CZ 858...Is it worth the extra $$$ over the SKS.

[misanthropist]

I am talking about serious shooting, not hitting a one foot gong at 200 yards, at 50 yards I want to be able to hit below MOA with a CZ 858, 100 yards should be 1 to 2 inch, 200 yards below 5 inch, all with surplus ammo, much better with reloading. Don't tell people that a red dot is perfect for 200 yards just because you have one.

If your idea of "serious shooting" is trying to make sub-moa groups with a tactical rifle in a short-range rainbow caliber like x39...

...well, it's no wonder you get labelled "troll".

 

[Stevo]

You are the one insulting people, calling me ### and bashing minorities, remember?

I am talking about serious shooting, not hitting a one foot gong at 200 yards, at 50 yards I want to be able to hit below MOA with a CZ 858, 100 yards should be 1 to 2 inch, 200 yards below 5 inch, all with surplus ammo, much better with reloading. Don't tell people that a red dot is perfect for 200 yards just because you have one. I mean, I can shoot better with my 22 and Tasco scope, LOL.

Different strokes for different folks.

This post clearly shows your attitude, you are not used that people are not backing down, are you? Common strategy for trollers like you is calling other people names. Joke.

You certainly have your own unique worldview.

Once again, you make an arguement against something I never said. Please show me where I said a red dot was "perfect" for 200 yds. Oh right, you can't. You also can't find anywhere that I've called you a name. You're the insult guy.

You have an interesting sliding accuracy scale as well. If you expect a half inch group at 50 yards (that's what MOA means at that distance), why do you only expect 2 1/2 MOA at 200 yds?

Have a nice evening.