CZ 958 "Teaser # 2" :)

Status
Not open for further replies.
for the top one, will we be able to throw a muzzle brake and front sight post on it. i think i want the fixed stock version but would rather run it with irons only!
this has probably been asked but after a quick skim i didn't see anything.
 
Is it too late to ask for captured pins and can I swap the dust cover from my 858 ?
 
I already have a nice little Burris 2-7 for it... Just need to decide which rifle to get. I like aspects of both.
 
Hummmmmm........

Understand what they are trying to do (and kudos for doing so).

But aesthetically, it looks like crap...... proportions, lines, weight.... something just grates on my nerves with the design.

For those hovering over the keyboards in flaming anticipation.... I own two 858's (a -4V and -2V).

L
 
Hummmmmm........

Understand what they are trying to do (and kudos for doing so).

But aesthetically, it looks like crap...... proportions, lines, weight.... something just grates on my nerves with the design.

For those hovering over the keyboards in flaming anticipation.... I own two 858's (a -4V and -2V).

L

the design? It's the same damn gun! Just a few different cuts in the reciever and a modified full length reciever cover. That it! (minus irons on the hunter) Arw you talking about the 18.5" barrel?


Anyhow.. let's talk calibers. 7.62x39 is a given. What's the possibility of .223/5.56, 5.45, or perhaps 6.8 SPC?
 
Details on the rear sight ? is it elevation adjustable ? Why not have it on the rear of the flattop for a longer sight radius?

Indeed. Why not? Its an arbitrary decision. Most complaints of Post Soviet designed weapons will always list the shorter sight radius and open notched sights as problematic.
The hunter (by name) is designed for accuracy rather than using the selector on full-auto to mow down imperialist scum in the back whilst riding on the top of glorious Russian tank.
Every week you hear about someone trying to retro-fit peep sights to the back of an SKS to gain the longer sight radius.

Why not fix two problems with one. Alternatively, create a modified version of #2 (2.5? - that moves the milling coordinates to the back of the receiver instead of the front.

L
 
the design? It's the same damn gun! Just a few different cuts in the reciever and a modified full length reciever cover. That it! (minus irons on the hunter) Arw you talking about the 18.5" barrel?


Anyhow.. let's talk calibers. 7.62x39 is a given. What's the possibility of .223/5.56, 5.45, or perhaps 6.8 SPC?

Nope - the back end of the receiver cover that looks like someone decided to use a chop saw.... :)
Guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.....

L
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom