It looks like a lot of people missed the significance of your test.
That is, that even in the severe cold and even with ball powder, there is no appreciable difference between using a standard primer or a magnum primer.
I guess all the hand loaders who were reloading with every major type of smokeless powder for sixty years or so, before the magnum primers came on the market, and shooting in the most severest of weather, were not handicapped for lack of a better primer.
And the 30-30 type rifles that killed so many moose and elk in the years of the great depression, often in very severe cold, were just doing what they were designed to do.
Your test of the 30-30 I thought was quite significant, in that your load of 30 grains of 3031 powder is quite a light load, but still gave 2050 fps. A 30-30 was designed to give 2200 fps with 170 grain bullets and the older factory loads actually do give this velocity. An older du Pont reloading chart that I have, which is marked, "New Edition," shows 32 grains of 3031 for that velocity and that is close to what I got in summer weather. At one time the standard load for a 30-30 was considered to be 33 grains of 3031. I have used this load, but didn't test it over the chronograph. My point is that there must be little, if any, difference in 3031 powder, between summer and winter temperatures, judging by the good velocity you got with 30 grains in the 30-30.
I too, would like to see you test the 270 again.
What I really wish is that I could hand you some of my old war surplus H4831 to test. With my 24 inch Sako 270, 60 grains of that powder with 130 grain bullets, gives me 3078 fps, while their "newly" manufactured H4831 powder from the 1970s gave 2960 fps. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if their H4831 is now slower yet, giving lower velocities, which would correspond closely with the figures of most of your 270 readings.
By the way, the cold in no way should affect the lead in wires to your chronograph.
Bruce