Colt Canada receivers: SA 20/15.7 stamped vs regular CC/Diemaco stamped

[vp6111]

I've seen quite a few EE and where people state express preference for receivers Colt Canada/Diemaco/5.56mm stamps and almost disdain for receivers with SA 20/15.7 stamps. Any legitimate or rational reasons for this, i.e. quality, fit, functionality?

Thanks in advance.

 

[Unhinged]

Quality fit and function are equal on both.

Some guys have rollmark preferences.

 

[Rebel Rouser]

Ocd

 

[lerch641]

Quality fit and function are equal on both.

Some guys have rollmark preferences.

This.

There's a few different rollmarks out, as the SA20/SA15.7, or CC with 5.56mm, or CC without 5.56mm.
I preferred the 5.56mm for my C8 clone.

 

[call2arms]

Personally I don’t like a roll mark on the right hand side of the receiver. For no specific reason

 

[Tarrantula]

I also am not a fan of the right side markings

 

[Lungorthin]

I also am not a fan of the right side markings

+1
Even if it was the only option, I'd pass. Too ugly

 

[benchmade]

I bought a SA15.7 upper and built my own using the standard CC lower because i didn't like the markings on the SA's (and i wanted green furniture).

 

[khw]

what if it says

SR-15 5.56mm
KNIGHT'S MFG. CO.

 

[Fuzzy Wool Hat]

If Colt Canada would release their receivers with other roll marks such as their L119a2 markings, law enforcement markings, etc my clone-correct OCD would be so very very satisfied...

 

[dekin4]

OBSESSIVE over 1 pic or either the same dozen pics versus the (100'000) produced

colt can/diemaco has been making these for dozens of years and they have been changing the markings as the years