The top tier of both Russian and Chinese are of comparable quality and functionality, with pieces of crap on both sides of the fence.
There case closed, mic drop
To be more specific, it's about the current batch of beat to ####, mismatched late model Chinese SKS we can get, vs the Molot Russian refurbs which are in better shape, all matching, force matching, or possiby mismatch mag for the same price...
Now THAT is something I can get behind!
I have an identical gun to this one. Easily on par to the build quality of the soviet rifles. Weird eh? Its almost like the Russians and Chinese collaborated and made these guns in China under Russian supervision!!
They only worked with them temporarily. They "gave" a bunch of factories to China to help rebuild them after the war. Then China and Russia had a fallout. Russian wanted China to pay back everything Russia "gave" them. China had no money so Russia took all their food. A lot of Chinese people starved to death during those times. They were horrible times. To get food for the county, China traded SKS to other countries just for some food.
The Soviet technicals were out of China by mid 1960. But 1955-1960 is more than a "temporary" stay.
and what would you call it if it is not temporary?
I would call it what it is: 6 years.
Law school is a three year degree, as is a master's degree in engineering. And a medical degree is 7-8 year program.
I wouldn't call any of those temporary.
When Boris was running the Chinese factory to Russian specs, quality was just as good as in the Motherland. No arguments there.... except Boris didn't stick around too long, that's all.
They only worked with them temporarily. .
You haven't got a clue what temporary means.