Differences in Sig pistols

KDX

KDX

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
97   0   1
If I was going to buy a Sig in 9mm, what are the differences between the 226, 228 and 229 models? I would say I have average sized hands. I had a Glock 17 and it fit well. Thanks in advance.
 
KDX said:
If I was going to buy a Sig in 9mm, what are the differences between the 226, 228 and 229 models? I would say I have average sized hands. I had a Glock 17 and it fit well. Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
P228 is essentially a shorter version of the old, German-made, stamped slide P226. P229 is the shorter version of the new, stainless slide P226. P228 and P229 have the same grip. It is not any slimmer than the P226 grip, although there is a slight difference in how they feel. Restricted P228 and P229 have extended barrels that protrude past the slide.

I also have average-sized hands and find that the P226 fits me well with stock plastic grips. Wood and rubber grips make it too thick. I was told that Hogue aluminum and G10 grips are slightly slimmer than factory plastics but have no personal experience with them.

Overall, I would highly recommend the P226. IMO, it's one of the best 9mm pistols out there.
 
Last edited:
Get a 226 its far superior to the Glock, I have both Glock and Sig.
 
I was the opposite, as much as i like the look of the glock it just felt funny in my hand, the sig 226 felt natural and looked great.But that was how it was for my hand and not yours.
 
How much is a sig 226 going to run, roughly, in Canada?

Also, if one is deciding between a glock or a sig, what is the biggest thing to look for? Essentially what feels better in the hand, right? I mean, in the end they're both going to be a great gun I'd assume?
 
Last edited:
USP said:
Get a 226 its far superior to the Glock, I have both Glock and Sig.
Click to expand...

I also have both and can say the above opinion is just that, an opinion but you cannot and will not go wrong with either. Personally I prefer the P226 to the G17 for shooting, it just fits my hand better. Now, that being said, I have a G17 that my dad now shoots, that was bought new in 1989, it is aGen1 and it has well over 250,000 rounds of everything through it and the only problems it has ever had were shooter problems, I have not so much as changed a spring in the gun. If My SIG's last half that long without issue, I will be very happy. Buy the one that best fits your hand. As far as the difference in the guns, the P228/P229 are smaller guns then the P226. the grips is basically the same diameter being a double stack, just the not as long in the grips and the barrel and slide are longer.
 
The 229 grip is a bit thicker than the 226, as is the slide. You also pay more for the 229 as they have to add a aftermarket barrel. Consider getting the .40cal 226, then you can add a 9mm and 357Sig barrel later.
 
Colin said:
The 229 grip is a bit thicker than the 226, as is the slide. You also pay more for the 229 as they have to add a aftermarket barrel. Consider getting the .40cal 226, then you can add a 9mm and 357Sig barrel later.
Click to expand...

You're right about paying more but the Canadian barrel is still Sig, not aftermarket.
 
sig all the way

I have carried a sig 225 on the job and liked it so much that I have bought more sigs over the years. I've got fairly small hands so I always went with a hogue wrap around grips. My current favorite is my 229 with both a .40 and sig .357 barrels.
I always enjoyed the 225 in 9mm. Just fit my hand so well.
 
ShaneN. said:
Essentially what feels better in the hand, right? I mean, in the end they're both going to be a great gun I'd assume?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't make that assumption. There are many differences between those two pistols that go beyond how they feel. Just look at the two side by side and compare the build quality - you will see right away why Sig costs nearly twice as much.

Then there are things like unsupported chamber in the Glock, no option of a traditional SA/DA trigger, etc.
 
~`

capp325 said:
I wouldn't make that assumption. There are many differences between those two pistols that go beyond how they feel. Just look at the two side by side and compare the build quality - you will see right away why Sig costs nearly twice as much.

Then there are things like unsupported chamber in the Glock, no option of a traditional SA/DA trigger, etc.
Click to expand...

I wasn't doubting that the sig is better quality, I was just looking for someone to say if the glock feels nice in your hands it is also a good gun, as that's what is in my price range for my first one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom