Cougar shot and left near Cochrane has Fish and Wildlife looking for poacher

Yeah, to avoid being crucified.

Exactly this. Our COs tend to make you prove your innocence, rather than they prove your guilt. I know of a few individuals who've killed either bears or cats in self-defense and reported it. None of them will make that mistake again. SSS.
 
but the indigenous are "stewards of the land" and would never do this! :rolleyes:

Yeah I was watching a show on APTN the Indian (first nations channel ) about a city Dene Indian returning to learn the ways of his people.
The first I see them do is kill a cow moose in the summer. Moose populations are down and hunting is being further restricted.
Next I see the phucking Stewart's of the land shooting ducks on the river from a motor boat ...ripping up river and shooting them when they are flying beside the fricken boat.
Totally disgusting, a white man would get crucified for such behavior! !!
I will absolutely NEVER report anyone for what may seem like game violations ever....if its good for one IMHO it's fricken good for all!!!
 
$50,000 fine or 1 year jail sentence. Or both. Sounds like that's the maximum penalty for any Wildlife Act offence in Alberta? If so then it's at the Crown's discretion to administer a fine and/or sentencing penalty up to and including that. Penalties for Wildlife Regulation offences probably follow a different schedule. Also includes forfeiture of equipment used in the offence as well as suspensions from holding a recreational hunting license.

Cougar season is specified as Dec 1 to Feb 28. But contravenes Section 24(1) [no license] and Section 41(2) [hide abandonment] of the Alberta Wildlife Act.

http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/acts/w10.pdf

http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/Regs/1997_143.pdf

Penalties

92(1) A person who is convicted of
(a) an offence specified in subsection (3), or
(b) any offence involving a contravention of this Act where
(i) that person is a corporation, or
(ii) that person has previously been convicted of any
offence involving a contravention of this Act and the
offences for which the current conviction and a
previous conviction were imposed occurred not more
than 5 years apart,
is liable to a fine of not more than $100 000 or to imprisonment for
a term of not more than 2 years, or both.

(2) A person who is convicted of an offence against this Act under
circumstances where subsection (1) does not apply is liable to a
fine of not more than $50 000 or to imprisonment for a term of not
more than one year, or both
.

(3) The offences referred to in subsection (1)(a) are offences
(a) against section 35, 55(3) or 62(1) or (2),
(b) against section 25(1), if the wildlife is an endangered
animal,
(b.1) against section 59(1) if the offence relates to wildlife with
respect to which a permit referred to in that subsection
may not be lawfully issued, or
(c) involving a contravention of any other provision of this
Act that involves the hunting of a grizzly bear.

Only applies if you're a whitey.
 
If that was the case, can you think of a reason to not report it?

Sadly, reporting "yourself" to the COs rarely ends well. I'm not condoning poaching of any kind but I do know a couple individuals who had bad experiences in the past.

The first, a friend, shot a small cow moose in a calf/bull only season, it was his first year moose hunting and made the mistake of taking the shot. Once he realised what he had done, he immediately called the COs. They obviously seized the carcass and took his tag. What surprised us is that he received a 3000$ fine and a one year hunting prohibition for essentially doing the ethical thing after his mistake.

The second, my father-in-law shot a nice 8pt buck the first couple days of archery season in Qc (archery is always the first season in Qc for big game), as he approached the dead deer he could smell a foul odor. He tagged the deer, got it registered and brought it home to hang and skin the deer. The deer had a .22 cal slug in the brisket and a bad infection. He called the COs, they showed up at his house, seized the deer as evidence of poaching, did not reissue a new tag and he had to fight for weeks to get the antlers back and finally got them after talking to one of his acquaintances who happened to be a CO elsewhere.

Those are only the "stories" I've heard from close friends and family. I've heard much worse from other hunters. I guarantee you, most people after hearing such stories will think twice before contacting COs which is a shame. Even reporting poachers can turn into a hassle, no one likes to get questioned/challenged about their activities and proving they are not poaching while attempting to report poaching.
 
Yes. Unwanted hassle with the CO's. Very seldom does any "good deed" go unpunished.
I do not condone poaching for an instant, but at this point all that really is known is someone killed a cat and that the article is suggesting poaching. It well may be a bonafide case of poaching, we really don't know. I find it odd that there is more concern for the cat than the person missing some gloves.
I think we will see more and more of rural Alberta not bothering to call LE for anything, it is simply more hassle than it is worth and in many cases opens doors that should never be opened.

This!
 
Regarding sentencing if the perpetrator is brought to justice: the penalties for Wildlife Act offences in Alberta are obviously quite severe so representation by competent legal counsel is advantageous. Not a criminal offence; however, if sentenced then Section 718 of the Criminal Code, Purpose and Principles of Sentencing, might have some bearing on sentencing severity -

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-182.html#docCont

Purpose

718 The fundamental purpose of sentencing is to protect society and to contribute, along with crime prevention initiatives, to respect for the law and the maintenance of a just, peaceful and safe society by imposing just sanctions that have one or more of the following objectives:

(a) to denounce unlawful conduct and the harm done to victims or to the community that is caused by unlawful conduct;

(b) to deter the offender and other persons from committing offences;

(c) to separate offenders from society, where necessary;

(d) to assist in rehabilitating offenders;

(e) to provide reparations for harm done to victims or to the community; and

(f) to promote a sense of responsibility in offenders, and acknowledgment of the harm done to victims or to the community.



So mitigating (as well as aggravating) circumstances are considered in sentencing. Not sure how Section 781 might be relevant, if at all, if the culprits are apprehended and turn out to be alien animal mutilators (note the green gloves or are the hands green?). :eek:

39219775694_5cd266dcb6_z.jpg
 
Why would a 'poacher', shoot and leave as is?

There are idiots who feel that the only good predator is a dead one and will shoot on sight, without a care for what happens to it afterwords.

A decent investigator should be able to piece together the evidence, especially with snow around, and figure out approximately what went down.
 
some years back my brother in law shot one out of season as it stalked his calves in BC. He had nothing but trouble, made the paper, had idiots phone him at home, plus the wardens visiting a few times. like self defense in this country, you are in the right, but it won't feel like it by the time they are done with you.
 
Who shoots an out of season cougar and then starts a campfire? Hanging out by a fire and a curious kitty shows up or keeping warm while skinning and got the hell outa dodge?

Yeah I think the campfire is key. Your fingers are nice and warm while cleaning/skinning the animal. It’s afterwards you might decide to build a fire to warm up and get cleaned up.

Given the limited information, my guess would be:

Guy starts fire.
Guy sees cougar snooping about.
Guy’s adrenaline goes through the roof.
Guy feels threatened.
Guy shoots cougar.
Adrenaline finally comes down.
Guy starts to second guess the necessity of the situation.
Guy realizes it’s gonna be hard to plead self defence to the fish cops.
Guy hears voices coming.
Guy GTFO.


My $0.02
 
Back
Top Bottom