people are way too hung up on the whole has to take Stanag mag thing IMO. We will never see a better designed rifle if the mag stays the same.Would you rather have an RFB and a Tavor, or just ONE of these rifles?
I am guessing for this to work properly, it would have to have a custom magazine. If it isn't an AR type magazine, then it would be useless to me as a 223 sporting rifle.
Except for saving space in the safe, and $$ on not having 2 rifles, what is the benefit of having one rifle replace 2?
Hopefully it will be direct impingment and in non restricted barrel lengths.
It looks like a Tavor and an RFB had a love child![]()
I'm thinking piston:
![]()
I'm thinking piston:
![]()
looks like a cheap keltec looking pos, probably just a rfb knock off. the price point still won't even touch the t97, nothing is cheaper than something put together with slave labour
looks like a cheap keltec looking pos, probably just a rfb knock off. the price point still won't even touch the t97, nothing is cheaper than something put together with slave labour
I'm thinking piston:
![]()
No it wouldn't. Why don't you go away and play with your slave labour built and non existent qced piece of sh*t. People who appreciate a quality firearms are talking over here. Nobody forced you to like it, or buy it.
people are way too hung up on the whole has to take Stanag mag thing IMO. We will never see a better designed rifle if the mag stays the same.



























