Cz 858 Owners

OK. Then I haven't missed anything. In my humble opinion I would say go after the politicians and not the gun manufacturers. I like my 858 just the way it is. I wouldn't change a thing about it.

Thanks All for the Info.
 
Last edited:
wjcbsr said:
OK. Then I haven't missed anything. I my humble opinion I would go after the politicians and not the gun manufacturers. I like my 858 just the way it is. I wouldn't change a thing about it.

Thanks All for the Info.
Click to expand...

its not a change in design. its NEW vs USED that is the problem. and that is CZ's fault.
 
Oh. Then I am confused. I thought it was because the receivers (which may have been previously used as automatic configured receivers) were easily convertible from semi-automatic to automatic and the RCMP people didn't like that. Didn't Blaney also pass a law that the RCMP/CFO is not allowed to reclassify a firearm that has previously been classified by them?

Seems I'm good to go...
 
wjcbsr said:
Oh. Then I am confused. I thought it was because the receivers (which may have been previously used as automatic configured receivers) were easily convertible from semi-automatic to automatic and the RCMP people didn't like that.
Click to expand...

That is correct. After 2007 FA receivers were converted to semi auto and that is what the RCMP lab used as a reason for the reclassification of rifles after that date.
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking all of us CZ858 owners should go gopher hunting together and see how many of us they will arrest ;-)

I agree, FreedomIsn'tFree.

I wonder if they have a jail big enough? Maybe Mr. Wolverine knows how many it would need to hold.
 
223762 said:
the receivers had been given a serial number that had to be milled off giving the receiver a "big milled window" instead of the "narrow milled window" the 05-06 have.
Click to expand...

I guess I just assumed they were manufactured surplus units that were "re-purposed" not sure how serial numbers prove they were actually ever deployed and used?
 
Can-down said:
I guess I just assumed they were manufactured surplus units that were "re-purposed" not sure how serial numbers prove they were actually ever deployed and used?
Click to expand...

the serial number was the last step in the manufacturing process. only the 05-06 get away with being "re-purposed".
 
Sent.

Mr. Kallus,

Living in Canada, I purchased a CZ 858 in good faith from a very reputable dealer. I was very happy with my purchase at the time. I now find through no fault of my own that it is prohibited and cannot use it any longer. I am not happy at all to find myself in this situation. Furthermore, I am very disappointed due to the fact that I really do like CZ firearms but just cannot buy anymore under these circumstances.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom