Spoke with my buddy who had asked. He has a weird one that I suspect is all bubba'd but have not seen pics.
He said the top wood had a metal piece that followed the top wood and went to the length of the bottom stock?
Did the Long Branch prototypes have the same accuracy, felt recoil, and wandering zero problems the British-made Jungle Carbines did?
Did the Long Branch prototypes have the same accuracy, felt recoil, and wandering zero problems the British-made Jungle Carbines did?
Legit?
Incorrect rearsight, looks like the stock has been sanded. The forestock and buttstock don't seem to match.
Why is the bolt knob bent? The hole in the knob is too big.
Maybe they put them together with parts on hand?
My concern with this gun is also the receiver finish for the same reasons.Thank you for those photos Cantom. Everything looks both slightly different from the UK production and totally legit, except the receiver. That is not a Long Branch finish and if the rifles were ordered destroyed as an earlier poster said, then I can see how they might destroy the receivers, but save the rest. An employee may have later built those up on a No4 action and someone later decided to make the action "right", except that they couldn't reblue it correctly. The relief cuts also look a bit messy for Long Branch. Just my $.02
Regarding the bent bolt and large hole, those are known to Long Branch characteristics.
Is the stock band a No.4 pattern or a copy of the British Jungle Carbine band?