Weird, I didn't know that... but since this is semi-auto and not leaver/bolt then maybe it wouldn't apply?
“restricted firearm” means
(a) a handgun that is not a prohibited firearm,
(b) a firearm that
(i) is not a prohibited firearm,
(ii) has a barrel less than 470 mm in length, and
(iii) is capable of discharging centre-fire ammunition in a semi-automatic manner,
(c) a firearm that is designed or adapted to be fired when reduced to a length of less than 660 mm by folding, telescoping or otherwise.
Personally I don't care if its restricted or not since u would only ever shoot it at a range anyway
Would be sweet to have it in .22 to avoid magazine cap laws
Something like this
![]()
And my crazy imagination AR-Skorp in .17 would be awesome
![]()
![]()
So can they be ordered from anywhere yet?
Thay bottom pic looks awesome.
Put a little vert grip on it and G2G
I will take 2 pleaseHere you go
![]()
+1. I think the photoshop version would sell like hotcakes.Totally in for a conversion kit. And an extra upper like the photoshop version. That thing is sick!
It appears that, unless it's considered a handgun, you could just put the .22 kit in and it should NO LONGER BE RESTRICTED. In part b, it needs to meet ALL THREE conditions to be considered restricted. The key question is how one would interpret "capable of" in part b(iii). Is it still capable of shooting centre-fire ammunition, if a .22 kit has been inserted. Does capable of mean it can be converted back?
Section (c) MIGHT be a problem as it can fire when reduced by folding, but a simple tac weld to make the stock non-folding should solve that problem.
I'd say if you could get it re-verified and have the REGISTRAR cancel your restricted registration certificate, it would be an indication that you are indeed in possession of a NON-RESTRICTED firearm.