Call me crazy, but I like the original Tavor's looks better.
Call me crazy, but I like the original Tavor's looks better.
I still don't get why IDF have to have that silly mag retention deviece.
Also there has got to be a better design for the Tavor than slapping on a 203 like that.
Call me crazy, but I like the original Tavor's looks better.
Those pictures were taken by me.More here:
http://www.balashnikov.com/showthread.php?t=6212
A new IWI grenade launcher is under development.
IDF wants to use it's existing M203s.
IDF troops have to carry their rifles everywhere, evident from all the pictures of hot Israeli women getting icecream with M16s. The mag retention device allows then to carry an empty rifle but have the mag right there always with the rifle.I still don't get why IDF have to have that silly mag retention device.
I agree but it's not a beauty contest. The X95 is better.
I think the X95 with the full size trigger guard looks better than the ones in the picture.
![]()
Dirty!I agree but it's not a beauty contest. The X95 is better.
I think the X95 with the full size trigger guard looks better than the ones in the picture.
![]()

Dirty!
Dirty Pic's & thanx 4 sharing cuz sharing is caring
But ya still haven't filled me in why you guyz have to strap your mags to the rifle? Is this just mandatory when on patrol or is it like that all the time?



























