Why is a neutered AK mag more desirable?
I find the Russians better looking and better rifles than the Yugos.
It's not about the neutered AK mag it is an AK "style" magazine release. The capacity of the magazine is not the point.
I think overall , gunners prefer a detacheable magazine model when they are shopping for a semi auto firearm..... I think we an all agree on that?
or does the majority disagree with that statement? I don't think so judging by the fervor which gunners are buying the current detacheable magazine firearms.
So I suppose with the vast majority of sks rifles in canada being 5round fixed mag models and the SKS-D being the only one of them to be detacheable magazine fed , they are "worth" near as much as other firearms in x39 that china produces in the semi auto magazine fed format. The type 81 for example..... I doubt the quality is any better than an in the box chinese sks-d.
Anyways it is all a matter of opinion and I don't expect everyone to share mine. I've owned a lot of sks rifles over the years and always prefered the sks-d.
Back when 4 of us bought a pallet of sks rifles from allen lever in the 90's , we had a mixed lot of the "hunter" with the monte carlo type stock with rubber buttpad and 5rnd short AK mags and the standard sliding mag release , the "paratrooper" with fixed magazine, 10 shots and the SKS-D with 2 30rnd mags and the AK style mag release.
There were no magazine limits then and we frequently went to crown land here in BC and shot of cases and cases of ammo with 30round mags. They all had crappy triggers but that was easily remedied with a little know how.
Anyways it is all relative to a persons own experiences and mine have been mostly positive when it comes to the D model and I have probably..... most likely , owned and shot a whole lot more of them than most folks here. Haven't owned a russian or a yugo or one of the newer sks imports though I have been tempted to pick one up...... I just prefer the D models LOL