Rayleigh_Scattering
Regular
- Location
- Under the arch
I seek wisdom.
I have recently acquired, by trade, a 1918 Mk III*.
It looks good, but you can really see the stresses of the Great War on the production line. That's the nature of milsurps, no worries, and I'm sure it did what G.R. wanted it to do.
A scope mount was installed at some point (very recently) by drilling and tapping. I unscrewed it to inspect the workmanship.
The location and alignment of the holes drilled for that mount is good. The threading is perfect, and the holes line up exactly with the holes in the mount rail.
I have a question about the depth of the holes. The tail of my caliper wouldn't fit, so I used a handy hex key to illustrate:
The measured depth of the holes is 9.2mm from the tangent, although there's probably +-0.2mm on that due to the squishy keratin tools I used as reference markers.
I don't know the internal construction of the receiver in this area, but the hole looks to be well through the receiver ring (which is relatively unstressed in this area) and a fair way into the barrel tenon at the chamber where all the psi happen.
Can anyone else with a similarly drilled MkIII take a quick measurement of the drilled hole depth for comparison?
I have recently acquired, by trade, a 1918 Mk III*.
It looks good, but you can really see the stresses of the Great War on the production line. That's the nature of milsurps, no worries, and I'm sure it did what G.R. wanted it to do.
A scope mount was installed at some point (very recently) by drilling and tapping. I unscrewed it to inspect the workmanship.
The location and alignment of the holes drilled for that mount is good. The threading is perfect, and the holes line up exactly with the holes in the mount rail.
I have a question about the depth of the holes. The tail of my caliper wouldn't fit, so I used a handy hex key to illustrate:



The measured depth of the holes is 9.2mm from the tangent, although there's probably +-0.2mm on that due to the squishy keratin tools I used as reference markers.
I don't know the internal construction of the receiver in this area, but the hole looks to be well through the receiver ring (which is relatively unstressed in this area) and a fair way into the barrel tenon at the chamber where all the psi happen.
Can anyone else with a similarly drilled MkIII take a quick measurement of the drilled hole depth for comparison?
Last edited: