CZ SP01 & Beretta Inox range report

lineofsight

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
179   0   0
A couple weeks ago took CZ to range for function test, 20 rounds, not so sure where they went, tonight it was time to shoot with intent.

Took the CZ and Bert to Semiahmoo (20m indoor) range - you may recall an earlier thread asking for input on 9mm pistols, through some incantations/pleas/promises that cannot be repeated, contortions, voodoo magic, and just living dangerously, ended up both the CZ & Beretta.

Put about 150 rounds through the two of them alternating between them shooting groups of 5 (cause lot easier to load 5 than 10). Interestingly (well maybe not), both produced the same pattern, low and to the left. The last 40 rounds pattern had "tightened" and shifted a little closer to the target center - obviously the target center was drawn in the wrong place.

Found the sights on the CZ clearer - front sight fills more of the rear sight, Bert has more space on either side of the sight and felt like was aiming right to obtain proper sight picture, again though, same results with both, just easier with CZ. The night sights on the CZ also just plain clearer than the white dots on black sight (formerly red dots on stainless).

Found less muzzle flip / recoil with CZ (is heavier), controls on CZ also heavier.

Groups better when consciously more pressure on front and back of grip and more on weak hand than strong hand. Not find much difference where putting finger on trigger even though suspect that this primary cause of shooting left.

Though Bert strips more easily, the CZ much simpler to clean - far fewer nooks and crannies. Really like how the barrel locks up to the slide on the CZ from a design point of view, simple and very solid. Also interesting to compare the simple CZ approach to barrel pivot versus Bert's locking block, pin, retaining pin...

Safeties function in opposite directions - CZ up on, Bert down on. CZ safety not engage unless hammer cocked. Bert's safety functions any time and also as decocker.

Magazines are not interchangeable, I knew that but ended up testing it just the same (mental note, draw line in silver on Bert's mags).

The CZ has an elegance in the simplicity and ruggedness of the design, the Beretta elegant in smoothness/operation of controls and appearance. Both classic designs (though the CZ copied its from the Browning HP while Bert is original with 500 +years of family business behind it). Would not be able to choose between them at this point (though bear in mind if buying one CZ $775, Inox $899 and no accessory rail). Both fire without magazine SA/DA.

Here are the last two targets (left side is actually bottom). If interested in similar targets for your own use can trade you for 9mm ammo as need a lot more practice. The targets may be slightly different than mine though and do need a bit of lead time to produce these.

Next time may start at shorter distance, use rest, no rest, further distance, yada yada yada, but hey, had to just try it first.

Was a great evening, good atmosphere at the range, dad who used to shoot took his son shooting, RO brought out some different pistols for him and provided some tips, other father son team, fellow with interesting bulls eye box, then good drive home (why do they sell cars with more than 300hp, just no good can come of that). Came home, wife had cleaning supplies already laid out. Coons on back deck waiting to hear about range trip (sure are timid eh?). Now a little more work.

20A.jpg



20B.jpg



Coon1.jpg



Coon2.jpg



Coon3.jpg
 
Good to hear you like your 92 Inox....:) but how come no pics of the guns?

btw I never heard anyone call Beretta a Bert... Some people like to give their guns gril names; which isn't nessesary with a name like Beretta... you gave your gun a man's name!? :eek: :p
 
Last edited:
I like Beretta, it is extremely 'fast; gun.
I love shooting this gun close range 10-15m, target acquisition is phenomenal, however for accuracy I like CZ SHADOW.
 
Friends tell me Big Bertha is reserved for the Remington 870 in a car mount, and when requires a little respect lets her presence known by coughing / cycling the action.

Think my CZ is a Tactical, not Shadow (fixed night sights, accessory rail), feels serious.

Typed Bert cause too lazy to type Beretta. Truth be told, too new for a name, but since you asked (yes I know you didnt)... my Buckmark = John, Wife's Buckmark = Jane, CZ 452 = Sara, Remy 700 = Anna, Mossberg Mariner = Tanya, Cooey 70 = Lauren, Sears/Cooey 64 Sierra, other Cooeys go by their model # and stock colour. Were any of you told the name of the firearm when you bought it of EE?
 
Last edited:
Good to here you're enjoying my CZ ;) I miss her! But I have an STI Spartan on the way.......If WW3 broke out and you could only choose one, either the CZ or Beretta, what would you grab?
 
The CZ, more durable and night sights. But would reach for the Mossberg Mariner first and would also want the Sears 8C .22 - see those fat racoons in the yard (oh, if my wife read that...).

Welcome to try the CZ or Berettas anytime (is an Elite II on the way) though I vaguely remember you saying something along the lines that 9mms were for girlie men and not backwoods beer drinking hockey playing Okanagan boys which is why you sold the 9mms (and kept the .22).

Spartan is nice, have a look here http://media.stiguns.com/USPress/Comp1911-2008/Model1911-08_Spartan.pdf

Will let you know next time I'm up, maybe bring a rifle, pistol, or something.
 
Welcome to the group of CZ and Beretta! By the way, the black dot that you print on the cardbroad cannot make you focus. Buy some 2" orange round target sticker or go Home Depot get some paint sample card with bright colour. YOu will find you shoot much better with this two gun, they are top notch.

Trigun
 
Good report. I just took issue with one of your statements however. The CZ is not a copy of the Browning High Power, in any direct way. It is influenced by it, as is every gun designed since 1935, but is not a copy. Check out Stephen Camp's Hi Power website. He does a direct comparison between the two pistols.
 
Trigun, Thanks for the tip on the brighter bulls eye.

Redstar, Thanks for the comparison link. Their are also sites that attribute a more direct lineage than cousins. There is a site that shows both in various states of disassembly, looked for an hour but cant find it again and need to do a little work (will look more later).

The DA/SA is a fairly obvious difference between the two designs but the CZ certainly shares more with the HP than any other design that precedes it. Would also expect that with 50 or so years between the two a thing or two was learned in the interim and applied - just like M&P isnt just a Glock Copy (a la Sigma).

Personally, I really like how the barrel lugs lock to the slide which is identical, absence of barrel bushing, and barrel cam / no locking block which both designs share.

Am amazed at the weight difference between the CZ and Beretta - 240 grams / half a pound. Also in terms of controls the CZ is much heavier, my wife can comfortably work the Beretta not so with the CZ. Perhaps can in terms of a male perspective - CZ soccer player / life guard, Beretta ballerina / cheer leader...

See you're both local, maybe meet you at the range. Cheers.
 
Also in terms of controls the CZ is much heavier, my wife can comfortably work the Beretta not so with the CZ
I bet it's because of CZ's low profile slide, it can be difficult to grab. Also with Berettas slide safety you have something to grab on to making it very easy to operate the slide (the action is like butter anyways).

Also the slide release is way too far and high to reach for someone who doesn't have very large hands (I can release the slide release w/o changing my grip in 92FS but need another inch to reach it on the CZ.)
 
Think for her its mostly the weight of the recoil spring, its very heavy on the CZ.

The CZ, like the Elite, also has the grip grooves on the front of the slide which facilitates checking the chamber (when pistol held close). The shape of the bottom of the slide on the Beretta (thin to thick) works the same way though (dont slip as holding onto thin part and pushing against thicker part).

The Beretta's action is indeed very slick, cycle the action before you realize the slide moved. The safety/decocker a little high.

Our Buckmark pistols have little "ears" on the back of the slide that make it real easy to work the slide when pistol is held extended. As their location would not interfere with holster draw I am a little surprised that other designs have not "noted" this design feature.

I shoot at Semiahmoo Fish & Game (184th & ~16th Ave) and PoCo. Not been to Thompson Mnt, Mission, or Abby, will check them out before renewing at PoCo.
 
Back
Top Bottom