as much as it hurts the deer/bear/mooseseses.
In a 6.5lb rifle it would be about 29lbs of recoil.
A 45-70 with a full power 400gr load at 1800 fps in a 6.5lb rifle will have 40lbs of recoil.
Whelen B, I'm thinking about ordering a couple of barrels at 16.5 inches each for the Encore. The purpose of the rifle would be mostly deep woods backpacking and hunting. One barrel would be a rimfire for plinking and small game, and the other would be a centerfire for deer/moose or putting down a black bear.
This would leave the overall length just over 30". IE: lots of nasty muzzle blast. Recoil doesn't bother me as much as the noise. I like my ears.
Is the .35 Remington very easy to find in small towns? Would the .30-30 be a better player for a generalist short rifle cartridge if not? Seems like there would be more .30-30 out there than .44 magnum as well...?
That's better than I thought it would be. I think the .308 produces about 22 ft-lbs of recoil. The muzzle blast would be interesting from all three. That's why I wonder about .44 Magnum and .30-30: Maybe they'd be the 7x57 of short-ass carbines...
How would .45-70 muzzle blast and recoil be in a 6 pound carbine? Would I care to shoot it much?



























