manbearpig
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Somewhere in the Third World
First of all lets get some facts straight. A McMillan does not cost twice as much as an HS Precision, and the ones I own cost nowhere near "$600-$700".
$500+whatever color options you add, $100 for adj comb, +shipping, +customs, +taxes on top of everything vs a ~$300 HS Precision take-off.
My McMillan also weighs less than your HS. I guarantee it.
my HS precisions are 2.4lbs, and ive modified them by filling the entire hollow part with solid fibreglass -- so subtract some weight from that for an unmodified stock. Mcmillans are between 3-4.5lbs, i dont have one to weigh but id say the A-2 i owned was definitely on the heavier end of that spectrum. 1-2 lbs is a pretty big deal especially considering that these rifles generally are not light to begin with
By your own admission a McMillan is significantly stronger. $150 worth of significance is money well spent IMO.
it is most definitely not a $150 difference. you cant just look at the $468 price tag of a Mcmillan and quote that here in Canada as their realistic price. if you actually read my posts you will see that i said HS Precision takeoffs are widely available in the EE whereas to get a Mcmillan you will have to order it from the factory, wait for up to half a year, and get @$#raped by customs if it finally arrives. in the real world a Mcmillan will cost you twice as much as an HS Precision.
as for the durability issue its no sinister 'admission' - i listed it several times as a feature of the Mcmillan stock. i also stated several times that this added durability would probably never come into play for the average hunter, making it pretty superfluous and hardly 'necessary'. it would be a significant difference in durability in the military, but their weapons see a lot more punishment and rough use than most hunters will ever subject their firearms to.
sure, but is Then there is the issue of average Joe Hunter and his big game hunting battery. Most, in all likelyhood, have more rifles in the safe than I do. A good reliable virtually indestructable laid up fiberglass/graphite stock is worth much more to me than an extra Remington SPS topped with a Bushnell Banner in the safe. It's cheaper as well.
i totally agree, but the question wasnt 'should i get a Mcmillan for my current rifle or buy another Remington SPS'. the question was 'is a Mcmillan necessary on a hunting rifle' and the answer is still a big fat resounding NO.
No, a McMillan will not make you a better hunter. It just might keep you in the field longer though and I've noticed that better hunters gravitate to better things.![]()
i prefer the HS Precision, you prefer the Mcmillans. im glad the market offers both of us a product that makes us happy. neither is required for hunting.
**BTW i just realised something:
i am referring to the tactical style Mcmillans like the A-2, A-3, A-4, etc, compared to the HS Precisions. i have never owned a Mcmillan 'hunting' stock, nor handled one. if they are much different or much lighter/cheaper then we are probably discussing completely different things here.























































