Desert tech trek- 22 - 10/22 bull-pup

106mm (4.1")bans 4 inch barrels. 50% of handguns were probably old surplus police/army revolvers with suprise a standard 4 inch barrel. Also shorter barrels would be cheaper guns than long barreled pistols, which is why .25/.32 got the boot as being a cheap gun for someone to get into handguns.
 
So if someone like Dlask or Spectre who already manufactures a 10/22 receiver were to make an extra-long version of that part, so that the bullpup nature of the thing was indivisible from the serialized bit?
 
old303 said:
So if someone like Dlask or Spectre who already manufactures a 10/22 receiver were to make an extra-long version of that part, so that the bullpup nature of the thing was indivisible from the serialized bit?
Click to expand...

That would be alot of material required, and be very $$$

Doubt a super long reciever would cover it. Most bull pups, the stock keeps the recoil rod and bolt in. So when you remove the buttstock, the gun cannot fire. So you would need to make a 10/22 reciever with open back. Then a buttstock assembly, that the recoil rod locks into, and when removed the gun won't fire.
 
He'd need to build a receiver where the trigger mechanism is that much forward (and have it approved by the horse-people)
- and then, after having spent $$ designing said action and having spent $$$ to get approved... those same-horse-people will change the rule, call it a "variant" of something already prohibited... and declare it illegal...

If you don't agree with them, you are free to spend some more of your $$ to challenge the decision... all the while the horse-people will use your tax dollars to fill endless appeal...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom