Colt Python Cylinder Lock-up
- Thread starter Astaziel
- Start date
I have Altamont grips that came on my Pro Shop 686-6 and they are the BEST S&W grips I've ever had! No finger grooves that don't fit anyone's hand. I'm hoping that the Python grips coming in the mail will be similar. They looked like it in the pictures.
Next best grips on a S&W are the Miculek grips on my 4" M29.
I have a brand new set of Altamont "Silverback Diamond" grips on one of my M66s and while beautiful, do not fit my hand. I'll happily sell them or trade them off for something more suitable.
Next best grips on a S&W are the Miculek grips on my 4" M29.
I have a brand new set of Altamont "Silverback Diamond" grips on one of my M66s and while beautiful, do not fit my hand. I'll happily sell them or trade them off for something more suitable.
Re: Pythons in general .....
While beautifully finished inside and out, from a shooter's point of view, I really don't know what you get that you don't with a S&W pre-lock S&W M19 or M27.
Oh, I forgot ... the Pythons have a left hand twist with a choked bore. This is said to produce better groups. And arguably the most unergonomic grip of any revolver, IMHO. But grips are a very subjective thing. Only a few are universally liked by most.
I think part of it is the mystic of the Python name and the fact that they are "old school" in design and workmanship. As for shootability, I'll take any of my S&W's over this Python.
I can't comment on the NEW Python, but it certainly is getting mixed reviews.
While beautifully finished inside and out, from a shooter's point of view, I really don't know what you get that you don't with a S&W pre-lock S&W M19 or M27.
Oh, I forgot ... the Pythons have a left hand twist with a choked bore. This is said to produce better groups. And arguably the most unergonomic grip of any revolver, IMHO. But grips are a very subjective thing. Only a few are universally liked by most.
I think part of it is the mystic of the Python name and the fact that they are "old school" in design and workmanship. As for shootability, I'll take any of my S&W's over this Python.
I can't comment on the NEW Python, but it certainly is getting mixed reviews.
Sharps'74,
I agree with you...but it is the same argument as going from A to B in a Toyota Corolla or a Lamborghini.
It's all what you desire ( and in the case of the Lambo, what is in your wallet).
I sold a beautiful Ruger GP-100 when the Python was re-born, and to each its own, both are outstanding but the looks of the Python are murder.
And, so far, no problem with the 2020, serial number in the 0058.. range.
I agree with you...but it is the same argument as going from A to B in a Toyota Corolla or a Lamborghini.
It's all what you desire ( and in the case of the Lambo, what is in your wallet).
I sold a beautiful Ruger GP-100 when the Python was re-born, and to each its own, both are outstanding but the looks of the Python are murder.
And, so far, no problem with the 2020, serial number in the 0058.. range.
Glad to hear you are enjoying your new Python. Looks like Colt cured the early teething problems. Yes, the Pythons are 'eye candy' for sure. But you pay for that ego boosting pride of ownership.
I wouldn't elevate the Python to the Lamborghini level. The Korth maybe. But would I shoot a Korth and do I have the skill set to really get the best from it? Driving a Lamborghini would not make me a competent Formula 1 racer.
The question is: is it worth it to the owner? I honestly wish I had invested in a pre-lock S&W M27 in the same condition as the Python I bought.
I spent some time dry-firing the Python at the TV set last night. Because I spend considerable time doing the same thing with my S&Ws, it was able to manage the 'stacking' DA pull quite well. I also hold well, so I could do the same in SA mode to the point where I could put a dime in the ribbed barrel, snap the hammer and not dislodge the dime.
Then I picked up my Pro Shop 686-6 ..... a few silky DA pulls later, I put the Python away. I can index this and any of my other S&Ws to the point where I may as well grind the thumb piece off the hammers.
I wouldn't elevate the Python to the Lamborghini level. The Korth maybe. But would I shoot a Korth and do I have the skill set to really get the best from it? Driving a Lamborghini would not make me a competent Formula 1 racer.
The question is: is it worth it to the owner? I honestly wish I had invested in a pre-lock S&W M27 in the same condition as the Python I bought.
I spent some time dry-firing the Python at the TV set last night. Because I spend considerable time doing the same thing with my S&Ws, it was able to manage the 'stacking' DA pull quite well. I also hold well, so I could do the same in SA mode to the point where I could put a dime in the ribbed barrel, snap the hammer and not dislodge the dime.
Then I picked up my Pro Shop 686-6 ..... a few silky DA pulls later, I put the Python away. I can index this and any of my other S&Ws to the point where I may as well grind the thumb piece off the hammers.
I have not handled a new model Colt, But I have had quite a few old models, some unfired, some I shot quite a bit.
The last one was a later model 6 in , and the DA pull stacked bad, single action , great. This was all stock. I don't really like long barrels, so it was " collector gun" yep, I have those.
A real early model, about 1960 was great, no stacking . I think it was original? ie stock.
The best I had, which I sold this spring, in a moment of insanity, was a 4 in 357 model. That was as good as any Python I have ever owned. It would have been late 50"s, never checked.
Tight as a drum, and Colts turn the "Right " way.
I have a tuned 4 in s-w 19-2 that is as good , almost, as that 357, just don't feel as solid., Mind you the 19 has had a lot of round through it. I shot a PPC gun built by a master and Lordy.
The Ruger is a strong gun, and a good trigger if worked on, just don't do it for me.
The Old Dan Wesson's had a great lock up, took getting use to, they locked the crain to the frame, Needed ? , I don't know.
I had trouble with L loaders with the colt, , Python ones O.K. , But that gun had the early target grips, and interfered a bit with the L ones.
The last one was a later model 6 in , and the DA pull stacked bad, single action , great. This was all stock. I don't really like long barrels, so it was " collector gun" yep, I have those.
A real early model, about 1960 was great, no stacking . I think it was original? ie stock.
The best I had, which I sold this spring, in a moment of insanity, was a 4 in 357 model. That was as good as any Python I have ever owned. It would have been late 50"s, never checked.
Tight as a drum, and Colts turn the "Right " way.
I have a tuned 4 in s-w 19-2 that is as good , almost, as that 357, just don't feel as solid., Mind you the 19 has had a lot of round through it. I shot a PPC gun built by a master and Lordy.
The Ruger is a strong gun, and a good trigger if worked on, just don't do it for me.
The Old Dan Wesson's had a great lock up, took getting use to, they locked the crain to the frame, Needed ? , I don't know.
I had trouble with L loaders with the colt, , Python ones O.K. , But that gun had the early target grips, and interfered a bit with the L ones.
There is no question the old Pythons triggers were great like my 57 & 61. The newer ones are too heavy for my liking. Mind you my S&W pre 27 that seen a few rounds also has a very nice trigger. They all lock up fine, but nothing i own equals the Python.
Not sure if op got the answer.
Python cylinder is locked when the trugger is at its pulled back position.
In a SW, with my 586, you can wiggle the cylinder no matter what. In a python you can't when trigger is at it fully pulled position to ensure perfect cylinder barrel alignment.
I sold my 94 Python for a good price and i am looking at buy a new one.
Also, at the moment you pull the hammer you can tell what a python is.
Python cylinder is locked when the trugger is at its pulled back position.
In a SW, with my 586, you can wiggle the cylinder no matter what. In a python you can't when trigger is at it fully pulled position to ensure perfect cylinder barrel alignment.
I sold my 94 Python for a good price and i am looking at buy a new one.
Also, at the moment you pull the hammer you can tell what a python is.
Oh boy, I gave up firearms a while ago.
Still, thank you for the explanation
Now I am lost, What is the point of all this info, when you don't have any, and said you wanted this info, Nothing better to do I guess.
Thou he did open up a old post, thinking he may be helping.
