Designed to hold only 5 Rounds

nelsonm64

nelsonm64

CGN Regular
Location
Kelowna, B.C.
i’m wondering if cross industries has considered making 5 round mags in 20 and 30 round length? if the liberals ban any magazine that can be modified to hold more than 5 rounds is banned, i see a huge opertunity for cross industries!

i highly dought any us manufacturers would be willing to make them, to small of a market i would think.

thoughts?
 
they’ve stated any magazine “originally” designed for more than 5 rounds will be prohibited... so i see an opportunity for someone to make 5 round mags. hopefully turdo will back off but, i dought it! he’s on a mission as misguided as it is!
 
nelsonm64 said:
they’ve stated any magazine “originally” designed for more than 5 rounds will be prohibited... so i see an opportunity for someone to make 5 round mags. hopefully turdo will back off but, i dought it! he’s on a mission as misguided as it is!
Click to expand...

Source on that? Wasn't aware.
 
nelsonm64 said:
i’m wondering if cross industries has considered making 5 round mags in 20 and 30 round length? if the liberals ban any magazine that can be modified to hold more than 5 rounds is banned, i see a huge opertunity for cross industries!

i highly dought any us manufacturers would be willing to make them, to small of a market i would think.

thoughts?
Click to expand...

The words will include 'capable of...' meaning if there is a larger magazine on the market that fits that rifle anywhere in the world, you are SOL.

You would need a custom receiver with a custom 5 round magazine.
 
what about internal or fixed mags like an SKS? or is this only apply to detached mags..
more no think bullshyt from a$$holes in the Liberals cave of deceit
 
Galt said:
what about internal or fixed mags like an SKS? or is this only apply to detached mags..
more no think bullshyt from a$$holes in the Liberals cave of deceit
Click to expand...

The antis have been pushing for 5 round maximum capacity by design.

They have said 'why should any firearm have a capacity greater than 5.

Then they also say that modifying a magazine for reduced capacity is a 'loophole'.

They want all the Lee Enfields...it never going to stop.
 
So is he going to "buy back" all of the magazines that have been sold in the last 25 years that have rivets in them?
 
KePet said:
So is he going to "buy back" all of the magazines that have been sold in the last 25 years that have rivets in them?
Click to expand...

They did this in NZ or Australia and people 3D printed them for additional income. Happens frequently in the USA when they offer "buybacks" too.
 
nelsonm64 said:
they’ve stated any magazine “originally” designed for more than 5 rounds will be prohibited... so i see an opportunity for someone to make 5 round mags. hopefully turdo will back off but, i dought it! he’s on a mission as misguided as it is!
Click to expand...

Where is this "They've stated" coming from? Who has stated what and where?

I don't see the point in making 5rd only magazines something easily obtained right now or "they" can easily just say "oh, go replace it with those". If we get stuck and have to replace our mags with 5rd ones that are not pinned then start making them.

What you are saying is like saying "we know they will ban the AR platform so lets all get rid of them and replace them with bolt actions", you are just making their lives easier to ban things.
 
It will never be enough, anyway so, might just as well fight em.. if keep up capitulation , The antis will simply creat another “ restriction “ They want ALL Guns Gone... get it now?
 
Pretty sure Cali already has this rule? Or somewhere must. Because I have one 5/30 round mag that is designed as 5 max right from factory. Came with an ar. And says can not be modded to hold more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom