CN, as in Canadian National, did not exist until after the War. In 1916 it was still three separate lines: Canadian Northern Grand Trunk and Grand Trunk Pacific. They went broke and were nationalised in 1917 and ran until after the war as the Canadian Government Railways. Following the war, the new network was renamed Canadian National partly in order to use all the equipment from the Canadian Northern (including dining-car linens and dishes)which already was marked "CN".
Far as I know, they didn't shoot hobos riding the rods during the Depression. They left that to the RCMP. Read up on the Regina Massacre and the "On to Ottawa" trek in 1934. LOTS of fun: out-of-work guys going to Ottawa to beg the Government to do something to help.... and the forces of Law, Order and Good Government give them a dose of lead poisoning after zero provocation. Actual figures of the killed were (and are) grossly under-reported by the media: I knew men who were there, men who already had 4 years of experience at counting dead friends, and they said that the papers were lying.
.

Good you're confirming what I thought.
The receiver is 'N' marked which I understand to be 'Naval' service.
The CN to me must be Canadian Navy however I see no C /!\ stamps.
CN, as in Canadian National, did not exist until after the War. In 1916 it was still three separate lines: Canadian Northern Grand Trunk and Grand Trunk Pacific. They went broke and were nationalised in 1917 and ran until after the war as the Canadian Government Railways. Following the war, the new network was renamed Canadian National partly in order to use all the equipment from the Canadian Northern (including dining-car linens and dishes)which already was marked "CN".
Far as I know, they didn't shoot hobos riding the rods during the Depression. They left that to the RCMP. Read up on the Regina Massacre and the "On to Ottawa" trek in 1934. LOTS of fun: out-of-work guys going to Ottawa to beg the Government to do something to help.... and the forces of Law, Order and Good Government give them a dose of lead poisoning after zero provocation. Actual figures of the killed were (and are) grossly under-reported by the media: I knew men who were there, men who already had 4 years of experience at counting dead friends, and they said that the papers were lying.
.
Good point, Maplesugar: butt ID and date of manufactre do not of necessity coincide.
I once saw a really good riot while I was living in Vancouver. Two thousand people standing in the street hollering "Yay, Roughriders!" and then the VCP moved in, turned the dogs loose on the crowd. Television and still cameras were their first targets (that's why no photos in the papers the next day), then the cops went ape on the crowd. They were picking out the people who were NO trouble and beating the living crap out of them, ignoring most of the others. I will never forget this one guy, trying to shield his girlfriend and get her moved out of the way.... two cops, one on each side, nightsticks.... he was a bloody ruin when they (literally) threw him into the paddywagon; she was hysterical.
There was a lot of flak over the police "handling" of the "riot". For one thing, it wasn't a riot: it was an attack by 50 heavily-armed men on a peaceful crowd. And there was no "handling" of anything except nightsticks. There were a lot of dog-bites that night, too: something that never went in the papers. The hospitals had instructions not to treat riot injuries, the instructions given BEFORE the riot started. It was planned. The Vancouver Police pleaded that they needed more money for training so they could "handle" these things better. They got it... and bought new machine-guns. I haven't attended a Grey Cup celebration since.
I love my country... but I am also scared spitless of the people who run it.
.



























