This is true. From my limited knowledge, a "right-of-way" has the be the least destructive method possible. I.E. Your "neighbour" can't have a four-lane road paved across 90% of your terrain. On the flip-side of the coin, you can't just be an a**hole, for the sakes of being such. You'll need to prove to a court why you are indeed blocking land access to the titled land. I'm not sure this applies to Crown land, however (and I doubt it).
And as mentioned elsewhere, right-of-way is common-law. Sorry folks, you can't block people from their land because it might impede the "pristine" condition.
(For whomever mentioned Canada has property rights, give your head a shake. You have ZERO true property rights in Canada.)