Custom stocks

[HuntingTwenty47]

I’ve broken Or grown sick of 3 stocks now on a few of my bolt and semi pattern guns and I’m toying around with finding an ideal way to take the crucial components from the main shooting mechanism of my 702 and make it have to be part of the stock so it can qualify under legal terms as a “bullpup” style. The Kriss and the tavors are legal under the sense that without the stock itself the gun is inoperable but with the 702 you pull it off a chassis and it’s still 100% functional. Idk pipe dreams I guess but I’m messing around with sketch papers and CAD to see if I can work out a strong reliable stock alternate for plinkstwr rifles that can have it convert into a bullpup under the exact word and length overall to fall within a legal standpoint in reguards to our party clown style gun laws. Also just styling random hand carved stocks will upload everything in due time once it looks more like a product and less like a project !!! Have a good day everyone

 

[Suther]

From the way I'm reading it the Tavor is legal because you're not adding a different stock to make it a bullpup, it is by design a bullpup.

2 Any rifle, shotgun or carbine stock of the type known as the “bull-pup” design, being a stock that, when combined with a firearm, reduces the overall length of the firearm such that a substantial part of the reloading action or the magazine-well is located behind the trigger of the firearm when it is held in the normal firing position.

Bullpup stocks are prohib, but you're not adding a stock that reduces the overall length of a Tavor etc.

Nowhere does it say the stock has to be integral to the operation of the firearm that I can see?

Sounds to me like you're looking for a loophole that isn't there...

 

[skwerl]

hey hy

 

[HuntingTwenty47]

I read that on one of these forums I’m trying to find anything with any relevance within the current rules and regulations reguarding the topic but so far have gone through like 80 pages of str8 BS and brand name ban lists

From the way I'm reading it the Tavor is legal because you're not adding a different stock to make it a bullpup, it is by design a bullpup.



Bullpup stocks are prohib, but you're not adding a stock that reduces the overall length of a Tavor etc.

Nowhere does it say the stock has to be integral to the operation of the firearm that I can see?

Sounds to me like you're looking for a loophole that isn't there...