Chiappa Double Badger .22LR/20ga Range Report

SteelFlint

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
156   0   0
Location
BC
With the help received from my fellow CGNers on my first Chiappa Double Badger, I thought I'd offer the range review below on this newest $500ish toy. Before I get into it, I should note that this is my second DB; not out of favour, but instead a replacement after I sent the first one back due to some really bad finishing defects on the receiver when it was brand new out of the box.

The combo market as I understand it is quite small, ergo the highly limited choices in this genre of firearms, but this second DB certainly does not disappoint. I'm personally a big fan of drillings, and wanted a rabbit gun that is something different than the levers that all my buddies have, so landed on the Chiappa DB. Yeah yeah Savage made one, but they are not the most atheistically designed in my mind.

Just as most other reviewers have found, she came folded in a slim box, and the was covered in corrugated box dust. No matter, a quick tear-down and clean, as I do with any new acquisition, easily addressed the minor nuisance. The wood is obviously not Winchester grade of any level, but sufficiently solid with enough checkering for grip. Some complain about the inherent weight of this setup, but I think wooden stocks are of proper decorum for the woods, and in any case the weight yields a much more stable platform than its sibling, the Little Badger. I think I read somewhere that the receivers are milled steel and not some cheap alloy - and after dropping her on concrete on this first trip out (doh), the damage was indeed barely noticeable. The fibre-plastic sights are cheap and I anticipate easy breakage without due care, but they do work surprisingly well for what they are worth. The rear sight is solidly fixed with a couple of screws and sits on dovetail millings, so can be dismounted and replaced with powered optics. I'm thinking a pistol style red dot so as not to disrupt the form factor too much when collapsed - the DB does indeed fit inside larger CamelBaks for those who are wondering.

Range performance was excellent: she spits out .22LR CCIs with little fanfare, almost scoffing at the lack of challenge doing 1" groupings out to 50m even when freehanded. Winchester 20 slugs were equally impressive, and the primary calibre of intent for the DB is authoritative and predictable. I have some confidence in her ability to stop larger beasts, with the right load and if really needed. The 20ga has replaceable chokes over the .410. Unfortunately, range I was at today does not allow birdshot, but I look forward to a live test on a lucky grouse.

To be honest, I'm not sure I'm a convert of Chiappa just yet; indeed, I had my reservations on initial order, given the lacklustre reviews elsewhere on their general build quality. This is consistent with my version: can't say that the upper and receiver mate perfectly, and the blueing seems to scar easily.

This might sound counterintuitive at this point, but all in all I have no misgivings about any of these observations. I bought my DB with every intention of packing it into the woods - she a camping/outdoors tool and meets this measure in every respect. It's a simple and solid design, just not executed by Gucci. I will provide updates after I get some mileage for sure.

One recommendation if you do pick up this utilitarian switchblade: get snap caps/shells. The DB has an internal hammer which cocks with the release lever, which you must pull to break open the action - so she's hot and ready even when you're just pulling out your final shells. Given the initial build observations, I think the DB demands somewhat more attention to safety and upkeep than its peers. Did I mention this thing was five hundy? Hard to beat at this price point I think for what you are getting, at the end of the day. I have .177s that cost more lol.

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
I just don’t have high expectations for $500.

Although I should say I will likely not buy anything Chiappa again. They are like a Hyundai - not worth the troubles.
 
If you are buying chiappa you are going into it with your eyes open, don't be expecting very high quality. I own both the little and double badgers, the little badger is one of my favorite guns. I am not as impressed with the double badger I have in 22/410 and actually prefer my savage model 42.

I think it may have something to do with the fact that I prefer exposed hammers.
 
I have watched youtube videos of the double badger discharging upon closing the gun up. I would be all over the .22/20 gauge combo, but safety worries me. The trigger on my little badger is scary light too.
 
I think it may have something to do with the fact that I prefer exposed hammers.


Agreed. As I mentioned in original review... this one requires more attention to safety than most other firearms. This point alone scores major negative points in my book.
 
If you are buying chiappa you are going into it with your eyes open, don't be expecting very high quality. I own both the little and double badgers, the little badger is one of my favorite guns. I am not as impressed with the double badger I have in 22/410 and actually prefer my savage model 42.

I think it may have something to do with the fact that I prefer exposed hammers.

Bingo on the exposed hammers! Better safety feature IMO. Too bad Savage doesn't do a 42 in 22/20ga, like their old camper gun.
 
Chiappa makes FANTASTIC guns...... for people that only half expect a loud noise when they pull the trigger...
 
I have one in .22WMR/.410 that a bought a few years back for my daughter to use. She never did bag a grouse with it, but I've taken a few. As the OP stated, for what it is, it serves well. It certainly won't win any beauty contests, but it is solidly functional. It shoots to point of aim with the rimfire and the shot barrel, so no complaints there. Thus far, I've only got two complaints. The first is addressed in the OP, in regard to the rear sight being somewhat flimsy. Mine actually fell off and I didn't realize it until I pulled up on a grouse and realized I was going to have to Kentucky windage it. Much to my surprise, that bird succumbed to the .410 barrel as did a few more before the rear sight was found on the camp floor. However, thanks goes to the OP as I had not thought about mounting an optic on this gun until I came across this thread...I may just do that to alleviate the combination of a flimsy sight and older (but never good) eyes.

My only other gripe was the pivot screw (the exact/better term escapes me at the moment) that allows it to fold. That was so tight I almost had to place a call to Arnold Scharzenegger to fold/unfold it. However, that's extremely minor as all I had to do was back it out a bit.

Other than that, the gun has done just fine; no serious complaints.
 
Back
Top Bottom