**Checked out a Baikal SxS - ***Pics added***

These are the exact questions I'd ask too.
I don't know much about doubles so please keep the info coming.
Why would a lighter bullet shoot wider? Are they regulated to shoot POA @100 or just keep the bbl center-diam distance as two parallel trajectories?
Shed some light for the noobs.
 
The action looks very much like my Bailal 12 guage side by side. I'm wondering if all they did was fit barrels to one.
My 12 guage was stiff for some time, but now has broken in nicely. That gun has much better wood than mine.
 
eltorro said:
These are the exact questions I'd ask too.
I don't know much about doubles so please keep the info coming.
Why would a lighter bullet shoot wider? Are they regulated to shoot POA @100 or just keep the bbl center-diam distance as two parallel trajectories?
Shed some light for the noobs.


Hey, I don't even know what I am talking about:D I am just flying by the seat of my pants here. Anything I am saying could be wrong, or totaly opposite of the truth.

The thing that I do know for sure about doubles is that there is no hard fast rules about regulation. Sometimes the gun reacts totaly different than expected.

If you could get thes guns to regulate at 100 yards with any ammo you would be doing good. I would be happy with a 4" four shot group (right, left right, left bbl) at 100.

I think how the gun shoots is all dependent on recoil timming. The things that affect regulation are, bullet weight, bullet shape, velocity, type of powder& pressure generated, how you hold the rifle, if there is a scope on the rifle and mabey even if the shooter is left or right handed.

I know that you cannot shoot the rifle off the bench and expect it to allways regulate the same as standing free hand. This is just because of how the gun moves as you fire it. A regular rifle has the bbl in a straigt line with the stock and your sholder. The recoil causes it to move up and back. With a sxs double the bbls are to the side of the center of the stock. Under recoil the gun moves up, back and to the side. The right bbl will push to the right the left to the left. This sideways movement will affect the flight of the bullet in relation to where the muzzle jumps as the bullet leaves the end of the bbl. No doubt a heavy recoiling rifle at low velocity will increase the problem (shoot farther to the left and right)

It is this action that causes a heavy bullet (more recoil slower velocity) to shoot wide. In contrast a light bullet (low recoil) will zip out of the bbl quicker (before the bbl moves to far due to recoil) and will not shoot as wide.

The bbs on a regular double (not the Baikal) are pointed together (cross eyed) to compensate for this and are set for a certain load (as in one brand of shells at one weight, like 180g winchester power points). Regulation can be done only in one way, by shooting it, taking the bbls apart, resetting them then trying them agiain. Lots of man hours of highly skilled labour. Very expensive. The Baikal has a jack screw that lets the owner push the bbls farther apart or let them ride closer together. One bbl will be fixed the other is the free floater that can be adjusted. This introduces another problem, one bbl is fixed the other can be set with varing pressure on it. As anyone who has played with forend pressure knows this can adversly affect the accuracy of the gun. A double can only be as accurate as it's worst bbl. If introducing a pressure point on the bbl causes bad vibrations that bbl could be shooting all over the place. Additionaly as the bbls heat up (remember 4 shot groups) the pressure on the jack screw can change. All of this is going on with one bbl, mean while the other is fixed (and is #### stiff from the rib running down between bbls) and can shoot entirely differently.

Add to all that the fact there is no adjustement for up and down. What if one bbl shoots 6" higher than the other at 50 yards? You will never get any better than a 6" group unless you can find a load that shoots better.

I have herd that when a double is fed ammo that is totoaly wrong you cannot get it to hit a 4x8 sheet of plywood at 100 yards. Hopefully things won't be that bad.

Take all this with a grain of salt as I don;t realy know what I am taking about .:D
 
Last edited:
Right.........:(
So what you're saying is that anyone buying one of these had better go invest in around 10 boxes of factory ammo in varying bullets weights.
Then work out which weight puts them on the board closest together.
Then start dialing up loads in this bullet weight being careful to find out which bbl is most accurate with which load.
Then once this is determined only EVER shoot with this load.
In the 30-06 you'd be hoping it is reasonably heavy, say 180 or above, because folks are buying these for bear hunting & the like, aren't they?
BTW, is it possible that one bbl will shoot amazingly with one bullet & terribly with anything else and & vice versa for the other bbl, meaning you have to use individual loads for each bbl or would you split the difference and just get them as close as you can?
Oh, I'm presuming we can't expect any more than 100yds of respectable accuracy out of this baby.
Out of interest, does anyone own one of the Pedersoli Kodiak double rifles?
 
That is basicly what I am suggesting. Some doubles can shoot different weight bullets and still have them regulate ok but it depends on the gun. Regular doubles with fixed bbs are very stiff (think heavy bbl varmit rifle stiff) and have high quality bbls. They can be very accurrate and should be for $8000 ++++ $$$$$$. But are usualy regulated for a max of 100 yards and soemtimes 75 yards for dangerous game rifles. After that the bbls usualy start to cross. You still might get good accuracy out to 150 or 200 yards.

One good thing is that the bbls look exacty the same as the Baikal single shots wich are getting a rep for decent accuracy. Hopefully they will be good quality bbls that shoot everything well. Hopefully that will help out when trying to regulate.

A handloader can do some experimenting and between adjusting the jack screw and creative loads and may get something that works good. Some guns might be good from the factory others may be terrible. They are only a $1000 double. How much man hours do you think are going to go into them for testing? Actualy I would rather pay $1400 for a gun that has been tested and regulated to shoot good at the factory than pay $700 for one that was just slapped together with the hope that the jack screw alone will get it shooting.

I can't wait to get my hands on one of these, I have not put one on order anywhere. I have been waiting to hear what they shoot like first. If it is anything like the Baikal over under they could be a dissapointment. On top of that I have heard it is easyer to regulate a overunder than a SxS.

Who knows what to expect from these. Double rifle= Double trouble

Hopefully someone who knows more or has worked with a double will chime in, hell I have never even shot one before.:redface: :confused:
 
How did the Valmet O/U shoot? They weren't very expensive, were they? I was excited to get one of these, but after looking it over (twice), and reading this stuff I think I will stay away from it. So much for pretending I am shooting a Cape Buffalo with a .470 Nitro SxS when in reality I am lining up on a button buck on Texada with a Baikal! :redface:
 
I had a chance to inspect one last Friday. It was a .30-06, price was $1040, plus tax. My first impression was that it was just plain crude. Checkering was horrible, finishing detail was basic, as was stock contouring. It was light and handy. If it shot well, it might be interesting. The extractors for rimless cartridges remind me of ones on Savage 24s. Don't know how well sticky cases would be handled.
 
And here I was hoping the Baikal SxS was going to be a possible solution for those of us wanting a double who are poverty stricken..... :(
Guys, you talk about the rough finish on these.
Is it actually the aesthetics you speak of, as these could be cleaned up with a little gunsmith attention and TLC, so long as she shoots reasonably of course.
 
My wife has been shooting an O/U Baikal for ahilw, there are tones of them at our Skeet club. I have seen a few of the SXS and owned one. After about 100 rounds on a real hot day I catually had the solder let go o n the rib, Baikal was going to replace except it had been modified (shortened stock) so they paid for the repair.
Other than that I hear they are quite good.
I guess Baikals are really big in Italy.
 
Has anyone had the opportunity to test one of these yet? I've searched the internet and can't find a single review.

I've read a couple reviews - but not much. And i'm pretty sure it's been reworked a little since then.

We're just going to have to wait till they hit the market and start selling.

Btw - i believe they're selling as 'spartans' in the states.
 
I was refering to the MP221 Artemeda double rifle, my understanding is that they are only availible in 30-06 at the moment. I found lots of Baikal shotgun reviews and for the most part they sound ok for the money.
 
I ordered the .45/70 last year and paid a deposit. I was to have it last September, then October and so on and now they are saying July of this year. I looked over the rifle in these pictures and I am not even excited about getting the one I ordered and I got a price a year ago of $799++. This rifle is crude to say the least. The action, pins and fitting were terrible. I will still take the one on order but I suspect it will be on here pretty fast. I had a Pedersoli Kodiak .45/70 double a few years ago and it was so far above this Baikal it's frightfull. I had a new Baikal single rifle this past year too and was not impressed. Doubles are not cheap, but these things feel like very cheap rifles, not even as good as an old single CIL shotgun by appearance.
 
Back
Top Bottom